Abstract
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Molecular mechanisms in inflammatory bowel disease
- Intestinal cancer as a consequence of a chronic inflammatory disorder
- Responses associated with melatonin in IBD and colon cancer
- New paradigms in inflammatory intestinal disease and colorectal cancer: role of melatonin
- Concluding remarks and open questions
- References
Abstract: In intestinal bowel disease (IBD), immune-mediated conditions exert their effects through various cells and proinflammatory mediators. Recent data support a participation of the endoplasmic reticulum stress and mitochondrial dysfunctions in IBD. Moreover, it is evident that chronic degenerative pathologies, including IBD, share comparable disease mechanisms with alteration in the autophagy mechanisms. Chronic inflammation in IBD exposes these patients to a number of signals known to have tumorigenic effects. This circuitry of inflammation and cancer modifies apoptosis and autophagy, and promotes cellular cycle progression, invasion, and angiogenesis. Melatonin has been shown as a specific antioxidant reducing oxidative damage in both lipid and aqueous cell environments. However, several studies provide further insight into the molecular mechanisms of melatonin action in the colon. In this line, recent data suggest that melatonin modulates autophagy and sirtuin activity. An anti-autophagic property of melatonin has been demonstrated, and it could contribute to its anti-oncogenic activity. Nevertheless, there is no information about whether antitumoral effects of melatonin on colon cancer are dependent on autophagy. Sirtuins have pleiotropic effects on cancer development, being reported both as facilitator and as suppressor of colon cancer development. Sirtuins and melatonin are connected through the circadian clock machinery, and melatonin seems able to correct the alterations in sirtuin activity associated with several pathological conditions. Autophagy and sirtuin activities are linked through 5′AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation, which switches on autophagy and increases sirtuin. The effect of melatonin on AMPK and the impact of this effect on IBD and colon cancer remain an open question.
Molecular mechanisms in inflammatory bowel disease
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Molecular mechanisms in inflammatory bowel disease
- Intestinal cancer as a consequence of a chronic inflammatory disorder
- Responses associated with melatonin in IBD and colon cancer
- New paradigms in inflammatory intestinal disease and colorectal cancer: role of melatonin
- Concluding remarks and open questions
- References
The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to rise, including high-incidence areas (western countries), although both incidence and prevalence are also increasing in historically low-incidence areas such as Latin America, India, and Asia. Factors associated with this ‘westernization’ may be conditioning the expression of these pathologies, and the increase in the incidence among migrants from low- to high-incidence regions in just one generation suggests a strong environmental influence [1].
The hallmark of IBD, including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn′s disease (CD), is chronic, uncontrolled inflammation of the intestinal mucus, which can affect any part of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract with the induction of structural alterations and superficial or transmural granulomatous infiltration [2]. IBD is associated with increased permeability of the epithelial lining of the intestine resulting in continuous stimulation of the mucosal immune system. Luminal bacteria appear to intensify the permeability defect further, establishing a self-sustaining cycle of mucosal inflammation. Intestinal epithelial cells have developed control mechanisms that organize the activation of the intestinal immune system. However, under pathological conditions, bacterial products cross the mucosal barrier and enter the mucus generating a classic immune response [2, 3].
The traditional paradigm for IBD pathogenesis was that cells from the adaptive immune system are the mediators of intestinal inflammation. However, now the participation of the innate immune system in IBD is accepted [4–6]. In this sense, the intestinal epithelium is believed to contribute to innate immunity and to the relative sterility of the mucosal surface, playing an active role in the maintenance of the mucosal immune homeostasis [7]. Likewise, the intestinal epithelium appears to act as a ‘gatekeeper’ that regulates the quality (type) and quantity (number) of leukocytes migrating from the intravascular compartment to the interstitial space (Fig. 1) [8]. This is a complex process mediated by cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules. After exposure to abundant intestinal bacterial antigens or environmental factors, innate immune cells in the intestinal mucus are activated, leading to the overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines. Recently, the IL-23/IL-12 pathway has become the subject of intensive study, and the T-helper type 1 (Th1) cells, driven by IL-12, and interleukin (IL)-17-producing T-helper (Th17) cells, driven by IL-23, have been demonstrated to play an important role in IBD [9]. The Th17 pathway genes are shared between CD and UC, while others are IBD subtype-specific including autophagy genes, or epithelial barrier genes [10, 11] have demonstrated that the IL-23 receptor is vital for the maintenance of many types of CD-T cells that provide early adaptive immune responses to damage. These IL-17-producing effector T cells are crucial for protection against intercellular pathogens and for organ-specific inflammation; the therapeutic disruption of the IL-23 pathway suggests the control of auto-immune inflammation without impairing systemic immunity [12].
Many receptors are implicated in the immunopathogenesis of IBD, and those located on the intestinal mucosal surface constitute an immunological barrier that is in continuous intimate contact with a variety of gut microflora commensals bacteria. Structurally distinct families of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) are pivotal to the control of intestinal mucosal homeostasis [13]. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-1 (NOD-1)-like receptors, both interconnected and coordinated through many signals pathways, provide an integrated system to recognize microbes and microbial molecules and to control antimicrobial effector pathways and adaptive immune responses.
In health, normal PRR signaling protects intestinal barrier integrity and confers commensal tolerance; in this line, different studies suggest that this kind of signaling exerts several important cytoprotective responses in the intestine epithelium, including barrier preservation, inhibition of apoptosis and inflammation, wound repair and regeneration, and autophagy control [13]. Autophagy, traditionally considered as simple as a degradation mechanism, is now believed to have numerous functions and to be able to play complex roles in human diseases [14] including IBD. The progress made by endeavors such as the human genome project and genotyping technologies has made the identification of susceptibility loci for IBD that are shared between UC and CD, but also a number of loci that are disease-specific [15]. Association between two genes, the autophagy-related 16-like 1 gene, ATG16L1 and IRGM, and CD was identified by a genome study and by a wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) study [16, 17].
Aberrant PRR signaling, when it occurs in disease, leads to deleterious tissue injury associated with chronic inflammatory and autoimmune responses. Several studies have reported that expression of TLR-4 is low in the normal colonic mucus and upregulated in UC [18], which suggests the possibility that abnormal bacterial sensing, microbial imbalance or dysbiosis contribute to disease pathogenesis. Along these lines, TLR-2, which belongs to the same TLR membrane surface receptors, recognizes a vast array of microbial components and is involved in different models of IBD [19]. However, TLRs do not discriminate between pathogenic and nonpathogenic microorganisms (commensal), which is important for understanding innate signaling [20]. Concerning NOD-1-like receptors (NLRs), they are expressed not only by DCs [21] but also by Paneth cells and macrophages [22]. NLRs, like TLRs, do not differentiate between pathogenic microorganisms and commensal flora [23]. The first innate receptor strongly linked to the development of chronic intestinal inflammation in a subset of patients with CD is the NOD2/CARD15 [24, 25]. NOD2 mutations are associated with an increased risk of CD, which suggests that the deregulated recognition of intestinal microbes leads to disease in a genetically predisposed individual. Recently, two independent groups have linked NOD2 and autophagy [26, 27]. NOD2 stimulation induces autophagy in dendritic cells (Fig. 1) and requires ATG5, ATG7, and ATG16L1. NOD2-mediated autophagy affects bacterial handling and antigen presentation in dendritic cells. Mutant NOD2 is retained in the cytosol and, therefore, fails to bring Atg16L1 to the plasma membrane, impairing autophagy targeting of bacteria. Autophagy is a key process in host resistence to bacterial infection, although little is known about the steps by which pathogens manipulate the cell to evade the autophagy pathway. The connection between autophagy and IBD development can exist on multiple levels, including intestinal homeostasis, bacterial clearance, cytokine production, and Paneth cell functions [15], whereas some genetic alterations in autophagy promote the development of IBD. In addition, other processes related to IBD pathology (response to pathogens, oxidative damage, and other stresses) would be presumably altered by malfunction of the autophagic process.
When contact is made between microbial components and both NOD2 and TLR, the nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) signaling pathway stimulates the expression of multiple molecules relevant to the pathogenesis of various diseases including IBD and colorectal cancer [28, 29]. NFκB signaling pathway is a complex network that regulates a cellular pathway involved in the expression of a wide variety of genes that play critical roles in immune responses [30]. NFκB is regulated by the IκB family, with seven IκB members including IκBα, IκBβ, IκBγ, IκBε, Bcl-3, and the precursor proteins p100 and p105. Briefly, following stimulation with various inflammatory stimuli, such as certain members of the TNF-α cytokine family, IL-1, TLR ligands, and the p50 subunit mostly, translocates to the nucleus and activates the transcription of various target genes [31]. The result is the augmentation of proinflammatory molecule production during active IBD, including those encoding cytokines such as IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, or TNF-α [32]. These cytokines are primarily secreted by monocytes and macrophages upon activation and induce intestinal macrophages, neutrophils, fibroblasts, and smooth muscle cells to elaborate prostanoids, proteases, and many other mediators of inflammatory tissue responses, and to promote the production of other chemotactic cytokines affecting innate as well as the acquired immune response at mucosal sites [33].
In addition to NFκB activation, commensal bacteria dampen inflammation via nucleocytoplasmic redistribution of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-γ, a member of the nuclear receptor group of transcription factors. PPAR-γ is highly expressed in the intestinal epithelium, immune cells, and adipocytes, and regulates a number of genes participating in metabolism, proliferation, signal transduction, and cellular motility. The role of PPAR-γ in the immune response is through its ability to down-modulate the expression of inflammatory cytokines and to direct immune cell differentiation toward anti-inflammatory phenotypes [34]. A recent animal study by Guri et al. [35] investigated the underlying mechanisms by which the deletion of PPAR-γ in intestinal epithelial cells modulates the severity of experimental IBD, immune cell distribution, and global gene expression. These authors observed that PPAR-γ expression is required for preventing colonic inflammatory lesions, upregulating lysosomal pathway genes and increasing the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. In a different experimental model of IBD, activation of PPAR-γ by different agonists suppresses gut inflammatory lesions, weight loss, and inflammatory mediator expression [36, 37]. Most notably, the PPAR-γ agonist rosiglitazone showed therapeutic efficacy in humans with UC, although this molecule and other drugs belonging to the thiazolidinedione class of antidiabetic drugs are unlikely to be adopted for the treatment of IBD because of their significant side effects [38].
Recent data support the participation of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in IBD. Moreover, it is now evident that chronic degenerative disorders, such as type 2 diabetes or IBD, share comparable disease mechanisms at cellular level, including ER and mitochondrial dysfunction, with inflammatory processes as a key disease-conditioning situation in different tissues [39, 40]. Stress in mitochondria, or the ER independently, causes cell death. However, it has been recently reported that ER stress causes mitochondrial dysfunction via p53-upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA) and tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated protein 1 (TRAP1), located in the mitochondria and associated with the unfolded protein response (UPR) in the ER [41].
Genetic and environmental factors can affect ER stress in the intestinal epithelium and consequently inflammation [42]; genetic factors include either primary or secondary ER stress and environmental factors include bacteria, diet, or drugs. Evidence supports the hypothesis that the ER and the mitochondrial share common mechanisms in triggering the unfolded or misfolded protein response (UPR). Moreover, a protective signaling pathway from the ER to the nucleus controls cell stress response caused by unfolded and/or misfolded proteins. Accumulation of UPR or aggregated proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum results in increased chaperone expression, translational arrest, and induction of autophagy (Fig. 1). UPR signaling is mainly driven by inositol-requiring endoplasmic reticulum-to-nucleus signaling protein 1α (IRE1α), X-box-binding-1 (XBP1) pathway (IRE-XBP1 pathway) [43]. IREα is a transmembrane kinase/endoribonuclease, which initiates the nonconventional splicing of the messenger RNA encoding a key transcription activator XBP1. XBP1 is a key component of the ER stress response and is required for the differentiation and function of certain secretory epithelial cells [44, 45]. IREα is ubiquitous, whereas IRE1β is specifically expressed in the intestinal epithelium. IRE1α exhibits both endoribonuclease, with XBP1 being the only known substrate, and kinase activities that engage both JNK and classical NF-kB pathways. XBP1 deletion causes ER stress in the epithelium, enteritis, increased susceptibility to DSS colitis, lacks Paneth cells in the intestinal epithelia, and decreases crypt bactericidal function, among others.
The full understanding of the different immunological mechanisms implicated in the development and perpetuation of the disease is very important as therapeutic interventions are subject to these mechanisms. In that respect, IBD treatment must be customized for each specific group or subgroup of patients.
Concluding remarks and open questions
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Molecular mechanisms in inflammatory bowel disease
- Intestinal cancer as a consequence of a chronic inflammatory disorder
- Responses associated with melatonin in IBD and colon cancer
- New paradigms in inflammatory intestinal disease and colorectal cancer: role of melatonin
- Concluding remarks and open questions
- References
Current data show that the inhibition of autophagy is a good approach to arrest cancer progression. Furthermore, this treatment sensitizes cancer cells to cytotoxic agents. In most of the available studies, melatonin inhibited autophagy, and this effect was commonly related to its antioxidant activity. Does melatonin regulate the autophagic process by other means? Pharmacological studies with cancer cell lines would likely provide information if melatonin membrane and nuclear receptors, or calmodulin-mediated action, were implicated in its effects in these experimental systems. In addition, there is no information about whether the antitumor effects of melatonin on colon cancer are dependent or independent of autophagy. This should be evaluated.
Genetic alterations in autophagy promote IBD and colorectal cancer. As melatonin has well-known anti-inflammatory properties, it would be interesting to test whether it can prevent the progression from IBD to colon cancer in these genetically altered individuals. Fig. 4 summarizes autophagy-related effects of melatonin on colon cancer development.
Sirtuins have pleiotropic effects on cancer, being depicted both as tumor promoter and as tumor-suppressor agents. It is hypothesized that the important issue is an imbalance of sirtuinas levels, more than whether their levels are high or low. Through the ‘circadian clock connection’, melatonin could balance the distorted levels of sirtuins and promote anti-oncogenic effects. Melatonin could also prevent or correct damage derived from imbalanced levels of sirtuins.
There is no information related to the direct effects of melatonin on sirtuin activity. We have not found an effect of melatonin on SIRT1, SIRT2, or SIRT3 activity with the ‘Fluor-de-Lys’ fluorimetric assay, so further investigation is necessary to clarify this point. In addition, the majority of available data concerns SIRT1. It would be desirable to evaluate the levels of the several human sirtuins in colorectal cancers and to determine whether melatonin alters these levels. Fig. 5 summarizes sirtuin-related effects of melatonin on colon cancer development.
Longevity and cancer are the two faces of the same coin. Resveratrol and rapamycin, the best-known activators of SIRT1 and autophagy, respectively, have been named ‘anti-aging drugs’ [205]. Both molecules modulate AMPK, which seems to be a central regulator of cell metabolism and to control the delicate equilibrium between prosurvival and prodeath pathways. The effect of melatonin, another molecule with known anti-aging properties via AMPK, as well as the impact of this action on IBD and colorectal cancer remains to be investigated.