SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Morath C, Ritz E, Zeier M. Protocol biopsy: What is the rationale and what is the evidence? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18: 644647.
  • 2
    Nankivell BJ, Fenton-Lee CA, Kuypers DR et al. Effect of histological damage on long-term kidney transplant outcome. Transplantation 2001; 71: 515523.
  • 3
    Fereira LC, Karras A, Martinez F et al. Complications of protocol renal biopsy. Transplantation 2004; 77: 14751476.
  • 4
    Hergesell O, Felten H, Andrassy K et al. Safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy-retrospective analysis of 1090 consecutive cases. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13: 975977.
  • 5
    Rush D, Nickerson P, Gough J et al. Beneficial effects of treatment of early subclinical rejection: A randomized study. J Am Soc Nephrol 1998; 9: 21292134.
  • 6
    Jain S, Curwood V, Kazi J et al. Acute rejection in protocol renal transplant biopsies-institutional variations. Transplant Proc 2000; 32: 616.
  • 7
    Jain S, Curwood V, White SA et al. Sub-clinical acute rejection detected using protocol biopsies in patients with delayed graft function. Transpl Int 2000; 13(Suppl. 1): S5255.
  • 8
    Roberts IS, Reddy S, Russell C et al. Subclinical rejection and borderline changes in early protocol biopsy specimens after renal transplantation. Transplantation 2004; 77: 11941198.
  • 9
    Masin-Spasovska J, Spasovski G, Dzikova S et al. The evolution of untreated borderline and subclinical rejections at first month kidney allograft biopsy in comparison with histological changes at 6 months protocol biopsies. Prilozi 2005; 26: 2533.
  • 10
    Nankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CL et al. Natural history, risk factors, and impact of subclinical rejection in kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2004; 78: 242249.
  • 11
    Rush DN, Jeffery JR, Gough J. Sequential protocol biopsies in renal transplant patients. Clinico-pathological correlations using the Banff schema. Transplantation 1995; 59: 511514.
  • 12
    Shapiro R, Randhawa P, Jordan ML et al. An analysis of early renal transplant protocol biopsies—the high incidence of subclinical tubulitis. Am J Transplant 2001; 1: 4750.
  • 13
    Shishido S, Asanuma H, Nakai H et al. The impact of repeated subclinical acute rejection on the progression of chronic allograft nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 10461052.
  • 14
    Choi BS, Shin MJ, Shin SJ et al. Clinical significance of an early protocol biopsy in living-donor renal transplantation: Ten-year experience at a single center. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 13541360.
  • 15
    Masin-Spasovska J, Spasovski G, Polenakovic M et al. Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in early renal protocol biopsies: Does treatment of borderline and subclinical acute rejections prevent development and progression of CAN? Prilozi 2005; 26: 91103.
  • 16
    Rush DN, Henry SF, Jeffery JR et al. Histological findings in early routine biopsies of stable renal allograft recipients. Transplantation 1994; 57: 208211.
  • 17
    Nankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CL et al. The natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 23262333.
  • 18
    Kuypers DR, Chapman JR, O'Connell PJ et al. Predictors of renal transplant histology at three months. Transplantation 1999; 67: 12221230.
  • 19
    Nankivell BJ, Chapman JR. The significance of subclinical rejection and the value of protocol biopsies. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 20062012.
  • 20
    Gloor JM, Cohen AJ, Lager DJ et al. Subclinical rejection in tacrolimus-treated renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 2002; 73: 19651968.
  • 21
    Sakai K, Miyagi Y, Hasegawa T et al. The pathologic impact of tacrolimus on protocol biopsy in renal transplant patients with basiliximab-based immunosuppression. Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 17571759.
  • 22
    Moreso F, Alperovich G, Fulladosa X et al. Histologic findings in protocol biopsies performed in stable renal allografts under different immunosuppressive schedules. Transplant Proc 2003; 35: 16661668.
  • 23
    Toz H, Sen S, Sezis M et al. Comparison of tacrolimus and cyclosporin in renal transplantation by the protocol biopsies. Transplant Proc 2004; 36: 134136.
  • 24
    Seron D, O'Valle F, Moreso F et al. Immunophenotype of infiltrating cells in protocol renal allograft biopsies from tacrolimus-versus cyclosporine-treated patients. Transplantation 2007; 83: 649652.
  • 25
    Kee TY, Chapman JR, O'Connell PJ et al. Treatment of subclinical rejection diagnosed by protocol biopsy of kidney transplants. Transplantation 2006; 82: 3642.
  • 26
    Legendre C, Thervet E, Skhiri H et al. Histologic features of chronic allograft nephropathy revealed by protocol biopsies in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation 1998; 65: 15061509.
  • 27
    Seron D. Early diagnosis of chronic allograft nephropathy by means of protocol biopsies. Transplant Proc 2004; 36: 763764.
  • 28
    Seron D, Moreso F, Ramon JM et al. Protocol renal allograft biopsies and the design of clinical trials aimed to prevent or treat chronic allograft nephropathy. Transplantation 2000; 69: 18491855.
  • 29
    Krieger NR, Becker BN, Heisey DM et al. Chronic allograft nephropathy uniformly affects recipients of cadaveric, nonidentical living-related, and living-unrelated grafts. Transplantation 2003; 75: 16771682.
  • 30
    Masin-Spasovska J, Spasovski G, Dzikova S et al. Protocol biopsies in kidney transplant recipients: Histologic findings as prognostic markers for graft function and outcome. Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 705708.
  • 31
    Ortiz F, Paavonen T, Tornroth T et al. Predictors of renal allograft histologic damage progression. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16: 817824.
  • 32
    Solez K, Axelsen RA, Benediktsson H et al. International standardization of criteria for the histologic diagnosis of renal allograft rejection: The Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Kidney Int 1993; 44: 411422.
  • 33
    Solez K, Racusen LC, Marcussen N et al. Morphology of ischemic acute renal failure, normal function, and cyclosporine toxicity in cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients. Kidney Int 1993; 43: 10581067.
  • 34
    Seron D, Moreso F, Bover J et al. Early protocol renal allograft biopsies and graft outcome. Kidney Int 1997; 51: 310316.
  • 35
    Seikku P, Krogerus L, Jalanko H, Holmberg C. Better renal function with enhanced immunosuppression and protocol biopsies after kidney transplantation in children. Pediatr Transplant 2005; 9: 754762.
  • 36
    Namba Y, Moriyama T, Kyo M et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and outcome of BK virus nephropathy in Japanese renal transplant patients: Analysis in protocol and episode biopsies. Clin Transplant 2005; 19: 97101.
  • 37
    Sachdeva MS, Nada R, Jha V et al. The high incidence of BK polyoma virus infection among renal transplant recipients in India. Transplantation 2004; 77: 429431.