SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Airame, S. 2005. Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary: advancing the science and policy of marine protected areas. – In: Scholz, A. and Wright, D. (eds), Place matters: geospatial tools for marine science, conservation, and management in the Pacific Northwest. Oregon State Univ. Press, pp. 91124.
  • Airame, S. et al. 2003. Applying ecological criteria to marine reserve design: A case study from the California Channel Islands. Ecol. Appl. 13: S170S184.
  • Ball, I. R. et al. 2009. Marxan and relatives: software for spatial conservation prioritisation. – In: Moilanen, A. et al (eds), Spatial conservation prioritisation: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 185195.
  • Faith, D. P. et al. 1987. Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69: 5768.
  • Fernandes, L. et al. 2005. Establishing representative no-take areas in the Great Barrier Reef: large-scale implementation of theory on marine protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 19: 17331744.
  • Ferrier, S. and Wintle, B. A. 2009. Quantitative approaches to spatial conservation prioritization: Matching the solution to the need. – In: Moilanen, A. et al (eds), Spatial conservation prioritization, quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 94109.
  • Kirkpatrick, J. B. 1983. An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biol. Conserv. 25: 127134.
  • Klein, C. J. et al. 2008. Striking a balance between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic viability in the design of marine protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 22: 691700.
  • Klein, C. et al. 2009. Incorporating ecological and evolutionary processes into continental scale conservation planning. Ecol. Appl. 19: 206217.
  • Knight, A. T. et al. 2006. Designing systematic conservation assessments that promote effective implementation: best practice from South Africa. Conserv. Biol. 20: 739750.
  • Knight, A. T. et al. 2008. Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conserv. Biol. 22: 610617.
  • Knight, A. T. et al. 2009. From theory to practice: designing and situating spatial prioritization approaches to better implement conservation action. – In: Moilanen, A. et al (eds), Spatial conservation prioritisation: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 249259.
  • Kruskal, J. B. 1964. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit for a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29: 127.
  • Possingham, H. et al. 2000. Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks. – In: Ferson, S. and Burgman, M. (eds), Quantitative methods for conservation biology. Springer, pp. 291305.
  • R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.