• 1
    Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1994; 272: 158162.
  • 2
    Timmer A, Hilsden RJ, Cole J, Hailey D, Sutherland LR. Publication bias in gastroenterological research – a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. BMC Med Res Methodol 2002; 2: 110.
  • 3
    De Bellefeuille C, Morrison CA, Tannock IF. The fate of abstracts submitted to a cancer meeting: factors which influence presentation and subsequent publication. Ann Oncol 1992; 3: 187191.
  • 4
    Weber EJ, Callaham ML, Wears RL, Barton C, Young G. Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting. JAMA 1998; 280: 257259.
  • 5
    Sprague S, Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ et al. Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopedic meetings. J Bone Joint Surg 2003; 85: 158163.
  • 6
    Callaham ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C, Young G. Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. JAMA 1998; 280: 254257.
  • 7
    Carrol AE, Sox CM, Tarini BA, Ringold S, Chirstakas DA. Does presentation format at the Pediatric Academic Societies’ annual meeting predict subsequent publication. Pediatrics 2003; 112: 12381241.
  • 8
    Dickersin K, Min YI, Meinert CL. Factoring influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institution review boards. JAMA 1992; 267: 374378.
  • 9
    Krzyzanowska MK, Pintilie M, Tannock IF. Factors associated with failure to publish large randomized trials presented at an oncology meeting. JAMA 2003; 290: 495501.
  • 10
    Ioannidis JP. Effect of the statistical significant of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trials. JAMA 1998; 279: 281286.
  • 11
    Scientific Program of Abstracts, Supplement to Transplantation (Volume 69 (8) April 27, 2000). Original presentation of abstracts at ‘Transplant 2000’, the 1st Joint Annual Meeting of ASTS and AST held May, 2000, in Chicago, sponsored by AST (American Society of Transplantation).
  • 12
    Hennekens CH, Burnings JE. Epidemiology in Medicine. 1st Edn. USA : Little Brown & Company. 1997.
  • 13
    Allsion PD. Missing Data. Thousand Oaks , California : Sage Publications. 2001: 1104.
  • 14
    Gilbert WM, Pitkin RM. Society for maternal-fetal medicine meeting presentations: what gets published and why? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 3235.
  • 15
    Juzych MS, Shin DH, Coffey J, Juzych L, Shin D. Whatever happened to abstracts from different sections of the association of research in vision and ophthalmology? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34: 18791882.
  • 16
    Barnes DE, Bero LA. Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA 1998; 279: 15661570.
  • 17
    Koren G, Graham K, Shear H, Einarson T. Bias against the null hypothesis: the reproductive hazards of cocaine. Lancet 1989; 2: 14401442.
  • 18
    Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ 2003; 326: 11671170.
  • 19
    Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflict of interesting biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA 2003; 289: 454465.
  • 20
    Eloubeidi MA, Wade BS, Provenzal B. Factors associated with acceptance and full publication of GI endoscopic research originally published in abstract form. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 275282.
  • 21
    Timmer A, Blum T, Lankisch PG. Publication rates following pancreas meetings. Pancreas 2001; 23: 212215.
  • 22
    Hopewell S, Clarke M, Lusher A, Lefebvre C, Westby M. A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials, (abstract). Stat Med 2002; 2: 16251634.