SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Brown G, Manogue M, Rohlin M. Assessing attitudes in dental education: is it worthwhile? Br Dent J 2002: 193: 703707.
  • 2
    General Dental Council. Standards for dental professionals. London: The General Dental Council, 2005.
  • 3
    Cowpe J, Plasschaert A, Harzer W, Vinkka-Puhakka H, Walmsley AD. Profile and Competences for the European Dentist – update 2009. Association for Dental Education in Europe; 2009. Available at: http://www.adee.org/cms/uploads/adee/TF_I_V2_September2009.pdf. [Accessed 28th February 2010].
  • 4
    Irvine D. The performance of doctors. I: professionalism and self-regulation in a changing world. BMJ 1997: 314: 15401542.
  • 5
    Royal College of Physicians of London. Doctors in society: medical professionalism in a changing world. Report of a Working Party of the Royal College of Physicians of London. London: Royal College of Physicians of London, 2005.
  • 6
    van Mook WNKA, de Grave WS, Wass V, et al. Professionalism: evolution of the concept. Eur J Intern Med 2009: 20: e81e84.
  • 7
    General Dental Council. The first five years, 3rd edn(interim). London: The General Dental Council, 2008.
  • 8
    Committee of Postgraduate Dental Deans and Directors. A Curriculum for UK Dental Foundation Programme Training. Committee of Postgraduate Dental Deans and Directors, 2006. Available at: http://www.copdend.org.uk/download/Dental%20Foundation%20Programme%20Curriculum.pdf. [Accessed 21st March 2009].
  • 9
    Evetts J. The sociological analysis of professionalism: occupational change in the modern world. Int Sociol 2003: 18: 395415.
  • 10
    Calman K. The profession of medicine. BMJ 1994: 309: 1140.
  • 11
    American Board of Internal Medicine. ABIM project professionalism. Philadelphia: American Board of Internal Medicine, 1995.
  • 12
    Stern DT, Papadakis M. The developing physician – becoming a professional. N Engl J Med 2006: 355: 17941799.
  • 13
    Oxford English Dictionaries. The new shorter Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
  • 14
    Abbott A. The system of professions. London: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
  • 15
    Cruess SR, Cruess RL. Professionalism must be taught. Br Med J 1997: 315: 16741677.
  • 16
    Freidson E. Professionalism the third logic. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001.
  • 17
    Greenwood E. Attributes of a profession. Soc Work 1957: II: 4550.
  • 18
    Kultgen J. Ethics and professionalism. Philadelphia: University of Pensylvania Press, 1998.
  • 19
    Macdonald KM. The sociology of the professions. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1995.
  • 20
    Millerson G. The qualifying associations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 1964.
  • 21
    Parsons T. The social system. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 1951.
  • 22
    Arnold L. Assessing professional behaviour: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Acad Med 2002: 77: 502515.
  • 23
    Jha V, Bekker HL, Duffy SRG, Roberts TE. Perceptions of professionalism in medicine: a qualitative study. Med Educ 2006: 40: 10271036.
  • 24
    van de Camp K, Vernooij-Dassen M, Grol R, Bottema B. How to conceptualise professionalism: a qualitative study. Med Teach 2004: 6: 696702.
  • 25
    Inui TS. Flag in the wind: educating for professionalism in medicine. Washington DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, 2003.
  • 26
    Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. The CanMEDS physician competency framework. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, 2006.
  • 27
    Welie JVM. Is dentistry a profession? Part 1. Professionalism defined. J Can Dent Assoc 2004: 70: 529532.
  • 28
    Welie JVM. Is dentistry a profession? Part 2. The hallmarks of professionalism. J Can Dent Assoc 2004: 70: 599602.
  • 29
    Welie JVM. Is dentistry a profession? Part 3. Future challenges. J Can Dent Assoc 2004: 70: 675678.
  • 30
    Masella RS. Renewing professionalism in dental education: overcoming the market environment. J Dent Educ 2007: 70: 205216.
  • 31
    Dharamsi S, Pratt DD, MacEntee MI. How dentists account for social responsibility: economic imperatives and professional obligations. J Dent Educ 2007: 71: 15831592.
  • 32
    Nash DA. On ethics in the profession of dentistry and dental education. Eur J Dent Educ 2007: 11: 6474.
  • 33
    Downie RS. Professions and professionalism. J Philos Educ 1990: 24: 147159.
  • 34
    Ozar DT, Sokol DJ. Dental ethics at chairside, professional principles and practical applications. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002.
  • 35
    Shaw D. Ethics, professionalism and fitness to practise: three concepts, not one. Br Dent J 2009: 207: 5962.
  • 36
    Federation Dentaire International. International principles of ethics for the dental profession. Seoul: Federation Dentaire International, 1997.
  • 37
    Council of European Dentists. Code of ethics for dentists in the European Union. Brussels: Council of European Dentists, 2007.
  • 38
    American Dental Association. Principles of Ethics and Code of Professional Conduct Revised January 2011. American Dental Association, 2011. Available at: http://www.ada.org/sections/about/pdfs/ada_code.pdf. [Accessed 14th January 2011].
  • 39
    Canadian Dental Association. Code of Ethics August 1991, Addendum April 1997. Available at: http://www.cda-adc.ca/en/cda/about_cda/code_of_ethics/index.asp. [Accessed 14th January 2011].
  • 40
    Nath C, Schmidt R, Gunel E. Perceptions of professionalism vary most with educational rank and age. J Dent Educ 2006: 70: 825834.
  • 41
    Trathen A, Gallagher JE. Dental professionalism: definitions and debate. Br Dent J 2009: 206: 249253.
  • 42
    Verkerk MA, De Bree MJ, Mourits MJE. Reflective professionalism: interpreting CanMEDS’“professionalism”. J Med Ethics 2007: 33: 663666.
  • 43
    Evans L. Professionalism, professionality and the development of educational professionals. Brit J Educ Stud 2008: 56: 2038.
  • 44
    Downing SM. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 2003: 37: 830837.
  • 45
    Messick S. The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educ Res 1994: 23: 1323.
  • 46
    Aukes L. Personal reflection in medical education, PhD. University of Groningen, 2008.
  • 47
    Boenink AD. Teaching and learning reflection on medical professionalism, PhD. Free University of Amsterdam, 2006.
  • 48
    Bommer M, Gratto C, Gravander J, Tuttle M. A behavioral model of ethical and unethical decision making. J Bus Ethics 1987: 6: 265280.
  • 49
    Bury M. Health and illness in a changing society. London: Routledge, 1997.
  • 50
    Ferrell OC, Gresham LG, Fraedrich JA. Synthesis of ethical decision models for marketing. Journal of Macromarketing 1989: 9: 5564.
  • 51
    Harrington S. A test of a person – issue contingent model of ethical decision making in organizations. J Bus Ethics 1997: 16: 363375.
  • 52
    Hunt SD, Vitell S. A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing 1986: 6: 516.
  • 53
    Jones TM. Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model. Acad Manage Rev 1991: 16: 366395.
  • 54
    Schon D. The reflective practitioner how professional think in action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
  • 55
    Trevino LK. Ethical decision making in organizations: a person-situation interactionist model. Acad Manage Rev 1986: 11: 601617.
  • 56
    Hilton SR, Slotnick HB. Proto-professionalism: how professionalisation occurs across the continuum of medical education. Med Educ 2005: 39: 5865.
  • 57
    Mazor KM, Canavan C, Farrell M, Margolis MJ, Clauser BE. Collecting validity evidence for an assessment of professionalism: findings from think-aloud interviews. Acad Med 2008: 83(10 Suppl.): S9S12.
  • 58
    Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Lingard L. Basing the evaluation of professionalism on observable behaviors: a cautionary tale. Acad Med 2004: 79: S1S4.
  • 59
    Brown G, Bull J, Pendlebury M. Assessing student learning in higher education. London and New York: Routledge, 1997.
  • 60
    Gronlund NE. Measurement and evaluation in teaching, 3rd edn. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co Inc, 1976.
  • 61
    Mislevy RJ. Test theory reconceived. J Educ Measure 1996: 33: 379416.
  • 62
    Lowry S. Medical education: assessment of students. Br Med J 1993: 306: 5154.
  • 63
    Crossley J, Humphris G, Jolly B. Assessing health professionals. Med Educ 2002: 36: 800804.
  • 64
    Downing SM. Assessment of knowledge with written test forms. In: Norman G, Van der Vleuten C, Newble D, eds. International handbook of research in medical education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002: 647672.
  • 65
    van der Vleuten CPM. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 1996: 1: 4167.
  • 66
    Norman G, Van der Vleuten C, Newble D, eds. International handbook of research in medical education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
  • 67
    Stern DT, ed. Measuring medical professionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • 68
    Lynch DC, Surdyk PM, Eiser AR. Assessing professionalism: a review of the literature. Med Teach 2004: 26: 366373.
  • 69
    Veloski JJ, Fields SK, James RN, Boex R, Blank LL. Measuring professionalism: a review of studies with instruments reported in the literature between 1982 and 2002. Acad Med 2005: 80: 366370.
  • 70
    Jha V, Bekker HL, Duffy SRG, Roberts TE. A systematic review of studies assessing and facilitating attitudes towards professionalism in medicine. Med Educ 2007: 41: 822829.
  • 71
    Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA 2002: 287: 226235.
  • 72
    Stern DT, Frohna AZ, Gruppen LP. The prediction of professional behaviour. Med Educ 2005: 39: 7582.
  • 73
    Thistlethwaite J, Spencer J. Professionalism in medicine. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd, 2008.
  • 74
    Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 1990: 65(9 Suppl.): S63S67.
  • 75
    Price J, Price D, Williams G, Hoffenberg R. Changes in medical student attitudes as they progress through a medical course. J Med Ethics 1998: 24: 110117.
  • 76
    Robins S, Braddock CH, Fryer-Edwards KA. Using the American Board of Internal Medicine’s “Elements of Professionalism” for undergraduate ethics education. Acad Med 2002: 77: 523531.
  • 77
    Campbell JL, Richards SH, Dickens A, Greco M, Narayanan A, Brearley S. Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires. Qual Saf Health Care 2008: 17: 187193.
  • 78
    Boenink AD, Jonge P, Small K, Oderwald A, Tilburg W. The effects of teaching medical professionalism by means of vignettes: an exploratory study. Med Teach 2005: 27: 429432.
  • 79
    Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Stern D, Lingard L. The anatomy of the professional lapse: bridging the gap between traditional frameworks and students’ perceptions. Acad Med 2002: 77: 16522.
  • 80
    Sisson K, Newton J. The attitudes of dental students towards socially acceptable and unacceptable group working practices. Eur J Dent Educ 2007: 11: 160167.
  • 81
    Boon K, Turner J. Ethical and professional conduct of medical students: review of current assessment measures and controversies. J Med Ethics 2004: 30: 221226.
  • 82
    Rest JR. Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota press, 1979.
  • 83
    Kohlberg L. Essays on moral development. Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1984.
  • 84
    Bebeau MJ, Rest JR, Yamoor CM. Measuring dental students’ ethical sensitivity. J Dent Educ 1985: 49: 225235.
  • 85
    Chamberlain TC, Catano VM, Cunningham DP. Personality as a predictor of professional behavior in dental school: comparisons with dental practitioners. J Dent Educ 2005: 69: 12221237.
  • 86
    UKCAT Consortium. The UK Clinical Aptitude Test. 2011. Available at: http://www.ukcat.ac.uk/pages/details.aspx?page=non-CognitiveAnalysis [Accessed 14th January 2011].
  • 87
    Boursicot KAM, Roberts TE, Burdick WP. Structured assessments of clinical competence understanding medical education. Edinburgh: Association for the Study of Medical Education, 2007.
  • 88
    Van Zanten M, Boulet JR, Norcini JJ, McKinley DM. Using a standardised patient assessment to measure professional attributes. Med Educ 2005: 39: 2029.
  • 89
    Mazor KM, Zanetti ML, Alper EJ, et al. Assessing professionalism in the context of an objective structured clinical examination: an in-depth study of the rating process. Med Educ 2007: 41: 331340.
  • 90
    Arnold L, Shue CK, Kalishman S, et al. Can there be a single system for peer assessment of professionalism among medical students? A Multi-Institutional Study. Acad Med 2007: 82: 578586.
  • 91
    Rees C, Shepherd M. The acceptability of 360-degree judgements as a method of assessing undergraduate medical students’ personal and professional behaviours. Med Educ 2005: 39: 4957.
  • 92
    Stark R, Korenstein D, Karani R. Impact of a 360-degree professionalism assessment on faculty comfort and skills in feedback delivery. J Gen Intern Med 2008: 23: 969972.
  • 93
    Norcini JJ. Faculty observation of student professional behaviour. In: Stern DT, ed. Measuring medical professionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006: 147158.
  • 94
    Cruess R, McIlroy JH, Cruess S, Ginsburg S, Steinert Y. The professionalism mini-evaluation exercise: a preliminary investigation. Acad Med 2006: 81(10 Suppl.): S74S78.
  • 95
    Van Mook WNKA, De Grave WS, Huijssen-Huisman E, et al. Factors inhibiting assessment of students’ professional behaviour in the tutorial group during problem-based learning. Med Educ 2007: 4: 849856.
  • 96
    Zijlstra-Shaw S, Kropmans TJB, Tams J. Assessment of professional behaviour – a comparison of self-assessment by first year dental students and assessment by staff. Br Dent J 2005: 198: 165171.
  • 97
    van Mook WNKA, van Luijk SJ, O’Sullivan H, Wass V, Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CPM. General considerations regarding assessment of professional behaviour. Eur J Intern Med 2009: 20: e90e95.
  • 98
    Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Mylopoulos M. From behaviours to attributions: further concerns regarding the evaluation of professionalism. Med Educ 2009: 43: 414425.
  • 99
    Van Luijk SJ, Smeets JGE, Smits J, Wolfhagen I, Perquin MLF. Assessing professional behaviour and the role of academic advice at the Maastricht Medical School. Med Teach 2000: 22: 168172.
  • 100
    Van Luijk SJ. Eindrapport van het Projectteam Consilium Abeundi ingesteld door het DMW. Utrecht: Vereniging van Samendewerkingende Nederlands Universiteiten, 2002.
  • 101
    Fryer-Edwards K, Pinsky LE, Robins L. The use of Portfoilos to assess professionalism. In: Stern DT, ed. Measuring medical professionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006: 213234.
  • 102
    Driessen E, van Tartwijk J, van der Vleuten C, Wass V. Portfolios in medical education: why do they meet with mixed success? A systematic review. Med Educ 2007: 41: 12241233.
  • 103
    Mathers NJ, Challis MC, Howe AC, Field NJ. Portfolios in continuing medical education – effective and efficient? Med Edu 1999: 33: 521530.
  • 104
    Gordon J. Assessing students’ personal and professional development using portfolios and interviews. Med Educ 2003: 37: 335340.
  • 105
    Dornan T, Carroll C, Parboosingh J. An electronic learning portfolio for reflective continuing professional development. Med Educ 2002: 36: 767769.
  • 106
    Driessen E, van der Vleuten C, Schuwirth L, van Tartwijk J, Vermunt J. The use of qualitative research criteria for portfolio assessment as an alternative to reliability evaluation: a case study. Med Educ 2005: 39: 214220.
  • 107
    McMullan M, Endacott R, Gray MA, et al. Portfolios and assessment of competence: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs 2003: 41: 283294.
  • 108
    McCready T. Portfolios and the assessment of competence in nursing: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 2007: 44: 143151.
  • 109
    van Mook WNKA, Gorter SL, O’Sullivan H, Wass V, Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CPM. Approaches to professional behaviour assessment: tools in the professionalism toolkit. Eur J Intern Med 2009: 20: e153e157.
  • 110
    Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Hatala R, et al. Context, conflict, and resolution: a new conceptual framework for evaluating professionalism. Acad Med 2000: 75(10 Suppl.): S74S78.
  • 111
    General Dental Council. Student fitness to practise. London: The General Dental Council, 2010.
  • 112
    Christie C, Bowen D, Paarmann C. Effectiveness of faculty training to enhance clinical evaluation of student competence in ethical reasoning and professionalism. J Dent Educ 2007: 71: 10481057.