SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    U.S. Renal Data System, USRDS 2004 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. Bethesda , MD : National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2004.
  • 2
    US Transplant—Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. 2004 OPTN/SRTR Annual Report. Ann Arbor , MI : University Renal Research and Education Association with the University of Michigan, 2004.
  • 3
    Braun WE. Every kidney counts. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 883885.
  • 4
    Roberts JP, Wolfe RA, Bragg-Gresham JL et al. Effect of changing the priority for HLA matching on the rates and outcomes of kidney transplantation in minority groups. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 545551.
  • 5
    Meier-Kriesche HU, Schold JD, Gaston RS, Wadstrom J, Kaplan B. Kidneys from deceased donors: Maximizing the value of a scarce resource. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 17251730.
  • 6
    Matas AJ. The case for living kidney sales: Rationale, objections and concerns. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 20072017.
  • 7
    Ross WD. The Right and the Good. New York : Oxford University Press; 2002 rpt. of original 1930 edition.
  • 8
    Leffell MS, Zachary AA. The national impact of the 1995 changes to the UNOS renal allocation system. United Network for Organ Sharing. Clin Transplant 1999; 13: 287295.
  • 9
    Ting A, Edwards LB. Human leukocyte antigen in the allocation of kidneys from cadaveric donors in the United States. Transplantation 2004; 77: 610614.
  • 10
    Palmore EB. Ageism in Canada and the United States. J Cross Cult Gerontol 2004; 19: 4146.
  • 11
    Danovitch GM, Cohen B, Smits JM et al. Waiting time or wasted time? The case for using time on dialysis to determine waiting time in the allocation of cadaveric kidneys. Am J Transplant 2002; 2: 891893.
  • 12
    Gritsch HA, Smith CV, Rajfer J et al. Kidney transplantation at UCLA. Clin Transpl 2002:137142.
  • 13
    Fritsche L, Hörstrup J, Budde K et al. Old-for-old kidney allocation allows successful expansion of the donor and recipient pool. Am J Transplant 2003; 3: 14341439.
  • 14
    Kasiske BL, Snyder J. Matching older kidneys with older patients does not improve allograft survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 10671072.
  • 15
    Modlin CS, Goldfarb DA, Novick AC. The use of expanded criteria cadaver and live donor kidneys for transplantation. Urol Clin North Am 2001; 28: 687707.
  • 16
    Meier-Kriesche HU, Cibrik DM, Ojo AO et al. Interaction between donor and recipient age in determining the risk of chronic renal allograft failure. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 1417.
  • 17
    Callender CO, Miles PV. Institutionalized racism and end-stage renal disease: Is its impact real or illusionary? Semin Dial 2004; 17: 177180.
  • 18
    Keith DS, Demattos A, Golconda M, Prather J, Norman D. Effect of donor recipient age match on survival after first deceased donor renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15: 10861091.
  • 19
    Geddes CC, Rodger RS, Smith C, Ganai A. Allocation of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation: Opinions of patients with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2005; 46: 949956.