• 1
    Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. 2005 Annual Report, Table 5.4. Available from:, Accessed December 15, 2006.
  • 2
    Ojo AO, Hanson JA, Meier-Kriesche H et al. Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 589597.
  • 3
    Port FK, Bragg JL, Metzger RA et al. Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: An approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation 2002; 74:12811286.
  • 4
    Rosengard BR, Feng S, Alfrey EJ et al. Report of the Crystal City meeting to maximize the use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor. Am J Transplant 2002; 2: 701711.
  • 5
    Sung RS, Guidinger MK, Lake C et al. Impact of the expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidney allocation system on the utilization of ECD kidneys. Transplantation 2005; 79: 12571261.
  • 6
    Lee CM, Scandling JD, Pavlakis M, Markezich AJ, Dafoe DC, Alfrey EJ. A review of kidneys that nobody wanted: Determinants of optimal outcome. Transplantation 1998; 65: 213219.
  • 7
    Schnitzler MA, Whiting JF, Brennan DC et al. The expanded criteria donor dilemma in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 2003; 75: 19401945.
  • 8
    Doshi MD, Hunsicker LG. Short- and long-term outcomes with the use of kidneys and livers donated after cardiac death. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 121129.
  • 9
    Edwards EB, Posner MP, Maluf DG, Kauffman HM. Reasons for non-use of recovered kidneys: The effect of donor glomerulosclerosis and creatinine clearance on graft survival. Transplantation 2004; 77: 14111415.
  • 10
    Cecka JM, Cohen B, Rosendale J, Smith M. Could more effective use of kidneys recovered from older deceased donors result in more kidney transplants for older patients? Transplantation 2006; 81: 966970.
  • 11
    Remuzzi G, Cravedi P, Perna A et al. Long-term outcome of renal transplantation from older donors. N Eng J Med 2006; 354: 343352.
  • 12
    Randhawa PS, Minervini MI, Lombardero M et al. Biopsy of marginal donor kidneys: Correlation of histologic findings with graft dysfunction. Transplantation 2000; 69: 13521357.
  • 13
    Pokorna E, Vitko S, Chadimova M, Schuck O, Ekberg H. Proportion of glomerulosclerosis in procurement wedge renal biopsy cannot alone discriminate for acceptance of marginal donors. Transplantation 2000; 69: 3643.
  • 14
    Lipkowitz GS, Leichtman AB, Christensen LL et al. Procurement, utilization and initial outcome in a prospective ECD study. Am J Transplant 2005; 5S11 (abstract): 350.
  • 15
    Sellers MT, Gallichio MH, Hudson SL et al. Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile preservation. Clin Transplant 2000; 14: 543549.
  • 16
    Wight JP, Chilcott JB, Holmes MW, Brewer N. Pulsatile machine perfusion vs. cold storage of kidneys for transplantation: A rapid and systematic review. Clin Transplant 2003; 17: 293307.
  • 17
    Polyak MM, Arrington BO, Stubenbord WT et al. The influence of pulsatile preservation on renal transplantation in the 1990s. Transplantation 2000; 69: 249258.
  • 18
    Matsuoka L, Shah T, Aswad S et al. Pulsatile perfusion reduces the incidence of delayed graft function in expanded criteria donor kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 14731478.
  • 19
    Guarrara JV, Polyak MM, Arrington B et al. Pushing the envelope in renal preservation: Improved results with novel perfusate modifications for pulsatile machine perfusion of cadaver kidneys. Transplant Proc 2004; 36: 12571260.