SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Ackerman PL. Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: cognitive abilities and information processing. J Exp Psychol Gen 1988: 117: 288318.
  • 2
    Ackerman PL, Cianciolo AT. Cognitive, perceptual-speed, and psychomotor determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition. J Exp Psychol Appl 2000: 6: 259290.
  • 3
    Kanfer R, Ackerman PL. Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. J Appl Psychol 1989: 74: 657690.
  • 4
    Yeo G, Neal A. A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: effects of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. J Appl Psychol 2004: 89: 231247.
  • 5
    Brydges R, Carnahan H, Backstein D, Dubrowski A. Application of motor learning principles to complex surgical tasks: searching for the optimal practice schedule. J Mot Behav 2007: 39: 4048.
  • 6
    Dubrowski A, Backstein D, Abughaduma R, Leidl D, Carnahan H. The influence of practice schedules in the learning of a complex bone-plating surgical task. Am J Surg 2005: 190: 359363.
  • 7
    Schmidt RA, Lee T. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis, 4th edn. Illinois: Human Kinetics, 2005.
  • 8
    Fitts PM, Posner MI. Human performance. CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, 1967.
  • 9
    Keehner M, Lippa Y, Montello D, Tendick F, Hegarty M. Learning a spatial skill for surgery: how the contributions of abilities change with practice. Appl Cogn Psychol 2006: 20: 487503.
  • 10
    Gansky SA, Pritchard H, Kahl E, et al. Reliability and validity of a manual dexterity test to predict preclinical grades. J Dent Educ 2004: 68: 985994.
  • 11
    Oudshoorn W. The utility of Canadian DAT perceptual ability and carving dexterity scores as predictors of psychomotor performance in first-year operative dentistry. J Dent Educ 2003: 67: 12011208.
  • 12
    Heintze U, Radeborg K, Bengtsson H, Stenlaas A. Assessment and evaluation of individual prerequisites for dental education. Eur J Dent Educ 2004: 8: 152160.
  • 13
    Gray SA, Deem LP. Predicting student performance in preclinical technique courses using the theory of ability determinants of skilled performance. J Dent Educ 2002: 66: 721727.
  • 14
    Gray SA, Deem LP, Straja SR. Are traditional cognitive tests useful in predicting clinical success? J Dent Educ 2002: 66: 12411245.
  • 15
    Lundergan WP, Soderstrom EJ, Chambers DW. Tweezer dexterity aptitude of dental students. J Dent Educ 2007: 71: 10901097.
  • 16
    de Andres AG, Sanchez E, Hidalgo JJ, Diaz MJ. Appraisal of psychomotor skills of dental students at University Complutense of Madrid. Eur J Dent Educ 2004: 8: 2430.
  • 17
    Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med 2006: 119: 166.e7166.e16.
  • 18
    Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G. Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ 2007: 41: 737745.
  • 19
    Park SE, Da Silva JD, Barnes JL, Susarla SM, Howell TH. Predicting dental school performance based on prior dental experience and exposure. Eur J Dent Educ 2010: 14: 16.
  • 20
    Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). [Internet], 2001. Available at: http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/measures/intrins. (Last accessed 7 March 2011).
  • 21
    Schmitt N. Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychol Assess 1996: 8: 350352.
  • 22
    McAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen V. Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport 1989: 60: 4858.
  • 23
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977: 33: 159174.
  • 24
    Kleinbaum DG, Klien M. Logistic regression: a self-learning text, 2nd edn. New York: Springer, 2002.
  • 25
    Boyle A, Santelli J. Assessing psychomotor skills: the role of the Crawford small parts dexterity test as a screening instrument. J Dent Educ 1986: 50: 176179.
  • 26
    Walcott A, Knight G, Charlick R. Waxing tests as predictors of students’ performance in preclinical dentistry. J Dent Educ 1986: 50: 716721.
  • 27
    Gillet D, Quinton A, Jeannel A. Is there a link between writing ability, drawing aptitude and manual skills of dental students? Eur J Dent Educ 2002: 6: 6973.
    Direct Link:
  • 28
    Giuliani M, Lajolo C, Clemente L, et al. Is manual dexterity essential in the selection of dental students? Br Dent J 2007: 203: 149155.
  • 29
    Risucci DA. Visual spatial perception and surgical competence. Am J Surg 2002: 184: 291295.
  • 30
    Wanzel KR, Hamstra SJ, Caminiti MF, Anastakis DJ, Grober ED, Reznick RK. Visual-spatial ability correlates with efficiency of hand motion and successful surgical performance. Surgery 2003: 134: 750757.
  • 31
    Hudson L. Contrary imaginations: a psychological study of the English schoolboy. London: Methuen, 1966.
  • 32
    Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ, Hoffman RR. The Cambridge handbook of expertise performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
  • 33
    Yarrow K, Brown P, Krakauer JW. Inside the brain of an elite athlete: the neural processes that support high achievement in sports. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009: 10: 585596.
  • 34
    Friedl R, Hoppler H, Ecard K, et al. Multimedia-driven teaching significantly improves students’ performance when compared with a print medium. Ann Thorac Surg 2006: 81: 17601766.
  • 35
    Grant H, Dweck CS. Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003: 85: 541553.
  • 36
    Yeo G, Neal A. Subjective cognitive effort: a model of states, traits, and time. J Appl Psychol 2008: 93: 617631.
  • 37
    Mangels JA, Butterfield B, Lamb J, Good C, Dweck CS. Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2006: 1: 7586.
  • 38
    Elliot AJ, Devine PG. On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: dissonance as psychological discomfort. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994: 67: 382394.
  • 39
    Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med 2008: 15: 988994.
  • 40
    Sohn YW, Doane SM, Garrison T. The impact of individual differences and learning context on strategic skill acquisition and transfer. Learn Individ Differ 2006: 16: 1330.
  • 41
    Raven JC, Court JH, Raven J. Manual for Raven’s advanced progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Texas: Harcourt Assessment, 1998.
  • 42
    Peters M, Laeng B, Latham K, Jackson M, Zaiyouna R, Richardson C. A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test – different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain Cogn 1995: 28: 3958.
  • 43
    Smith A. Symbol digit modalities test manual. CA: Western Psychological Services, 1982.
  • 44
    Burns NR, Nettelbeck T. Inspection time and speed of processing: sex differences on perceptual speed but not IT. Pers Individ Dif 2005: 39: 439446.
  • 45
    MacQuarrie TW. Manual of directions: MacQuarrie test for mechanical ability. CA: Test Bureau, 1953.
  • 46
    O’Connor J. Instructions for the O’Connor tweezer dexterity test. IN: Lafayette Instrument, 1998.