SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • Antimicrobials;
  • female reproductive tract;
  • innate immunity

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Epithelial cells and immune cells in the FRT
  5. Antimicrobials in the upper and lower FRT
  6. Endocrine regulation of antimicrobial protection
  7. Relationship of antimicrobials to STI
  8. Summary
  9. References

Citation Wira CR, Patel MV, Ghosh M, Mukura L, Fahey JV. Innate immunity in the human female reproductive tract: endocrine regulation of endogenous antimicrobial protection against HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. Am J Reprod Immunol 2011; 65: 196–211

Mucosal surfaces of the female reproductive tract (FRT) contain a spectrum of antimicrobials that provide the first line of defense against viruses, bacteria, and fungi that enter the lower FRT. Once thought to be a sterile compartment, the upper FRT is periodically exposed to pathogens throughout the menstrual cycle. More recently, secretions from the upper FRT have been shown to contribute to downstream protection in the lower FRT. In this review, we examine the antimicrobials in FRT secretions made by immune cells and epithelial cells in the upper and lower FRT that contribute to innate protection. Because each site is hormonally regulated to maintain fertility, this review focuses on the contributions of hormone balance during the menstrual cycle to innate immune protection. As presented in this review, studies from our laboratory and others demonstrate that sex hormones regulate antimicrobials produced by innate immune cells throughout the FRT. The goal of this review is to examine the spectrum of antimicrobials in the FRT and the ways in which they are regulated to provide protection against pathogens that compromise reproductive health and threaten the lives of women.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Epithelial cells and immune cells in the FRT
  5. Antimicrobials in the upper and lower FRT
  6. Endocrine regulation of antimicrobial protection
  7. Relationship of antimicrobials to STI
  8. Summary
  9. References

Sexually transmitted infections (STI) are a major worldwide health problem.1 Despite extensive efforts, only limited success has been achieved in dealing with a growing list of STI that include bacteria (group B streptococcus, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Treponema pallidum), parasites (Trichomonas vaginalis), and viruses [herpes simplex (HSV), human papilloma (HPV) and human immunodeficiency (HIV) virus]. Taken together, more than 20 pathogens, all of which are transmissible through sexual intercourse, account for approximately 340 million new STI cases annually.2

Since 1975, HIV has accounted for approximately 25 million deaths with an additional 33.4 million people (of which approximately 50% are female) currently infected worldwide.3 In sub-Saharan Africa, the area hardest hit by the pandemic, women living with HIV/AIDS make up approximately 60% of the number of HIV-infected people.3 Depending on the African country analyzed, infection rates vary from 5 to 25% of the population. Not widely recognized are recent findings that major cities in the United States such are Washington DC have infection rates (approximately 3%) that are comparable to those seen in Africa.4

The mucosal surfaces of the human FRT are protected against pathogens by both the adaptive and the innate immune systems. Important components of innate defense are the antimicrobials in fluids that bathe the luminal surfaces of the upper (Fallopian tubes, uterus and endocervix) and lower (ectocervix and vagina) FRT. This thin layer of fluid covers all luminal surfaces and contains multiple antimicrobial factors secreted by epithelial cells and immune cells strategically distributed throughout the FRT. These secretions contribute in a number of ways to the defense of the FRT against bacterial, viral and fungal pathogens. In addition to physically protecting columnar and squamous epithelial cells that line the FRT, secretions promote ciliary clearance and contain mucus that serves both as a physical barrier and as a trap for bacteria and viruses. FRT secretions contain surfactant proteins that enhance phagocytosis of bacteria, immunoglobulins that bind bacteria, and lactoferrin that deprives bacteria of iron. Also present are antimicrobials that contribute to the protective shield against potential pathogens.

As presented in this review, FRT secretions contain a spectrum of antimicrobials totaling more that 20 molecules that are able to kill or inhibit bacteria, viruses, and fungi without inducing inflammation. Because survival depends on protection against pathogens, antimicrobial redundancy and synergism have evolved to provide a spectrum of protection greater than that present with a single factor.5 Less well recognized is the realization that antimicrobials in FRT tissues and secretions are under hormonal control. As a result, some antimicrobials are enhanced while others are suppressed in response to estradiol and/or progesterone. These changes lead to protection against STI at times during the menstrual cycle when aspects of the adaptive immune system are suppressed.6 Our goal in this review is to identify the innate immune cells at different sites in the FRT that provide antimicrobial protection, characterize the antimicrobials present in FRT secretions of the upper and lower FRT, and examine the changes in antimicrobials expression that occurs during the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and following menopause. Important biologic factors are presented under the broad headings of epithelial cells and immune cells in the FRT; antimicrobials in the upper and lower FRT; endocrine regulation of antimicrobial protection; and relationship of antimicrobials to STI.

Epithelial cells and immune cells in the FRT

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Epithelial cells and immune cells in the FRT
  5. Antimicrobials in the upper and lower FRT
  6. Endocrine regulation of antimicrobial protection
  7. Relationship of antimicrobials to STI
  8. Summary
  9. References

Leukocytes in the FRT play a central role in providing cellular, humoral, and innate immune protection against bacterial and viral invasion. Using human reproductive tract tissues dispersed by enzymatic digestion prior to quantitative flow cytometry, Givan et al.7 demonstrated that CD3+ T lymphocytes were present in substantial numbers, not only in the uterine endometrium, but throughout the FRT, including the ovary, Fallopian tube, uterine endometrium, endocervix, ectocervix, and vagina. Using three-color FACS analysis, leukocytes were found to be 6–20% of the total number of cells within the FRT; the uterine endometrium and Fallopian tube contained a higher proportion of leukocytes (mean of 14 ± 2% in the uterine endometrium) relative to other sites within the FRT. T lymphocytes were a major constituent of reproductive tract leukocytes from all tissues. Fallopian tubes contained granulocytes as a second major constituent. Granulocytes were significantly less numerous in the other tissues. All tissues contained B-lymphocytes and monocytes as clearly detectable but minor components. The proportions of leukocyte subsets in tissues from pre-menopausal women showed only small differences related to stage of the menstrual cycle. Numbers of leukocytes were decreased in post-menopausal endometrial samples relative to pre-menopausal samples, when analyzed on a percentage of total cells or per gram basis, possibly reflecting, in part, a decreased population of immune cells in post-menopausal endometrium.

Antimicrobials in the upper and lower FRT

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Epithelial cells and immune cells in the FRT
  5. Antimicrobials in the upper and lower FRT
  6. Endocrine regulation of antimicrobial protection
  7. Relationship of antimicrobials to STI
  8. Summary
  9. References

The complete antimicrobial repertoire in FRT secretions is unknown. Furthermore, there is considerable variability in reports of antimicrobial concentrations within the FRT. While the best-studied antimicrobials present in the FRT are shown in Table I, this list is incomplete in that other molecules exist in the FRT whose functional capacity is understudied (Table II).

Table I.   Antimicrobials in the FRT
AntimicrobialsLocationSourceDetectionReferences
RNAIHWBELISA
  1. U, upper; L, lower; FRT, female reproductive tract; VF, vaginal fluid; CM, cervical mucus; UEC, upper FRT epithelial cells; VEC, lower FRT epithelial cells; STC, stromal fibroblasts; NK, natural killer; SLPI, secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor.

α-defensins (HNP1–3)U/L FRT, VF, CMNeutrophilsNDYesYesND12,39,42,49,121–125
MacrophagesNDYesNDND
MonocytesNDYesNDND
β-defensins (HBD1–4)U/L FRT, VF, CMUECYesNDNDYes12,39,42,49,72,78,124–127
VECYesNDNDYes
MacrophagesYesYesNDND
MonocytesYesYesNDND
Dendritic CellsYesNDNDND
MIP3α/CCL20U/L FRT, VFUECYesNDNDYes38,128 (M. Ghosh, J. V. Fahey, C. R. Wira, in preparation)
VECYesNDNDYes
ElafinU/LFRT, CM, VFUECYesYesNDYes29,44,46,129 ( M. V. Patel, C. R. Wira, in preparation)
VECNDYesNDYes
NeutrophilsYesYesNDND
SLPIU/L FRT, CM, VFUECYesYesYesYes39,40,42,43,45,46,49,59,76,124,125,130–132
Superficial VECYesYesNDND
Cathelicidin LL37U/L FRT, VF, CM.NeutrophilsNDNDYesND42,124,133,134
Basal VECYesYesYesYes
CalprotectinL FRT, VF, CM.NeutrophilsNDNDNDND13,42,125,135,136
MonocytesYesNDNDYes
Superficial VECNDYesNDND
LysozymeL FRT, VF, CM.NeutrophilsNDNDNDYes41,42,49,125,137–139
LactoferrinL FRT, VF, CMNeutrophilsNDNDNDYes41,42,49,59,81,125,139,140
Table II.   Potential Antimicrobial Compounds in the FRT
NameFound in FRT?Epithelial origin?Bacteriocidal?Other sitesAnti-HIV?CommentsReferences
  1. FRT, female reproductive tract; MRT, male reproductive tract; SLPI, secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor; SP, surfactant protein; TSP-1, thrombospondin.

SP-DFRT and MRTYesYes (Chlamydia)Respiratory?Lectin-binding domains141–143
SP-AFRT, MRTYes (prostate, vagina)YesRespiratory?Lectin-binding domains144–146
TSP-1FRT (cervical cancer)YesYesOralYesAngiogenic inhibitor; anti-HIV in saliva147–149
Eppin and HE4MRTYes (epididymis)YesSeminal fluid?Androgen regulated; SLPI related150,151
LipophilinMRT (prostate, testis); FRT (uterus, ovary)?YesTears, mammary glands, nasal fluids?Steroid hormone regulated152,153
Lipocalin (glycodelin)MRT, FRTYesYes (also fungicide)Tears, nasal fluids? 153–155
HistonesYesYesYesColon, nasal fluids, skinYes 13,156–158

Endogenous antimicrobials are small peptides mainly produced by epithelial and immune cells (leukocytes) that possess antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral activity against a broad range of pathogens.8 They have distinct immunomodulatory functions including chemotaxis, cell proliferation, cytokine induction, and regulation of antigen uptake, which can be independent of or complementary to their direct protective effects.9 Importantly, while each antimicrobial is addressed individually below, in vivo they function as part of an intricate interconnected system. Several antimicrobials, for example, human beta defensin (HBD)2 and cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide LL-37,10 secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) and lysozyme,11 lactoferrin and lysozyme,11 display synergistic effects that potentially increase innate immune protection in the FRT.5

Despite their structural and functional differences, antimicrobials possess some common elements. They are generally cationic amphipathic molecules that can directly interact with cell membranes with high acidic phospholipid content, subsequently forming pores that destabilize cells through the abolition of pH and ionic concentration gradients.5,9,12,13 The varying composition of cell membranes has been postulated as a reason for the differential activity of antimicrobials toward a range of pathogens.12 In addition, they are susceptible to the effects of pH, ion concentration (e.g. Na+, Mg2+), serum proteins, and protease inhibitor levels in the FRT, many of which, especially at higher physiological concentrations, are antagonistic toward antimicrobial activity.9,12,14–19

Human defensins cluster on chromosome 8 and are composed of two main functional families: alpha and beta defensins.12,13 They have a common β-sheet structure and unique disulfide linkages between six specific conserved cysteine residues.8,12,13 There are six alpha defensins: human neutrophil peptide (HNP)1–4 and human defensin (HD) 5 and 6. HNPs 1–3 share a high degree of homology with only the amino terminal amino acid differing between them. Alpha defensins are synthesized as pre-prodefensins that are cleaved by proteases to create an active peptide which displays antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and yeast; and antiviral effects against HIV-1, HSV-1, and HSV-2.12 Intriguingly, however, HD5 and HD6 enhance HIV replication by themselves as well as in the presence of gonorrheal infection.20 However, the exact mechanism of infection remains to be determined.

Beta defensins HBD1–6 are structurally similar to alpha defensins and have broad inhibitory activity against a range of pathogens including HIV-1.12 Genome scans have revealed at least 28 putative human beta defensins; though, only six have been discovered, of which four are present in the FRT.8,12,13 HBD1–3 have direct and indirect anti-HIV-1 activity.21,22 Similar to other antimicrobials, they interact directly with the viral envelope.12,21 Furthermore, they act upon target cell populations to decrease levels of the HIV-1 CXCR4 co-receptor as well as inhibit the early steps of viral replication.21–23

Cathelicidins are a family of cationic antimicrobial peptides of which only one is found in humans, cathelicidin (hCAP-18/LL-37).24 LL-37 is present in the FRT and is composed of three domains: a signal peptide region, an N-terminal cathelin-like domain, and a C-terminal antimicrobial domain.9,24 The mature peptide LL-37 is generated from hCAP-18 by protease cleavage, is broadly antibacterial, and inhibits HIV-1 replication in vitro independently of changes in HIV-1 co-receptor expression. Intriguingly, the cathelin-domain also has antibacterial activity but no disclosed anti-HIV-1 activity.5,25 Uniquely, hCAP-18 is cleaved to form ALL-38 by gastricsin, a protease present in seminal fluid that is reaction dependent on low pH found in the vagina.26 ALL-38 has a similar antibacterial profile to LL-37, but its anti-HIV activity is unknown. This remarkable mechanism for antimicrobial activation highlights the importance of male sexual fluids in modulating the protective response in the FRT.9,13

Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor and Elafin, located together on chromosome 20, are members of whey acidic protein (WAP) family that possess a conserved whey four disulfide core domain (WFDC).27,28 The pair are endogenous protease inhibitors involved in the control of inflammatory responses and tissue remodeling.27,28 Unlike SLPI, Elafin is relatively restricted in its target population acting mainly on neutrophil and pancreatic elastase and neutrophil proteinase 3. Both proteins also demonstrate anti-HIV-1 activity that is independent of their protease inhibitor function.27–30 SLPI, the better studied of the pair, inhibits HIV-1 infection by competing for annexin-binding sites on the cell membrane and thus decreasing viral entry into a cell.27,28,31,32 The cationic nature of SLPI may also allow it to directly destabilize viral envelop. The mechanism for Elafin inhibition of HIV-1 is unknown, but may be similar to SLPI given their homology (approximately 40%).29,30

Lysozyme, another component of FRT secretions, derives its antibacterial activity from the ability to cleave peptidoglycan present on bacterial cell walls.13 Like other antimicrobials, it can directly interact with cell membranes via its positively charged amino acids.13,33 It inhibits HIV-1 infection of target cells, most likely via its HL9 and HL18 peptide regions, by blocking viral entry and replication.8,34,35 Lactoferrin, a homolog of the iron-carrier protein transferrin, inhibits bacterial growth by sequestering iron under acidic conditions similar to those in the lower FRT.13 It blocks HIV-1 infection of target cells by interfering with viral fusion and entry through interactions with the V3 loop of HIV-1 gp120.8,36 Furthermore, it inhibits HIV-1 adsorption to target cells. MIP3α/CCL20 is a neutrophil chemoattractant, and similar to other chemokines and cytokines, also functions as an antimicrobial agent.37 Recently, it was shown to inhibit HIV-1 infection of target cells through an unknown mechanism.38

Endocrine regulation of antimicrobial protection

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Epithelial cells and immune cells in the FRT
  5. Antimicrobials in the upper and lower FRT
  6. Endocrine regulation of antimicrobial protection
  7. Relationship of antimicrobials to STI
  8. Summary
  9. References

Antimicrobial Changes During the Menstrual cycle

The pioneering studies of Schumacher in the 1960s and 1970s demonstrated that components of the reproductive tract milieu vary with specific stages of the menstrual cycle. For example, IgG and IgA in cervical mucus both decrease at ovulation but remain elevated during the proliferative and secretory phases of the cycle. Reflecting this initial work, other investigators have shown that, in addition to antibodies, specific cytokines, chemokines and antimicrobials also change with the menstrual cycle.

As seen in Table III, HNPs 1–3, HBD2, lactoferrin, and SLPI in cervico-vaginal lavages (CVL) transiently and dramatically decrease at mid-cycle/ovulation, before increasing during the latter portion of the secretory phase.39,40 A similar trend for lysozyme has also been reported elsewhere.41 The greatest decreases were observed in HNPs 1–3 (80%) and HBD2 (70%).39 Multiple cytokines, which potentially have antimicrobial activity,37 also demonstrated this trend.39 Some of the highest concentrations of antimicrobials (HNPs 1–3, HBD2 and SLPI) were detected during the menstrual phase. However, this is likely due to blood contamination of CVL during endometrial breakdown and may not reflect endogenous FRT production. In contrast to CVL findings, studies using tampons for collection of vaginal fluid reported increased levels of HNPs 1–3, HBD2, and lysozyme while lactoferrin, HBD1, and SLPI decreased from proliferative to secretory stages of the menstrual cycle with no apparent mid-cycle drop.42 Another study used Dacron swabs and found that SLPI peaked at mid-cycle compared to proliferative and secretory stages.43 It remains to be determined which recovery technique (CVL, tampon, or swab) most accurately reflects antimicrobial levels in the lower FRT. Whether upper FRT secretions, which contain elevated levels of antimicrobials at mid-cycle, mix with vaginal fluid to mask cycle-dependent differences remains to be determined. Furthermore, it is important to accurately identify the cycle stage from which samples are recovered. Thus, self-reporting based upon the idealized 28-day cycle, while useful in some cases, can be replaced by direct measurement of serum estradiol and progesterone.

Table III.   Antimicrobial Changes in Cervical Vaginal Secretions from the Female Reproductive Tract Attributed to Menstrual Status, Pregnancy, and Contraceptive Use
AntimicrobialProliferativeMid-cycleSecretoryPregnancyPost-menopausalOral contraceptiveReferences
  1. + symbols indicate level of each antimicrobial determined in CVL relative to the proliferative phase with increasing numbers of + symbols indicating higher levels of antimicrobial.

  2. NC, no change; ND, not determined; SLPI, secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor.

α-defensins (HNP1–3)++++++++PresentNDNC39,49,53
SLPI+++++++++PresentDecreaseND39,49,50,52,76,159
Lysozyme+++++++NDNDNC39,41,49
Lactoferrin+++++++++NDNDNC39,41,49,140
β-defensin 1NDPresentNDND50,52
β-defensin 2+++++++++PresentNDNC39,49,50,52
β-defensin 3NDPresentNDDecrease49,50,52,78
β-defensin 4NDPresentNDND78
MIP3α/CCL20NDPresentNDNDM. Ghosh, J. V. Fahey, C. R. Wira (in preparation)
ElafinNDPresentNDND52

Within the upper FRT, HBD1–4 mRNA levels peak in endometrial tissue at different times during the menstrual cycle with HBD4 highest during the proliferative phase and HBD2 peaking at menstruation. Similar to HBD2, Elafin increases late in the cycle,44 while HBD1 is highest during the mid-secretory stage. In contrast, HBD3 is maximal at early and late secretory, with a transient decline at mid-secretory. SLPI mRNA and protein also peak during the secretory phase.45 In the Fallopian tube, SLPI and Elafin mRNA expression remain constant across the cycle.46 The reason behind this exquisite regulation of upper FRT antimicrobial expression may reside either in their unique antimicrobial activities or in non-antimicrobial functions related to fertility that remain to be determined.

Over 90% of sexually active women in the United States have used some form of contraception at least once.47 Given its widespread use, the effect of hormonal contraceptives on antimicrobial levels is understudied. In a seminal study, Schumacher48 demonstrated that sequential oral contraceptives suppress the cyclic changes of a spectrum of proteins including IgG, IgA, and lysozyme. In other studies with a combination oral contraceptive, no effect on antimicrobial expression was observed except for a significant decrease in HBD3 when compared to the secretory phase.49 In the upper FRT, women taking the combined oral contraceptive had decreased SLPI in luminal epithelial secretions compared to women in the proliferative phase.50 Future studies need to separate the different classes of oral contraceptives to determine their effects on the innate immune system throughout the FRT.

Antimicrobial Activity in FRT of Pregnant Women

Traditionally, pregnancy has been defined as a general state of immune suppression. However, this notion has been challenged recently with an evolution of our understanding; pregnancy seems to be both a pro-inflammatory and an anti-inflammatory state depending on the stage of gestation (reviewed by Ref. 51). The trophoblast, which is the cellular unit of the placenta, acts as an immune-regulatory interface between the maternal and fetal units. The placenta can recognize microorganisms and initiate response by producing cytokines, chemokines, and antimicrobials. Specifically, trophoblastic cells have been shown to produce HBDs, SLPI, and IFNβ in response to pathogenic stimuli.

Protection of the uterus and prevention of infection is of critical importance during pregnancy. A host of endogenous antimicrobials play an active role in protecting the pregnant uterus. Both alpha (HNPs) and beta (HBDs) defensins have been detected in amniotic fluid, chorion, and placenta (reviewed by Ref. 52). Defensins have also been detected in the cervical mucus plug that, during pregnancy, forms a physical barrier between the vagina and the uterus and prevents the upward movement of harmful pathogens. In addition, HNPs have been detected in the vernix caseosa (substance covering the skin of fetus and newborn), which has antimicrobial properties and protects the fetus during delivery and immediately after birth. Increases in the levels of alpha and beta defensins in amniotic fluid are strongly indicative of uterine inflammation or infection which can result in preterm labor and delivery.52 Both alpha and beta defensins have been detected in vaginal fluids of healthy pregnant women.53 However, changes in vaginal microflora during pregnancy correlate with the presence of alpha defensins in vaginal fluid.54 Asymptomatic trichomoniasis in pregnancy has also been associated with higher HNPs in vaginal fluids.55

Both SLPI and Elafin are present in the healthy pregnant uterus.56 SLPI has been detected in the decidua, amnion epithelium, vernix caseosa, and at very high concentrations (750 mg/g) in cervical mucus plugs.52 Elafin, in contrast, is confined to fetal membranes and placenta at term pregnancy. Both SLPI and Elafin possess anti-protease/anti-inflammatory activities beyond their antimicrobial capabilities and are believed to regulate inflammation during pregnancy and labor. Both SLPI and Elafin have been reported to decrease significantly in women with premature rupture of membrane (PROM). This correlates with increases in protease activity [matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) and neutrophil elastase] that contribute to rupture and/or infection. Interestingly, although levels of Elafin in amnion epithelium have been reported to rise in chorioamnionitis, SLPI concentrations did not appear to change. It has been suggested that this might occur as SLPI is degraded by certain pathogens (Trichomonas,57Pseudomonas,58Staphylococcus aureus28 and Chlamydia46). In studies using CVL, SLPI was found to be increased in pregnant women,56 but decreased in the presence of bacterial vaginosis (BV).59 Sachdeva et al.60 confirmed these findings and further demonstrated that SLPI is down-regulated in HIV-infected pregnant women. Elafin has also been detected in pregnant CVLs and reported to be diminished by BV.61

In addition to SLPI, Elafin and the defensins, several other natural antimicrobials are also present in the pregnant uterus although most have not been studied in great detail. Lactoferrin is present during pregnancy and has been detected in amniotic fluid, cervical mucus, and vernix caseosa.52 Surfactant protein A (SP-A) is a lung antimicrobial that can facilitate phagocytosis of pathogens; it is expressed by amniotic epithelium, trophoblast, and amniotic macrophages although the main source is fetal lung.

Antimicrobial Activity in FRT of Post-Menopausal Women

It is well established that the innate immune system changes with aging or immune senescence.62–65 In elderly patients, NK cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, and neutrophils show impaired function as well as decreased toll-like receptor (TLR)-mediated cytokine responses. Aging has been shown to impair responses to viral infections including HIV, HSV, CMV, and Influenza; one mechanism is thought to be the functional impairment of plasmacytoid dendritic cells, the major producer of type I interferons, which are essential for combating viral infections.66

Several studies have demonstrated that innate immune factors are compromised in the FRT of post-menopausal women. A general decline in several immunomodulatory factors has been reported that appear to be age related as well as attributed to the loss of endocrine responsiveness.67 As multiple immune factors of the FRT are estrogen responsive, the loss of estrogen with aging results in loss of TLR function, secretory antimicrobial components, commensal lactobacilli, and acidity of vaginal microenvironment.68 Vaginal epithelium thins significantly in the non-estrogenic post-menopausal state. There is also lack of production of cervical mucus, which itself is a protective barrier against pathogens.69 Gender-specific decline of immune responses in the elderly have been described (reviewed by Refs 62,70). Post-menopausal women show higher chronic levels of proinflammatory cytokines IL-6, MCP1, and TNFα as well as a reduced ability to respond to pathogens or stimuli (Reviewed by Refs 62,70). Mselle et al.71 have shown that inactive endometrium has lower numbers of NK cells compared to endometrium of cycling women.

A few studies have addressed the loss of specific antimicrobials in the FRT of post-menopausal women. Production of defensins has been shown to change under the influence of sex hormones.72 Han et al.,73 demonstrated that estradiol can enhance the production of HBD2 whereas progesterone can decrease it. Fahey et al.74 reported a loss of antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in the uterine secretions of post-menopausal women and correlated this with a loss of SLPI secretion, a molecule well known for bactericidal and viricidal activity.74,75 Shimoya et al.76 confirmed lower SLPI levels in cervical vaginal secretions from post-menopausal women and further showed that hormone replacement therapy in elderly women increased SLPI levels.

In our studies (M. Ghosh, J. V. Fahey, S. Cu-Uvin, C. R. Wira, unpublished observations), we observed a reduction in anti-HIV activity in CVL from post-menopausal compared to pre-menopausal women. Using Luminex analyses we found that post-menopausal CVL contained higher levels of proinflammatory IL1α and lower levels of Elafin (Ghosh, unpublished observation) when compared to pre-menopausal controls. This suggests that changes in innate immune components in FRT secretions might increase the risk of infection by HIV and other STIs in post-menopausal women.

Direct and Indirect Effects of Sex Hormones on Upper Versus Lower FRT Antimicrobials

Immune cells in the pre-menopausal FRT exist in an environment that is continuously exposed to changing levels of sex hormones. As previously described, several antimicrobials in CVL or CVM vary with stage of the menstrual cycle. However, the contribution of individual cell types within the FRT toward total antimicrobial production remains relatively understudied with the bulk of research being performed on FRT epithelial cells. As seen in Table IV, we and others have isolated purified uterine epithelial and stromal cells from hysterectomy patients. Under estradiol stimulation, uterine epithelial cells upregulate the production of SLPI, HBD2 and Elafin.72,77 However, the antimicrobial profile of human uterine stromal cells and their response to hormonal stimulation is unknown. In the lower FRT, we observed a very different response, with vaginal epithelial cells decreasing the secretion of HBD2 and Elafin after 48 hrs of estradiol treatment (Patel et al. unpublished observation). Inhibition progressively increases from 10−8 to 10−10m. In our system, uterine epithelial cells were strong constitutive producers of MIP3α38– an antimicrobial absent from vaginal epithelial cell cultures (Patel et al. unpublished observation). Thus, the vaginal compartment possesses markedly dissimilar responses compared to the uterus – possibly the result of their different embryonic origins, or the differential expression of co-activator molecules in epithelial cells. Estradiol can also modulate innate immune responses to pathogenic stimuli. For example, estradiol inhibits the LPS-mediated upregulation of IL-6 in uterine epithelial cells.72,77 Whether estradiol influences antimicrobial production in a similar manner remains unknown.

Table IV.   Direct Hormonal Effects on Antimicrobial Production by Upper and Lower Female Reproductive Tract (FRT) Epithelial Cells
CellsAntimicrobialsConstitutiveHormoneReferences
EstrogenProgesterone
  1. NC, no change; ND, not determined; SLPI, secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor; HBD, human beta defensin.

Upper FRT epithelialHBD2PresentIncreaseND72
HBD3PresentNDIncrease78
HBD4PresentNDIncrease78
SLPIPresentIncreaseNC72
ElafinPresentIncreaseNDJ. V. Fahey, C.R. Wira (in preparation)
Lower FRT epithelialHBD2PresentDecreaseNCM.V. Patel, C.R. Wira (in preparation)
HBD3NDNDND 
HBD4NDNDND 
SLPIPresentNDND 
ElafinPresentDecreaseNCM.V. Patel, C.R. Wira (in preparation)

The effects of progesterone upon epithelial cells are less well studied (Table IV). We found that progesterone has no effect on HBD2 and Elafin production by fresh primary human vaginal epithelial cells (Patel et al. unpublished observation). Endometrial explants from the proliferative or secretory phase show a differential response to progesterone. Proliferative phase tissue decreased the mRNA production of HBD1 and HBD2 but increased SLPI in response to progesterone (10−6 m).78 In contrast, no progesterone effect was observed with secretory tissue. As neither estradiol nor progesterone exists alone in the FRT, further studies are needed to investigate the combined effects of these hormones to more accurately represent the in vivo environment.

Studies on immune cells recovered from the FRT are limited. It is essential to understand the effects of hormonal stimulation on these cells, as they are a rich source of antimicrobials. For example, neutrophils contain high concentrations of alpha defensins in their granules and are present in greater numbers in the upper FRT during ovulation.77 It is not unreasonable to ask whether their antimicrobial production, like that of epithelial cells, also changes with hormonal balance. Studying hormonal effects on systemic immune cells may not be an appropriate system for defining the responses of FRT mucosal immune cells. Immune cells in the FRT have a different phenotype from those in systemic circulation.79 For example, uterine NK cells express higher levels of specific markers and have greater anti-HIV activity than blood NK cells.80 Neutrophils and macrophages also possess distinct characteristics from their counterparts in the blood. FRT neutrophils have lower levels of lactoferrin and matrix metaloproteinase-9, but appear to be primed for a more rapid induction of innate immune defense.81

Biologic Activity of Antimicrobials

Typically, levels of antimicrobials in mucosal fluids are measured by ELISA. In some cases, antimicrobial levels correlate with biologic activity while others do not.82 As discussed elsewhere, molecules in CVL may be quantitatively detected in an ELISA, but might not be biologically active, depending on the local environment in FRT secretions.83 Several factors determine biologic activity of antimicrobials in the FRT.

Proteases

Female reproductive tract secretions contain both proteases and protease inhibitors, many of which are hormonally regulated.69 For example, several proteases with trypsin-like activity in cervical vaginal secretions are regulated throughout the menstrual cycle with levels highest at ovulation and during the secretory phase. Families of proteases include cathepsins, kallikreins, MMPs, CD26, and others, all of which are responsible for activating and/or deactivating a variety of antimicrobial peptides.84 In addition, antimicrobials such as SLPI and Elafin are themselves protease inhibitors and can therefore regulate the endogenous proteases.

Effects of microenvironment

Factors such as pH, salt, serum, and presence of sperm can affect biologic activity of antimicrobials. For example, the activity of the antimicrobial LL-37 is altered in the presence of sperm. LL-37 is processed and activated by prostate-derived protease gastricsin in a pH-dependent manner.26 Many antimicrobials are sensitive to salt as well as the presence of serum. The activity and efficacy of defensins have been shown to change with pH and salt concentration.85 Daher et al.16 showed that the addition of serum inhibited neutralization of HSV by HNPs. More recently, Mackewicz et al.86 demonstrated that HIV inhibition by alpha defensins was almost completely abrogated by the presence of 10% fetal calf serum.

Synergy between antimicrobials

Many antimicrobials present in mucosal fluids can act in synergy. Lactoferrin and lysozyme have been shown to be synergistic against Gram-negative bacteria.87 HBD2 and LL-37 also show synergistic effects.10 Singh et al.11 has shown that SLPI, lactoferrin, and lysozyme, in combination, have significantly higher antimicrobial activity than each of the molecules individually. Van Wetering et al.88 has also demonstrated that alpha defensins can enhance production of SLPI and Elafin by bronchial epithelial cells. Overall, endogenous antimicrobials interact in a complex pattern with biologic activity dependent on a host of factors. This finding most likely explains why a single mucosal immune factor is unlikely to be utilized as a therapeutic intervention against a given pathogen.

Relationship of antimicrobials to STI

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Epithelial cells and immune cells in the FRT
  5. Antimicrobials in the upper and lower FRT
  6. Endocrine regulation of antimicrobial protection
  7. Relationship of antimicrobials to STI
  8. Summary
  9. References

The secretions of the FRT mucosa contain a spectrum of immune factors, many of which have direct or indirect antimicrobial functions. Antimicrobials present in the FRT are shown in Tables I and II. However, Shaw et al.89 have characterized the protein repertoire of CVL and identified 685 distinct proteins, many of which may have antimicrobial activity. The classical broad-spectrum antimicrobials like defensins are small cationic peptides that can form pores in bacterial cell walls or destabilize charges in viral envelopes, thereby neutralizing them.90,91 Chemokines are traditionally defined based on their ability to attract immune cells to sites of infections thereby connecting the innate to the adaptive immune systems. However, a majority of chemokines are also antimicrobials with activity against bacteria, viruses, and fungi.37

As stated in the introduction of this review, there are an estimated 340 million new cases each year of STI from bacteria (Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis), parasites (Trichomonas vaginalis), and viruses (HSV, HPV, HIV). In addition, the yeast C. albicans, which can exist as a commensal but become pathogenic under certain conditions, is responsible for 85–90% of cases of vulvovaginal candidiasis.92 Many of these organisms are inhibited by antimicrobials through a variety of mechanisms.

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)

Our studies have shown that secretions from primary uterine, Fallopian tube, endocervix, and ectocervix cells are capable of inhibiting both CXCR4 and CCR5 strains of HIV-1.92 Anti-HIV activity was also detected in CVL of both HIV(+) and HIV(−) women82 with considerable decline with disease progression (M. Ghosh, J. V. Fahey, C. R. Wira, in preparation). We and others have demonstrated the presence of numerous antimicrobials in FRT secretions,39,82,84,92,93 many of which have anti-HIV activity. Some of the known anti-HIV molecules include SLPI, Elafin, MIP3α, HNP1–3, and HBD2. Chemokines MIP1α, MIP1β, RANTES, and SDF1, also found in secretions and CVL, can act by blocking the co-receptors CXCR4 and CCR5 that HIV needs to bind to infect. In addition, these molecules can also inhibit HIV through post-infection mechanisms.94

Herpes Simplex Virus

HSV-2 is the predominant sexually transmitted strain of Herpes. More than 20% of women of child-bearing age in the United States are HSV-2 seropositive, and in developing countries up to 80% of the population can be infected.95 Studies have shown intrinsic anti-HSV activity in CVL.39,96 Several factors with specific anti-HSV activity have been identified. Lactoferrin and lysozyme have both been shown to inhibit cell-to-cell spread of HSV.97 HNP1–4, HD5, 6, and HBD3 can all inhibit HSV through multiple mechanisms although HBD1 and HBD2 cannot.98 Fakioglu et al.95 reported that HSV-2 down-regulates SLPI suggesting that this is a mechanism for immune evasion.

Human Papilloma Virus

Human Papilloma Virus can be separated into high- and low-risk HPVs depending on their oncogenic potential. Persistent high-risk HPV16 and HPV18 infection are the major causes of cervical cancer. Low-risk HPV types are associated with benign ano-genital warts. Human α-defensins 1–3 and human α-defensin 5 inhibit sexually transmitted HPV infection.99 This may explain why a majority of women infected with HPV clear the infection with time. Another antimicrobial peptide, MIP3α/CCL20, is decreased in squamous intraepithelial lesions caused by HPV16.100 Whether high levels of MIP3α have a direct protective effect against HPV remains to be determined. In addition, Duffy et al.101 have observed that the HPV E6 oncoprotein is able to down-regulate Elafin, perhaps as an immune escape mechanism.

Neisseria gonorrhea

Neisseria gonorrhea is responsible for 700,000 infections in women in the USA each year.102 In women, untreated Neisseria infection can result in pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), which can lead to ectopic pregnancy and an increased risk of infertility. We recently demonstrated that epithelial cell secretions from upper and lower FRT significantly inhibit Neisseria.92 In other studies, Neisseria has been described to be highly sensitive to LL-37.103Neisseria has also been shown to induce HD5 and 6 which in turn enhances HIV replication, underlining the significance of Neisseria as a co-factor in increased HIV transmission.20

Chlamydia trachomatis

Chlamydia infection is a known cause of PID, infertility, and ectopic pregnancy because of scarring of the Fallopian tubes.104Chlamydia is also a co-factor for increased risk of HIV acquisition.105 Several antimicrobials play a role in Chlamydia infection. A decrease in SLPI levels in vaginal secretions is related to infection of the lower reproductive tract by C. trachomatis.106 This implies that reduced levels of SLPI in the lower FRT may increase susceptibility to C. trachomatis infection. Elafin expression is upregulated in oviduct epithelial cells infected with C. trachomatis, suggesting that Elafin plays a role in innate immunity response to chlamydial infection.46 High levels of HBD1 and 2 have been observed in CVL of women infected with Chlamydia.107 Specifically, HNP2 has been shown to inhibit C. trachomatis.108

Candida albicans

Candida is described as a commensal microbe in the vagina because of its presence in up to 20% of` healthy asymptomatic women. However, perturbations of the normal vaginal ecosystem can cause overgrowth of Candida and result in vulvovaginal candidiasis or yeast infection; it affects 75% of all women at least once during their lifetime, and also causes recurrent infections. We tested the effects of upper and lower FRT epithelial cell secretions on both the non-pathogenic yeast and the pathogenic hyphal forms of Candida. These studies indicated that FRT secretions inhibit both forms of Candida. Candida albicans is affected by alpha defensins, LL-37, calprotectin, and HBD1.107,109 In addition, C. albicans is inhibited by both SLPI and Elafin.28

Bacterial Vaginosis

Bacterial vaginosis has been described as a co-factor for HIV acquisition. Cu-Uvin et al.110 have shown BV to be significantly associated with genital tract shedding of HIV. BV is characterized by loss of the normal protective Lactobacilli and overgrowth of diverse anaerobes.111 The microorganisms involved in BV are many, but include Gardnerella vaginalis, Mobiluncus, Bacteroides, and Mycoplasma. Low levels of SLPI and an increase in lactoferrin in cervicovaginal fluid have been associated with BV,59,112 The increase in lactoferrin could be attributed to higher levels of neutrophil activation and degranulation, but was not sufficient to protect against HIV infection.59 Elafin decreases in CVL from women with BV.61

Trichomonas vaginalis

Trichomonas is an extracellular protozoa that adheres to and damages vaginal epithelial cells.113T. vaginalis infection predisposes women to HIV infection and increases HIV shedding in the FRT.114,115Trichomonas vaginalis lipophosphoglycans induce a dose-dependent upregulation of IL-8 and MIP3α in vaginal, ectocervical, and endocervical epithelial cells.116 TV Infection by T. vaginalis results in significantly higher concentrations of vaginal fluid neutrophil defensins and cervical IL-8 in women with asymptomatic trichomoniasis compared to uninfected counterparts.55

Lactobacillus

Multiple distinct species of Lactobacilli colonize the lower genital tract of women. In healthy women of reproductive age, major phylotypes of Lactobacillus includes L. crispatus, L. iners, L. gasseri, L. jensenii, L. gallinarum, and L. vaginialis.117 These commensals play a very important role in maintaining a healthy vaginal ecosystem that protects women against sexually transmitted pathogens. The presence of Lactobacilli creates an acidic environment that is detrimental to pathogens. In addition, they secrete bacteriocins that directly kill pathogens. Loss of Lactobacilli through illness or antibiotics intake increases a woman’s chance of getting infected by a sexually transmitted pathogen.117 However, in one study, lactobacilli were reported to enhance HIV infection.118 We and others have shown that FRT secretions contain antimicrobials that act either alone or in synergy to inhibit a number of sexually transmitted pathogens (J. V. Fahey, R. M. Rossoll, C. R. Wira, unpublished observation).40,82,84,92,119 Recently, we tested FRT secretions against L. crispatus and found no effects.92 This suggests an intricate balance in which constitutive secretions containing endogenous antimicrobials can affect pathogens but not commensals, which maintain a healthy vaginal ecosystem.

Given the number of proteins with antimicrobial properties found in the FRT, it is likely there are many others yet to be discovered. Several promising candidates are shown in Table II. These include SP-A and D, thrombospondin (TSP-1), eppin, HE4, lipophilin, lipocalin, and histones. All are mucosal peptides with antimicrobial functions but have not been studied in great detail. Some of these were discussed in an earlier review.120

Summary

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Epithelial cells and immune cells in the FRT
  5. Antimicrobials in the upper and lower FRT
  6. Endocrine regulation of antimicrobial protection
  7. Relationship of antimicrobials to STI
  8. Summary
  9. References

The complexities of the innate immune system in the human FRT are profound, both between the upper and lower FRT, and in the ways each site is regulated during the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and menopause. These differences have evolved to meet multiple challenges of viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens. The purpose of this review is to emphasize the complexity of innate immune protection in the FRT by including the spectrum of antimicrobials present, the recognition that many work in synergy, and the realization that antimicrobial activity is influenced by the complex milieu of proteases, protease inhibitors, pH, and hormonal balance. Understanding how reproductive demands for fertility interact with the immune system in the FRT are crucial to developing novel approaches to prevent the spread of HIV and other STI.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by AI51877 and AI071761 (awarded to Dr Charles Wira) from NIH.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Epithelial cells and immune cells in the FRT
  5. Antimicrobials in the upper and lower FRT
  6. Endocrine regulation of antimicrobial protection
  7. Relationship of antimicrobials to STI
  8. Summary
  9. References
  • 1
    UNAIDS: AIDS epidemic update 2007.
  • 2
    WHO: Global Prevalence and Incidence of Selected Curable Sexually Transmitted Infections: Overview and Estimates. Geneva, World Health Organisation (WHO), 2001.
  • 3
    UNAIDS: UNAIDS global report 2009.
  • 4
    Greenberg A, Hader S, Masur H, Young A, Skillicorn J, Dieffenbach C: Fighting HIV/AIDS in Washington, D.C. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2009; 28:16771687.
  • 5
    Shafer WM, Agerberth B, Guðmundsson G: Host antimicrobial defence peptides in human disease. In Antimicrobial Peptides and Human Disease, WMShafer (ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2006, pp 6790.
  • 6
    Wira CR, Fahey JV: A new strategy to understand how HIV infects women: identification of a window of vulnerability during the menstrual cycle. AIDS 2008; 22:19091917.
  • 7
    Givan AL, White HD, Stern JE, Colby E, Gosselin EJ, Guyre PM, Wira CR: Flow cytometric analysis of leukocytes in the human female reproductive tract: comparison of fallopian tube, uterus, cervix, and vagina. Am J Reprod Immunol 1997; 38:350359.
  • 8
    Cole AM, Cole AL: Antimicrobial polypeptides are key anti-HIV-1 effector molecules of cervicovaginal host defense. Am J Reprod Immunol 2008; 59:2734.
  • 9
    Shafer WM, Bowdish D, Davidson D, Hancock R: Immunomodulatory properties of defensins and cathelicidins. In Antimicrobial Peptides and Human Disease, WMShafer (ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2006, pp 2766.
  • 10
    Ong PY, Ohtake T, Brandt C, Strickland I, Boguniewicz M, Ganz T, Gallo RL, Leung DY: Endogenous antimicrobial peptides and skin infections in atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:11511160.
  • 11
    Singh PK, Tack BF, McCray Jr PB, Welsh MJ: Synergistic and additive killing by antimicrobial factors found in human airway surface liquid. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2000; 279:L799L805.
  • 12
    Klotman ME, Chang TL: Defensins in innate antiviral immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2006; 6:447456.
  • 13
    Cole AM: Innate host defense of human vaginal and cervical mucosae. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2006; 306:199230.
  • 14
    Lehrer RI, Ganz T, Szklarek D, Selsted ME: Modulation of the in vitro candidacidal activity of human neutrophil defensins by target cell metabolism and divalent cations. J Clin Invest 1988; 81:18291835.
  • 15
    Turner J, Cho Y, Dinh NN, Waring AJ, Lehrer RI: Activities of LL-37, a cathelin-associated antimicrobial peptide of human neutrophils. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42:22062214.
  • 16
    Daher KA, Selsted ME, Lehrer RI: Direct inactivation of viruses by human granulocyte defensins. J Virol 1986; 60:10681074.
  • 17
    Chang TL, Vargas Jr J, DelPortillo A, Klotman ME: Dual role of alpha-defensin-1 in anti-HIV-1 innate immunity. J Clin Invest 2005; 115:765773.
  • 18
    Hristova K, Selsted ME, White SH: Critical role of lipid composition in membrane permeabilization by rabbit neutrophil defensins. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:2422424233.
  • 19
    Lehrer RI, Lichtenstein AK, Ganz T: Defensins: antimicrobial and cytotoxic peptides of mammalian cells. Annu Rev Immunol 1993; 11:105128.
  • 20
    Klotman ME, Rapista A, Teleshova N, Micsenyi A, Jarvis GA, Lu W, Porter E, Chang TL: Neisseria gonorrhoeae-induced human defensins 5 and 6 increase HIV infectivity: role in enhanced transmission. J Immunol 2008; 180:61766185.
  • 21
    Quinones-Mateu ME, Lederman MM, Feng Z, Chakraborty B, Weber J, Rangel HR, Marotta ML, Mirza M, Jiang B, Kiser P, Medvik K, Sieg SF, Weinberg A: Human epithelial beta-defensins 2 and 3 inhibit HIV-1 replication. AIDS 2003; 17:F39F48.
  • 22
    Sun L, Finnegan CM, Kish-Catalone T, Blumenthal R, Garzino-Demo P, La Terra Maggiore GM, Berrone S, Kleinman C, Wu Z, Abdelwahab S, Lu W, Garzino-Demo A: Human beta-defensins suppress human immunodeficiency virus infection: potential role in mucosal protection. J Virol 2005; 79:1431814329.
  • 23
    Weinberg A, Quinones-Mateu ME, Lederman MM: Role of human beta-defensins in HIV infection. Adv Dent Res 2006; 19:4248.
  • 24
    Doss M, White MR, Tecle T, Hartshorn KL: Human defensins and LL-37 in mucosal immunity. J Leukoc Biol 2010; 87:7992.
  • 25
    Zaiou M, Nizet V, Gallo RL: Antimicrobial and protease inhibitory functions of the human cathelicidin (hCAP18/LL-37) prosequence. J Invest Dermatol 2003; 120:810816.
  • 26
    Sorensen OE, Gram L, Johnsen AH, Andersson E, Bangsboll S, Tjabringa GS, Hiemstra PS, Malm J, Egesten A, Borregaard N: Processing of seminal plasma hCAP-18 to ALL-38 by gastricsin: a novel mechanism of generating antimicrobial peptides in vagina. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:2854028546.
  • 27
    Bingle CD, Vyakarnam A: Novel innate immune functions of the whey acidic protein family. Trends Immunol 2008; 29:444453.
  • 28
    Moreau T, Baranger K, Dadé S, Dallet-Choisy S, Guyot N, Zani M-L: Multifaceted roles of human elafin and secretory leukocyte proteinase inhibitor (SLPI), two serine protease inhibitors of the chelonianin family. Biochimie 2008; 90:284295.
  • 29
    Ghosh M, Shen Z, Fahey JV, Cu-Uvin S, Mayer K, Wira CR: Trappin-2/Elafin: a novel innate anti-human immunodeficiency virus-1 molecule of the human female reproductive tract. Immunology 2010; 129:207219.
  • 30
    Iqbal SM, Ball TB, Levinson P, Maranan L, Jaoko W, Wachihi C, Pak BJ, Podust VN, Broliden K, Hirbod T, Kaul R, Plummer FA: Elevated elafin/trappin-2 in the female genital tract is associated with protection against HIV acquisition. AIDS 2009; 23:16691677.
  • 31
    McNeely TB, Shugars DC, Rosendahl M, Tucker C, Eisenberg SP, Wahl SM: Inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectivity by secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor occurs prior to viral reverse transcription. Blood 1997; 90:11411149.
  • 32
    Ma G, Greenwell-Wild T, Lei K, Jin W, Swisher J, Hardegen N, Wild CT, Wahl SM: Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor binds to annexin II, a cofactor for macrophage HIV-1 infection. J Exp Med 2004; 200:13371346.
  • 33
    Ibrahim HR, Matsuzaki T, Aoki T: Genetic evidence that antibacterial activity of lysozyme is independent of its catalytic function. FEBS Lett 2001; 506:2732.
  • 34
    Lee-Huang S, Huang PL, Sun Y, Huang PL, Kung H-f, Blithe DL, Chen H-C: Lysozyme and RNases as anti-HIV components in beta-core preparations of human chorionic gonadotropin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:26782681.
  • 35
    Lee-Huang S, Maiorov V, Huang PL, Ng A, Lee HC, Chang YT, Kallenbach N, Chen HC: Structural and functional modeling of human lysozyme reveals a unique nonapeptide, HL9, with anti-HIV activity. Biochemistry 2005; 44:46484655.
  • 36
    Harmsen MC, Swart PJ, de Bethune MP, Pauwels R, De Clercq E, The TH, Meijer DK: Antiviral effects of plasma and milk proteins: lactoferrin shows potent activity against both human immunodeficiency virus and human cytomegalovirus replication in vitro. J Infect Dis 1995; 172:380388.
  • 37
    Yang D, Chen Q, Hoover DM, Staley P, Tucker KD, Lubkowski J, Oppenheim JJ: Many chemokines including CCL20/MIP-3alpha display antimicrobial activity. J Leukoc Biol 2003; 74:448455.
  • 38
    Ghosh M, Shen Z, Schaefer TM, Fahey JV, Gupta P, Wira CR: CCL20/MIP3α is a novel anti-HIV-1 molecule of the human female reproductive tract. Am J Reprod Immunol 2009; 62:6071.
  • 39
    Keller MJ, Guzman E, Hazrati E, Kasowitz A, Cheshenko N, Wallenstein S, Cole AL, Cole AM, Profy AT, Wira CR, Hogarty K, Herold BC: PRO 2000 elicits a decline in genital tract immune mediators without compromising intrinsic antimicrobial activity. AIDS 2007; 21:467476.
  • 40
    Horne AW, Stock SJ, King AE: Innate immunity and disorders of the female reproductive tract. Reproduction 2008; 135:739749.
  • 41
    Pommerville J: Infectious diseases affecting the reproductive and urinary systems. In Alcamo’s Fundamentals of Microbiology: Body Systems, JPommerville (ed.). Sudbury, MA, Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2010, pp 814815.
  • 42
    Valore EV, Park CH, Igreti SL, Ganz T: Antimicrobial components of vaginal fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187:561568.
  • 43
    Moriyama A, Shimoya K, Ogata I, Kimura T, Nakamura T, Wada H, Ohashi K, Azuma C, Saji F, Murata Y: Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) concentrations in cervical mucus of women with normal menstrual cycle. Mol Hum Reprod 1999; 5:656661.
  • 44
    King AE, Critchley HOD, Sallenave J-M, Kelly RW: Elafin in human endometrium: an antiprotease and antimicrobial molecule expressed during menstruation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88:44264431.
  • 45
    King AE, Critchley HOD, Kelly RW: Presence of secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor in human endometrium and first trimester decidua suggests an antibacterial protective role. Mol Hum Reprod 2000; 6:191196.
  • 46
    King AE, Wheelhouse N, Cameron S, McDonald SE, Lee KF, Entrican G, Critchley HO, Horne AW: Expression of secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor and elafin in human fallopian tube and in an in-vitro model of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Hum Reprod 2009; 24:679686.
  • 47
    Mosher WD, Jones J: Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008. Vital Health Stat 2010; 23:144.
  • 48
    Schumacher GFB: Soluble proteins in cervical mucus. In The Biology of the Cervix, RJBlandau, KMoghissi (eds). Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp 201233.
  • 49
    Shust GF, Cho S, Kim M, Madan RP, Guzman EM, Pollack M, Epstein J, Cohen HW, Keller MJ, Herold BC: Female genital tract secretions inhibit herpes simplex virus infection: correlation with soluble mucosal immune mediators and impact of hormonal contraception. Am J Reprod Immunol 2010; 63:110119.
  • 50
    Fleming DC, King AE, Williams AR, Critchley HO, Kelly RW: Hormonal contraception can suppress natural antimicrobial gene transcription in human endometrium. Fertil Steril 2003; 79:856863.
  • 51
    Mor G, Cardenas I: The immune system in pregnancy: a unique complexity. Am J Reprod Immunol 2010; 63:425433.
  • 52
    King AE, Paltoo A, Kelly RW, Sallenave JM, Bocking AD, Challis JR: Expression of natural antimicrobials by human placenta and fetal membranes. Placenta 2007; 28:161169.
  • 53
    Xu J, Holzman CB, Arvidson CG, Chung H, Goepfert AR: Midpregnancy vaginal fluid defensins, bacterial vaginosis, and risk of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112:524531.
  • 54
    Balu RB, Savitz DA, Ananth CV, Hartmann KE, Miller WC, Thorp JM, Heine RP: Bacterial vaginosis and vaginal fluid defensins during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187:12671271.
  • 55
    Simhan HN, Anderson BL, Krohn MA, Heine RP, Martinez de Tejada B, Landers DV, Hillier SL: Host immune consequences of asymptomatic Trichomonas vaginalis infection in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196:59.e159.e5.
  • 56
    King AE, Kelly RW, Sallenave JM, Bocking AD, Challis JR: Innate immune defences in the human uterus during pregnancy. Placenta 2007; 28:10991106.
  • 57
    Draper D, Donohoe W, Mortimer L, Heine RP: Cysteine proteases of Trichomonas vaginalis degrade secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor. J Infect Dis 1998; 178:815819.
  • 58
    Weldon S, McNally P, McElvaney NG, Elborn JS, McAuley DF, Wartelle J, Belaaouaj A, Levine RL, Taggart CC: Decreased levels of secretory leucoprotease inhibitor in the Pseudomonas-infected cystic fibrosis lung are due to neutrophil elastase degradation. J Immunol 2009; 183:81488156.
  • 59
    Novak RM, Donoval BA, Graham PJ, Boksa LA, Spear G, Hershow RC, Chen HY, Landay A: Cervicovaginal levels of lactoferrin, secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor, and RANTES and the effects of coexisting vaginoses in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seronegative women with a high risk of heterosexual acquisition of HIV infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2007; 14:11021107.
  • 60
    Sachdeva N, Oshima K, Cotter A, Ashman M, Davila L, Okazaki T, Inaba N, Asthana D: Analysis of immunological markers associated with pregnancy and HIV-1 infection: relevance in perinatal transmission in HIV-1-infected pregnant women with low plasma viral load. Am J Reprod Immunol 2008; 60:264273.
  • 61
    Stock SJ, Duthie L, Tremaine T, Calder AA, Kelly RW, Riley SC: Elafin (SKALP/Trappin-2/proteinase inhibitor-3) is produced by the cervix in pregnancy and cervicovaginal levels are diminished in bacterial vaginosis. Reprod Sci 2009; 16:11251134.
  • 62
    Gameiro C, Romao F: Changes in the immune system during menopause and aging. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 2010; 2:12991303.
  • 63
    Larbi A, Franceschi C, Mazzatti D, Solana R, Wikby A, Pawelec G: Aging of the immune system as a prognostic factor for human longevity. Physiology (Bethesda) 2008; 23:6474.
  • 64
    Ogra PL: Ageing and its possible impact on mucosal immune responses. Ageing Res Rev 2010; 9:101106.
  • 65
    Shaw AC, Joshi S, Greenwood H, Panda A, Lord JM: Aging of the innate immune system. Curr Opin Immunol 2010; 22:507513.
  • 66
    Leng J, Goldstein DR: Impact of aging on viral infections. Microbes Infect 2010; 12:11201124.
  • 67
    Taylor LD, Daniels CK, Schmucker DL: Ageing compromises gastrointestinal mucosal immune response in the rhesus monkey. Immunology 1992; 75:614618.
  • 68
    Summers PR: Unique skin immunology of the lower female genital tract with age. In Textbook of Aging Skin. MA Farage, KW Miller, HI Maibach (eds.). Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 2010, pp 255257.
  • 69
    Shaw JL, Petraki C, Watson C, Bocking A, Diamandis EP: Role of tissue kallikrein-related peptidases in cervical mucus remodeling and host defense. Biol Chem 2008; 389:15131522.
  • 70
    Goetzl EJ, Huang MC, Kon J, Patel K, Schwartz JB, Fast K, Ferrucci L, Madara K, Taub DD, Longo DL: Gender specificity of altered human immune cytokine profiles in aging. FASEB J 2010; 24:35803589.
  • 71
    Mselle TF, Meadows SK, Eriksson M, Smith JM, Shen L, Wira CR, Sentman CL: Unique characteristics of NK cells throughout the human female reproductive tract. Clin Immunol 2007; 124:6976.
  • 72
    Fahey JV, Wright JA, Shen L, Smith JM, Ghosh M, Rossoll RM, Wira CR: Estradiol selectively regulates innate immune function by polarized human uterine epithelial cells in culture. Mucosal Immunol 2008; 1:317325.
  • 73
    Han JH, Kim MS, Lee MY, Kim TH, Lee MK, Kim HR, Myung SC: Modulation of human β-defensin-2 expression by 17β-estradiol and progesterone in vaginal epithelial cells. Cytokine 2009; 49:209214.
  • 74
    Fahey JV, Wira CR: Effect of menstrual status on antibacterial activity and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor production by human uterine epithelial cells in culture. J Infect Dis 2002; 185:16061613.
  • 75
    Wahl S, McNeely T, Janoff E, Shugars D, Worley P, Tucker C, Orenstein J: Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) in mucosal fluids inhibits HIV-1. Oral Dis 1997; 3(Suppl. 1):S64S69.
  • 76
    Shimoya K, Zhang Q, Temma K, Kimura T, Tsujie T, Tsutsui T, Wasada K, Kanzaki T, Koyama M, Murata Y: Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor levels in cervicovaginal secretion of elderly women. Maturitas 2006; 54:141148.
  • 77
    Wira CR, Fahey JV, Ghosh M, Patel MV, Hickey DK, Ochiel DO: Sex hormone regulation of innate immunity in the female reproductive tract: the role of epithelial cells in balancing reproductive potential with protection against sexually transmitted pathogens. Am J Reprod Immunol 2010; 63:544565.
  • 78
    King AE, Fleming DC, Critchley HOD, Kelly RW: Differential expression of the natural antimicrobials, beta-defensins 3 and 4, in human endometrium. J Reprod Immunol 2003; 59:116.
  • 79
    Wira CR, Fahey JV, Sentman CL, Pioli PA, Shen L: Innate and adaptive immunity in female genital tract: cellular responses and interactions. Immunol Rev 2005; 206:306335.
  • 80
    Mselle TF, Howell AL, Ghosh M, Wira CR, Sentman CL: Human uterine natural killer cells but not blood natural killer cells inhibit human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection by secretion of CXCL12. J Virol 2009; 83:1118811195.
  • 81
    Smith JM, Wira CR, Fanger MW, Shen L: Human fallopian tube neutrophils – a distinct phenotype from blood neutrophils. Am J Reprod Immunol 2006; 56:218229.
  • 82
    Ghosh M, Fahey JV, Shen Z, Lahey T, Cu-Uvin S, Wu Z, Mayer K, Wright PF, Kappes JC, Ochsenbauer C, Wira CR: Anti-HIV activity in cervical-vaginal secretions from HIV-positive and -negative women correlate with innate antimicrobial levels and IgG antibodies. PLoS ONE 2010; 5:e11366.
  • 83
    Fahey J, Bodwell J, Hickey D, Ghosh M, Muia M, Wira CR: New approaches to making the microenvironment of the female reproductive tract hostile to HIV. Am J Reprod Immunol 2011; 65:334343.
  • 84
    Ghosh M, Fahey J, Wira C: Differential susceptability of HIV strains to innate immune factors in human cervical-vaginal secretions. Virus Adapt Treat 2010; 2010:6371.
  • 85
    Hazlett L, Wu M: Defensins in innate immunity. Cell Tissue Res 2011; 343:175188.
  • 86
    Mackewicz CE, Yuan J, Tran P, Diaz L, Mack E, Selsted ME, Levy JA: alpha-Defensins can have anti-HIV activity but are not CD8 cell anti-HIV factors. AIDS 2003; 17:F23F32.
  • 87
    Ellison 3rd RT, Giehl TJ: Killing of gram-negative bacteria by lactoferrin and lysozyme. J Clin Invest 1991; 88:10801091.
  • 88
    van Wetering S, van der Linden AC, van Sterkenburg MA, de Boer WI, Kuijpers AL, Schalkwijk J, Hiemstra PS: Regulation of SLPI and elafin release from bronchial epithelial cells by neutrophil defensins. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2000; 278:L51L58.
  • 89
    Shaw JL, Smith CR, Diamandis EP: Proteomic analysis of human cervico-vaginal fluid. J Proteome Res 2007; 6:28592865.
  • 90
    Monell CR, Strand M: Structural and functional similarities between synthetic HIV gp41 peptides and defensins. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1994; 71:315324.
  • 91
    White SH, Wimley WC, Selsted ME: Structure, function, and membrane integration of defensins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995; 5:521527.
  • 92
    Wira CR, Ghosh M, Smith JM, Shen L, Connor RI, Sundstrom P, Frechette GM, Hill EM, Fahey JV: Epithelial cell secretions from the human female reproductive tract inhibit sexually transmitted pathogens and Candida albicans but not Lactobacillus. Mucosal Immunol 2010. doi: 10.1038/mi.2010.72.
  • 93
    Venkataraman N, Cole AL, Svoboda P, Pohl J, Cole AM: Cationic polypeptides are required for anti-HIV-1 activity of human vaginal fluid. J Immunol 2005; 175:75607567.
  • 94
    Seidel A, Ye Y, de Armas LR, Soto M, Yarosh W, Marcsisin RA, Tran D, Selsted ME, Camerini D: Cyclic and acyclic defensins inhibit human immunodeficiency virus type-1 replication by different mechanisms. PLoS ONE 2010; 5:e9737.
  • 95
    Fakioglu E, Wilson SS, Mesquita PM, Hazrati E, Cheshenko N, Blaho JA, Herold BC: Herpes simplex virus downregulates secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor: a novel immune evasion mechanism. J Virol 2008; 82:93379344.
  • 96
    John M, Keller MJ, Fam EH, Cheshenko N, Hogarty K, Kasowitz A, Wallenstein S, Carlucci MJ, Tuyama AC, Lu W, Klotman ME, Lehrer RI, Herold BC: Cervicovaginal secretions contribute to innate resistance to herpes simplex virus infection. J Infect Dis 2005; 192:17311740.
  • 97
    Jenssen H, Sandvik K, Andersen JH, Hancock RE, Gutteberg TJ: Inhibition of HSV cell-to-cell spread by lactoferrin and lactoferricin. Antiviral Res 2008; 79:192198.
  • 98
    Hazrati E, Galen B, Lu W, Wang W, Ouyang Y, Keller MJ, Lehrer RI, Herold BC: Human alpha- and beta-defensins block multiple steps in herpes simplex virus infection. J Immunol 2006; 177:86588666.
  • 99
    Buck CB, Day PM, Thompson CD, Lubkowski J, Lu W, Lowy DR, Schiller JT: Human alpha-defensins block papillomavirus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:15161521.
  • 100
    Caberg JH, Hubert P, Herman L, Herfs M, Roncarati P, Boniver J, Delvenne P: Increased migration of Langerhans cells in response to HPV16 E6 and E7 oncogene silencing: role of CCL20. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2009; 58:3947.
  • 101
    Duffy CL, Phillips SL, Klingelhutz AJ: Microarray analysis identifies differentiation-associated genes regulated by human papillomavirus type 16 E6. Virology 2003; 314:196205.
  • 102
  • 103
    Kai-Larsen Y, Agerberth B: The role of the multifunctional peptide LL-37 in host defense. Front Biosci 2008; 13:37603767.
  • 104
    Brunham RC, Rey-Ladino J: Immunology of Chlamydia infection: implications for a Chlamydia trachomatis vaccine. Nat Rev Immunol 2005; 5:149161.
  • 105
  • 106
    Draper DL, Landers DV, Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Wiesenfeld HC, Heine RP: Levels of vaginal secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor are decreased in women with lower reproductive tract infections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183:12431248.
  • 107
    Wiechula B, Cholewa K, Ekiel A, Romanik M, Dolezych H, Martirosian G: HBD-1 and hBD-2 are expressed in cervico-vaginal lavage in female genital tract due to microbial infections. Ginekol Pol 2010; 81:268271.
  • 108
    Yasin B, Harwig SS, Lehrer RI, Wagar EA: Susceptibility of Chlamydia trachomatis to protegrins and defensins. Infect Immun 1996; 64:709713.
  • 109
    Cederlund A, Agerberth B, Bergman P: Specificity in killing pathogens is mediated by distinct repertoires of human neutrophil peptides. J Innate Immun 2010; 2:508521.
  • 110
    Cu-Uvin S, Hogan JW, Caliendo AM, Harwell J, Mayer KH, Carpenter CC: Association between bacterial vaginosis and expression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in the female genital tract. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33:894896.
  • 111
    Hillier SL: The complexity of microbial diversity in bacterial vaginosis. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:18861887.
  • 112
    Balkus J, Agnew K, Lawler R, Mitchell C, Hitti J: Effects of pregnancy and bacterial vaginosis on proinflammatory cytokine and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor concentrations in vaginal secretions. J Preg 2010 (online). doi: 10.1155/2010/385981.
  • 113
    Sommer U, Costello CE, Hayes GR, Beach DH, Gilbert RO, Lucas JJ, Singh BN: Identification of Trichomonas vaginalis cysteine proteases that induce apoptosis in human vaginal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:2385323860.
  • 114
    Magnus M, Clark R, Myers L, Farley T, Kissinger PJ: Trichomonas vaginalis among HIV-Infected women: are immune status or protease inhibitor use associated with subsequent T. vaginalis positivity? Sex Transm Dis 2003; 30:839843.
  • 115
    Sorvillo F, Smith L, Kerndt P, Ash L: Trichomonas vaginalis, HIV, and African-Americans. Emerg Infect Dis 2001; 7:927932.
  • 116
    Fichorova RN, Trifonova RT, Gilbert RO, Costello CE, Hayes GR, Lucas JJ, Singh BN: Trichomonas vaginalis lipophosphoglycan triggers a selective upregulation of cytokines by human female reproductive tract epithelial cells. Infect Immun 2006; 74:57735779.
  • 117
    Witkin SS, Linhares IM, Giraldo P: Bacterial flora of the female genital tract: function and immune regulation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 21:347354.
  • 118
    Ahmed N, Hayashi T, Hasegawa A, Furukawa H, Okamura N, Chida T, Masuda T, Kannagi M: Suppression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication in macrophages by commensal bacteria preferentially stimulating Toll-like receptor 4. J Gen Virol 2010; 91:28042813.
  • 119
    King AE, Critchley HO, Kelly RW: Innate immune defences in the human endometrium. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2003; 1:116.
  • 120
    Ochiel DO, Fahey JV, Ghosh M, Haddad SN, Wira CR: Innate immunity in the female reproductive tract: role of sex hormones in regulating uterine epithelial cell protection against pathogens. Curr Womens Health Rev 2008; 4:102117.
  • 121
    Murthy A, Lehrer R, Harwig S, Miyasaki K: In vitro candidastatic properties of the human neutrophil calprotectin complex. J Immunol 1993; 151:62916301.
  • 122
    Agerberth B, Charo J, Werr J, Olsson B, Idali F, Lindbom L, Kiessling R, Jornvall H, Wigzell H, Gudmundsson GH: The human antimicrobial and chemotactic peptides LL-37 and alpha-defensins are expressed by specific lymphocyte and monocyte populations. Blood 2000; 96:30863093.
  • 123
    Ganz T, Selsted ME, Szklarek D, Harwig SS, Daher K, Bainton DF, Lehrer RI: Defensins. Natural peptide antibiotics of human neutrophils. J Clin Invest 1985; 76:14271435.
  • 124
    Levinson P, Kaul R, Kimani J, Ngugi E, Moses S, MacDonald KS, Broliden K, Hirbod T; Kibera HIV Study Group: Levels of innate immune factors in genital fluids: association of alpha defensins and LL-37 with genital infections and increased HIV acquisition. AIDS 2009; 23:309317.
  • 125
    Hein M, Valore EV, Helmig RB, Uldbjerg N, Ganz T: Antimicrobial factors in the cervical mucus plug. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187:137144.
  • 126
    Duits LA, Ravensbergen B, Rademaker M, Hiemstra PS, Nibbering PH: Expression of beta-defensin 1 and 2 mRNA by human monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells. Immunology 2002; 106:517525.
  • 127
    Han JH, Kim MS, Lee MY, Kim TH, Lee M-K, Kim HR, Myung SC: Modulation of human [beta]-defensin-2 expression by 17[beta]-estradiol and progesterone in vaginal epithelial cells. Cytokine 2010; 49:209214.
  • 128
    Cremel M, Berlier W, Hamzeh H, Cognasse F, Lawrence P, Genin C, Bernengo JC, Lambert C, Dieu-Nosjean MC, Delezay O: Characterization of CCL20 secretion by human epithelial vaginal cells: involvement in Langerhans cell precursor attraction. J Leukoc Biol 2005; 78:158166.
  • 129
    Pfundt R, van Ruissen F, van Vlijmen-Willems IM, Alkemade HA, Zeeuwen PL, Jap PH, Dijkman H, Fransen J, Croes H, van Erp PE, Schalkwijk J: Constitutive and inducible expression of SKALP/elafin provides anti-elastase defense in human epithelia. J Clin Investig 1996; 98:13891399.
  • 130
    Narvekar N, Lakha F, Critchley HO, Glasier AF, Williams AR, Leminen R, Heikinheimo O, Kelly RW, Baird DT: Changes in vaginal morphology, steroid receptor and natural antimicrobial content following treatment with low-dose mifepristone. Contraception 2007; 75:271280.
  • 131
    Pillay K, Coutsoudis A, Agadzi-Naqvi AK, Kuhn L, Coovadia HM, Janoff EN: Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor in vaginal fluids and perinatal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission. J Infect Dis 2001; 183:653656.
  • 132
    Casslen B, Rosengren M, Ohlsson K: Localization and quantitation of a low molecular weight proteinase inhibitor, antileukoprotease, in the human uterus. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem 1981; 362:953961.
  • 133
    Frohm Nilsson M, Sandstedt B, Sorensen O, Weber G, Borregaard N, Stahle-Backdahl M: The human cationic antimicrobial protein (hCAP18), a peptide antibiotic, is widely expressed in human squamous epithelia and colocalizes with interleukin-6. Infect Immun 1999; 67:25612566.
  • 134
    Cowland JB, Johnsen AH, Borregaard N: hCAP-18, a cathelin/pro-bactenecin-like protein of human neutrophil specific granules. FEBS Lett 1995; 368:173176.
  • 135
    Abtin A, Eckhart L, Glaser R, Gmeiner R, Mildner M, Tschachler E: The antimicrobial heterodimer S100A8/S100A9 (calprotectin) is upregulated by bacterial flagellin in human epidermal keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 2010; 130:24232430.
  • 136
    Kido J, Hayashi N, Kataoka M, Nagata T: Calprotectin expression in human monocytes: induction by porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interleukin-1beta. J Periodontol 2005; 76:437442.
  • 137
    Ming L, Xiaoling P, Yan L, Lili W, Qi W, Xiyong Y, Boyao W, Ning H: Purification of antimicrobial factors from human cervical mucus. Hum Reprod 2007; 22:18101815.
  • 138
    Eggert-Kruse W, Botz I, Pohl S, Rohr G, Strowitzki T: Antimicrobial activity of human cervical mucus. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:778784.
  • 139
    Lollike K, Kjeldsen L, Sengelov H, Borregaard N: Lysozyme in human neutrophils and plasma. A parameter of myelopoietic activity. Leukemia 1995; 9:159164.
  • 140
    Cohen MS, Britigan BE, French M, Bean K: Preliminary observations on lactoferrin secretion in human vaginal mucus: variation during the menstrual cycle, evidence of hormonal regulation, and implications for infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157:11221125.
  • 141
    Oberley RE, Goss KL, Ault KA, Crouch EC, Snyder JM: Surfactant protein D is present in the human female reproductive tract and inhibits Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Mol Hum Reprod 2004; 10:861870.
  • 142
    Oberley RE, Goss KL, Dahmoush L, Ault KA, Crouch EC, Snyder JM: A role for surfactant protein D in innate immunity of the human prostate. Prostate 2005; 65:241251.
  • 143
    Oberley RE, Goss KL, Hoffmann DS, Ault KA, Neff TL, Ramsey KH, Snyder JM: Regulation of surfactant protein D in the mouse female reproductive tract in vivo. Mol Hum Reprod 2007; 13:863868.
  • 144
    Garcia-Verdugo I, Tanfin Z, Breuiller-Fouche M: Surfactant protein A: an immunoregulatory molecule involved in female reproductive biology. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2010; 42:17791783.
  • 145
    Madsen J, Tornoe I, Nielsen O, Koch C, Steinhilber W, Holmskov U: Expression and localization of lung surfactant protein A in human tissues. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2003; 29:591597.
  • 146
    MacNeill C, Umstead TM, Phelps DS, Lin Z, Floros J, Shearer DA, Weisz J: Surfactant protein A, an innate immune factor, is expressed in the vaginal mucosa and is present in vaginal lavage fluid. Immunology 2004; 111:9199.
  • 147
    Crombie R, Silverstein RL, MacLow C, Pearce SF, Nachman RL, Laurence J: Identification of a CD36-related thrombospondin 1-binding domain in HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp120: relationship to HIV-1-specific inhibitory factors in human saliva. J Exp Med 1998; 187:2535.
  • 148
    Wu MP, Tzeng CC, Wu LW, Huang KF, Chou CY: Thrombospondin-1 acts as a fence to inhibit angiogenesis that occurs during cervical carcinogenesis. Cancer J 2004; 10:2732.
  • 149
    Moutsopoulos NM, Greenwell-Wild T, Wahl SM: Differential mucosal susceptibility in HIV-1 transmission and infection. Adv Dent Res 2006; 19:5256.
  • 150
    Wang Z, Widgren EE, Sivashanmugam P, O’Rand MG, Richardson RT: Association of eppin with semenogelin on human spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 2005; 72:10641070.
  • 151
    Yenugu S, Richardson RT, Sivashanmugam P, Wang Z, O’Rand MG, French FS, Hall SH: Antimicrobial activity of human EPPIN, an androgen-regulated, sperm-bound protein with a whey acidic protein motif. Biol Reprod 2004; 71:14841490.
  • 152
    Zhao C, Nguyen T, Yusifov T, Glasgow BJ, Lehrer RI: Lipophilins: human peptides homologous to rat prostatein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999; 256:147155.
  • 153
    Seppala M, Taylor RN, Koistinen H, Koistinen R, Milgrom E: Glycodelin: a major lipocalin protein of the reproductive axis with diverse actions in cell recognition and differentiation. Endocr Rev 2002; 23:401430.
  • 154
    Fluckinger M, Haas H, Merschak P, Glasgow BJ, Redl B: Human tear lipocalin exhibits antimicrobial activity by scavenging microbial siderophores. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48:33673372.
  • 155
    Halttunen M, Kamarainen M, Koistinen H: Glycodelin: a reproduction-related lipocalin. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000; 1482:149156.
  • 156
    Jacobsen F, Baraniskin A, Mertens J, Mittler D, Mohammadi-Tabrisi A, Schubert S, Soltau M, Lehnhardt M, Behnke B, Gatermann S, Steinau HU, Steinstraesser L: Activity of histone H1.2 in infected burn wounds. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 55:735741.
  • 157
    Kawasaki H, Iwamuro S: Potential roles of histones in host defense as antimicrobial agents. Infect Disord Drug Targets 2008; 8:195205.
  • 158
    Tollin M, Bergman P, Svenberg T, Jornvall H, Gudmundsson GH, Agerberth B: Antimicrobial peptides in the first line defence of human colon mucosa. Peptides 2003; 24:523530.
  • 159
    Denison F, Kelly R, Calder A, Riley S: Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor concentration increases in amniotic fluid with the onset of labour in women: characterization of sites of release within the uterus. J Endocrinol 1999; 161:299306.