• 1
    Port FK. Organ donation and transplantation trends in the United States, 2001. Am J Transplant 2003; 3: 712.
  • 2
    UNOS Policy 3.5.1. Definition of Expanded Criteria Donor and Standard Donor., 2002.
  • 3
    Metzger RA, Delmonico FL, Feng S, Port FK, Wynne JJ, Merion RM. Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2003; 3: 114125.
  • 4
    Johnston TD, Thacker LR, Jeon H, Lucas BA, Ranjan D. Sensitivity of expanded-criteria donor kidneys to cold ischaemia time. Clin Transplant 2004; 18: 2832.
  • 5
    Stratta RJ, Rohr MS, Sundberg AK et al. Increased kidney transplantation utilizing expanded criteria deceased organ donors with results comparable to standard criteria donor transplant. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 688695.
  • 6
    Polyak MMR, Arrington BO, Stubenbord WT, Kapur S, Kinkhabwala M. Prostaglandin E-1 influences pulsatile preservation characteristics and early graft function in expanded criteria donor kidneys. J Surg Res 1999; 85: 1725.
  • 7
    Polyak MMR, Arrington BO, Stubenbord WT et al. The influence of pulsatile preservation on renal transplantation in the 1990s. Transplantation 2000; 69: 249258.
  • 8
    Burdick J, Rosendale JD, McBride M, Kauffman H, Bennett LE. National impact of pulsatile perfusion on cadaveric kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1997; 64: 17301733.
  • 9
    Alijani MR, Cutler JA, Delvalle CJ et al. Single-donor cold-storage versus machine perfusion in cadaver kidney-preservation. Transplantation 1985; 40: 659661.
  • 10
    Mozes MF, Finch WT, Reckard CR, Merkel FK, Cohen C. Comparison of cold-storage and machine perfusion in the preservation of cadaver kidneys—A prospective, randomized study. Transplant Proc 1985; 17: 14741477.
  • 11
    Halloran P, Aprile M. A randomized prospective trial of cold-storage versus pulsatile perfusion for cadaver kidney-preservation. Transplantation 1987; 43: 827832.
  • 12
    Mendez R, Mendez RG, Koussa N, Cats S, Bogaard TP, Khetan U. Preservation effect on oligo-anuria in the cyclosporine era—A prospective trial with 26 paired cadaveric renal-allografts. Transplant Proc 1987; 19: 20472050.
  • 13
    Merion RM, Oh HK, Port FK, Toledopereyra LH, Turcotte JG. A prospective controlled trial of cold-storage versus machine-perfusion preservation in cadaveric renal-transplantation. Transplantation 1990; 50: 230233.
  • 14
    Polyak MMR, Arrington BO, Kapur S, Stubenbord WT, Kinkhabwala M. Glutathione supplementation during cold ischemia does not confer early functional advantage in renal transplantation. Transplantation 2000; 70: 202205.
  • 15
    Sellers MT, Gallichio MH, Hudson SL et al. Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile preservation. Clin Transplant 2000; 14: 543549.
  • 16
    Schold JD, Kaplan B, Howard RJ, Reed AI, Foley DP, Meier-Kriesche HU. Are we frozen in time? Analysis of the utilization and efficacy of pulsatile perfusion in renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 16811688.
  • 17
    Wight JP, Chilcott JB, Holmes MW, Brewer N. Pulsatile machine perfusion vs. cold storage of kidneys for transplantation: A rapid and systematic review. Clin Transplant 2003; 17: 293307.
  • 18
    Brier ME, Ray PC, Klein JB. Prediction of delayed renal allograft function using an artificial neural network. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18: 26552659.
  • 19
    Hetzel GR, Klein B, Brause M et al. Risk factors for delayed graft function after renal transplantation and their significance for long-term clinical outcome. Transpl Int 2002; 15: 1016.
  • 20
    Humar A, Ramcharan T, Kandaswamy R, Gillingham K, Payne WD, Matas AJ. Risk factors for slow graft function after kidney transplants: A multivariate analysis. Clin Transplant 2002; 16: 425429.
  • 21
    Perico N, Cattaneo D, Sayegh MH, Remuzzi G. Delayed graft function in kidney transplantation. Lancet 2004; 364: 18141827.
  • 22
    Rosenthal JT, Danovitch GM, Wilkinson A, Ettenger RB. The high cost of delayed graft function in cadaveric renal-transplantation. Transplantation 1991; 51: 11151118.
  • 23
    Shoskes D, Cecka J. Deleterious effects of delayed graft function in cadaveric renal transplant recipients independent of acute rejection. Transplantation 1998; 66: 16971701.
  • 24
    Grundmann R, Strumper R, Eichmann J, Pichlmaier H. Immediate function of kidney after 24-hr to 72-hr preservation—Hypothermic storage versus mechanical perfusion. Transplantation 1977; 23: 437443.
  • 25
    Gregg CM, Cos LR, Saraf P, Fridd CW, Linke CA. Recovery of glomerular and tubular function in autotransplanted dog kidneys preserved by hypothermic storage or machine perfusion—Relation of initial function to long-term function. Transplantation 1986; 42: 453458.
  • 26
    Baron P, Heil J, Condie R, Burke B, Najarian JS, Sutherland DER. 96-hour renal preservation with silica-gel precipitated plasma cold-storage versus pulsatile perfusion. Transplant Proc 1990; 22: 464465.
  • 27
    Small A, Feduska NJ, Leapman SB. Function of autotransplanted kidneys after 24-hour preservation by hypothermic pulsatile perfusion or simple cold storage. Transplantation 1978; 26: 228232.
  • 28
    Nicholson ML, Hosgood SA, Metcalfe MS, Waller JR, Brook NR. A comparison of renal preservation by cold storage and machine perfusion using a porcine autotransplant model. Transplantation 2004; 78: 333337.
  • 29
    Denham BS, Linke CA, Fridd CW. 24 hour canine renal preservation by pulsatile perfusion, hypothermic storage, and combinations of 2 methods. Transplant Proc 1977; 9: 15531556.
  • 30
    Halasz NA, Collins GM. 48-hour kidney-preservation—Comparison of flushing and ice storage with perfusion. Arch Surg 1976; 111: 175177.
  • 31
    Sonnenday CJ, Cooper M, Kraus E, Gage F, Handley C, Montgomery RA. The hazards of basing acceptance of cadaveric renal allografts on pulsatile perfusion parameters alone. Transplantation 2003; 75: 20292033.