Get access

Effects of different pedalling techniques on muscle fatigue and mechanical efficiency during prolonged cycling

Authors

  • J. Theurel,

    1. Institute of Movement Sciences E-J Marey, UMR CNRS 6233, Aix-Marseille University, Parc Scientifique et Technologique de Luminy, Marseille, France
    2. INSERM U887 Laboratory, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Bourgogne, Dijon, France
    Search for more papers by this author
  • M. Crepin,

    1. Institute of Movement Sciences E-J Marey, UMR CNRS 6233, Aix-Marseille University, Parc Scientifique et Technologique de Luminy, Marseille, France
    Search for more papers by this author
  • M. Foissac,

    1. Oxylane Research, Villeneuve d'Ascq cedex, France
    Search for more papers by this author
  • J. J. Temprado

    1. Institute of Movement Sciences E-J Marey, UMR CNRS 6233, Aix-Marseille University, Parc Scientifique et Technologique de Luminy, Marseille, France
    Search for more papers by this author

Corresponding author: J. Theurel, Faculté des Sciences du Sport - UFR STAPS, Campus Universitaire Montmuzard, BP 27 877 – 21 078 Dijon Cedex, France. Tel: +33 3 80 39 67 61, Fax: +33 3 80 39 67 02, E-mail: jean.theurel@u-bourgogne.fr

Abstract

The present study aimed to test the influence of the pedalling technique on the occurrence of muscular fatigue and on the energetic demand during prolonged constant-load cycling exercise. Subjects performed two prolonged (45 min) cycling sessions at constant intensity (75% of maximal aerobic power). In a random order, participants cycled either with their preferred technique (PT) during one session or were helped by a visual force-feedback to modify their pedalling pattern during the other one (FB). Index of pedalling effectiveness was significantly (P<0.05) improved during FB (41.4±5.5%); compared with PT (36.6±4.1%). Prolonged cycling induced a significant reduction of maximal power output, which was greater after PT (−15±9%) than after FB (−7±12%). During steady-state FB, vastus lateralis muscle activity was significantly (P<0.05) reduced, whereas biceps femoris muscles activities increased compared with PT. Gross efficiency (GE) did not significantly differ between the two sessions, except during the first 15 min of exercise (FB: 19.0±1.9% vs PT: 20.2±1.9%). Although changes in muscular coordination pattern with feedback did not seem to influence GE, it could be mainly responsible for the reduction of muscle fatigue after prolonged cycling.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary