Present address: Department of Neurosciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Taok2 controls behavioral response to ethanol in mice
Article first published online: 31 AUG 2012
© 2012 The Authors. Genes, Brain and Behavior © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society
Genes, Brain and Behavior
Volume 12, Issue 1, pages 87–97, February 2013
How to Cite
Kapfhamer, D., Taylor, S., Zou, M. E., Lim, J. P., Kharazia, V. and Heberlein, U. (2013), Taok2 controls behavioral response to ethanol in mice. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 12: 87–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2012.00834.x
- Issue published online: 23 JAN 2013
- Article first published online: 31 AUG 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 9 AUG 2012 12:20PM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 2 AUG 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 1 AUG 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 26 JUN 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 30 MAY 2012
- Manuscript Received: 15 MAR 2012
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
- National Institutes of Health
- State of California
- Conditioned place preference;
- ethanol consumption;
- ethanol sensitivity;
- MAP kinase;
Despite recent advances in the understanding of ethanol's biological action, many of the molecular targets of ethanol and mechanisms behind ethanol's effect on behavior remain poorly understood. In an effort to identify novel genes, the products of which regulate behavioral responses to ethanol, we recently identified a mutation in the dtao gene that confers resistance to the locomotor stimulating effect of ethanol in Drosophila. dtao encodes a member of the Ste20 family of serine/threonine kinases implicated in MAP kinase signaling pathways. In this study, we report that conditional ablation of the mouse dtao homolog, Taok2, constitutively and specifically in the nervous system, results in strain-specific and overlapping alterations in ethanol-dependent behaviors. These data suggest a functional conservation of dtao and Taok2 in mediating ethanol's biological action and identify Taok2 as a putative candidate gene for ethanol use disorders in humans.
An estimated 12.5% of the US population suffers from alcohol dependence (Hasin et al. 2007), exacting immense individual and societal costs. Despite the high prevalence of alcohol use disorders, the biological effects of ethanol remain poorly understood. In contrast to many drugs of abuse, ethanol acts on multiple biological targets, including neurotransmitter systems, cellular membrane components and intracellular signaling pathways (Buck & Harris 1991; Chandler 2003; Harris & Hitzemann 1981; Moonat et al. 2010; Newton & Messing 2006).
Emerging evidence suggests that mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascades may play an important role in the action of ethanol and other drugs of abuse (Arror & Shukla 2004; Corominas et al. 2007; Hebert & O'Callaghan 2000). MAPK signaling transduces such diverse extracellular stimuli as growth factors, cytokines and environmental stressors via a three-tiered intracellular signaling pathway to induce changes in gene transcription, cellular morphology, differentiation, proliferation and death (Krishna & Narang 2008; Seger & Krebs 1995). Specifically, MAP kinase kinase kinases (MAP3Ks) phosphorylate and activate MAP2Ks, which in turn phosphorylate and activate three classes of MAP kinases: p38, ERK and c-JUN NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) (Davis 1994; Sugden & Clerk 1997; Takeda & Ichijo 2002). Meta-analysis of expression studies has revealed that brain transcript levels of various MAPK signaling components are altered in response to ethanol, cocaine and other drugs of abuse (Daniels & Buck 2002; Freeman et al. 2010; Hassan et al. 2003; Konu et al. 2001). Furthermore, ethanol treatment increases phosphorylation and activation of p38, ERK and JNK in both liver and brain (Arror & Shukla 2004; Aroor et al. 2010; Jung et al. 2010; Ku et al. 2007).
In a screen for Drosophila melanogaster mutants with abnormal ethanol-induced hyperactivity, we recently identified a loss-of-function mutation in the dtao gene that almost completely abolishes flies' hyperactivity response to ethanol (King et al. 2011). dtao encodes a putative MAP3K of the GCK-VIII subfamily of Ste20p (sterile 20 protein) kinases (Dan et al. 2001). These proteins, also known as TAO (thousand-and-one amino acid) kinases, are characterized by a highly conserved serine/threonine kinase domain, which regulates MAP signaling (Chen & Cobb 2001; Hutchison et al. 1998; Tassi et al. 1999; Yasuda et al. 2007). In addition to their catalytic function, TAO kinases regulate cytoskeletal organization through interaction with actin and tubulin, via a structurally divergent C-terminal tail region (Johne et al. 2008; Mitsopoulos et al. 2003; Moore et al. 2000; Timm et al. 2003; Zihni et al. 2006).
In mammals, dtao is represented by three orthologous genes: Taok1, Taok2 and Taok3 (Yustein et al. 2003). TAOK2, in addition to putative roles in the regulation of actin and tubulin dynamics, regulates neuronal plasticity via activation of p38 and trafficking of cell adhesion molecules arcadlin and N-cadherin (Yamagata et al. 1999; Yasuda et al. 2007), indicating that it may also regulate neuroadaptive changes associated with ethanol exposure. On the basis of these observations, we hypothesized that disruption of the Taok2 gene in mice would alter the behavioral response to ethanol.
Generation of Taok2tm1fl mice
The Taok2tm1 targeting construct was generated using an approach similar to that reported by Aoyama et al. 2005. Briefly, a C57BL/6J-derived bacterial artificial chromosome clone (RP23-142A14) comprising the Taok2 gene was obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA), digested with BamHI and BsrBI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and shotgun subcloned into the BamHI/SmaI sites of vector pBSDT-AII (Aoyama et al. 2005). Plasmid-transformed Escherichia coli colonies were screened by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the following primers: forward: 5′GCTGAGGCTACCTCCTCCTT, reverse: 5′TGCTGCTTATGCAGTTGGAC to identify an 8.7 kb genomic clone containing exons 1–7 of Taok2 and flanking intronic sequence. DNA from insert-containing plasmids was incubated with plasmid pMODloxZeoΔamp3 (Aoyama et al. 2005) in the presence of EZ:Tn transposase (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI, USA) to introduce two lox P sites flanking a zeocin selectable marker. The position and orientation of this insertion was determined by sequencing. Plasmid DNA from this clone was incubated with Cre recombinase (New England Biolabs) to remove the zeocin selectable marker and combine the two lox P sites into a single site. To introduce a second lox P site into the construct, plasmid DNA from this clone was incubated with plasmid pGPS21loxFRTNeo (Aoyama et al. 2005) in the presence of TnsABC transposase (New England Biolabs). pGPS21loxFRTNeo contains two Tn7-derived transposable elements flanking two lox P sites, two FRT sites and the neomycin phosphotransferase gene (Neo) placed downstream of the EM7 and PGK promotors to confer kanamycin and G418 resistance in E. coli and mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, respectively. Removal of the Neo cassette and one of the lox P sites may be performed either in ES cells or mice with Flpe-mediated recombination. Position and orientation of the insertion into the genomic fragment was determined by sequencing, and a clone with both lox P sites in the same orientation was selected for electroporation in ES cells. Sequence analysis of the entire insert of the resulting targeting construct verified insertion of lox P sites within the first and seventh introns of the Taok2 gene and confirmed that the remaining genomic sequence was left intact. Mouse ES cells and transgenic mice targeting Taok2 were generated using standard methods by the Transgenic Core Facility at the Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center (EGCRC, Bradley 1987, Hogan et al. 1994). Briefly, DNA from plasmids containing the Taok2-targeted locus was linearized at the PmeI (New England Biolabs) site in the multiple cloning site of the vector and electroporated into C57BL/6-derived ES cells (Primogenix, Laurie, MO, USA). PCR analysis was performed on the resulting G418-resistent clones using a forward primer spanning part of the PGK promotor (5′-GGGGAACTTCCTGACTAGGG) and a reverse primer recognizing mouse genomic sequence immediately 3′ of that included in the targeting construct (5′-AGGGCCTAGGGCAAAATAGA) to assess homologous recombination. Prior to blastocyst injection, the integrity of these targeted ES cell clones was verified by sequence analysis of the targeted region. Cells were injected into C57BL/6Jtyrc-2J-derived blastocysts (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and implanted in pseudopregnant CD1 dams to generate chimeric mice. C57BL/6Jtyrc-2J mice carry a recessive point mutation in the tyrosinase gene resulting in a white coat color, allowing the distinction of targeted cells that confer a black coat color. Chimeric pups obtained from these lines were crossed with C57BL/6Jtyrc-2J mice to test for germline transmission and stabilization of the line, designated, Taok2tm1. Subsequently, Taok2tm1/+ mice were crossed with Flpe mice (Jackson Laboratory) to remove the Neo marker and yield the Taok2tm1fl allele.
Taok2tm1fl/+ mice were intercrossed to generate Taok2tmfl/fl homozygous animals for subsequent crosses. Additionally, Taok2tm1fl/+ mice were mated with B6.Cg-Tg(Nes-cre)1Kln/J/+ mice (Jackson Laboratory). B6.Cg-Tg(Nes-cre)1Kln/J/+ mice, abbreviated ‘Nes-cre/+’, express CRE recombinase in the nervous system under control of the rat nestin promotor (Tronche et al. 1999). Taok2tm1fl/+;Nes-cre/+ mice were crossed to Taok2tm1fl/fl mice to generate Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ mice and littermate controls (Taok2tm1fl/+ mice) for expression analysis and behavioral experiments. In the course of analyzing these crosses, we observed ‘leaky’ germline expression of CRE recombinase in a small subset of progeny. These animals were bred to C57BL/6J mice for 5 generations to generate Taok2+/− mice, which were subsequently intercrossed to generate Taok2−/− mice and controls for behavioral experiments.
Mice were genotyped using DNA isolated from tail biopsies using standard protocols. The following primers were used to genotype progeny from the above described crosses by PCR analysis: forward primer 5′-CCAAGGACCAGACATCCACT and reverse primer 5′-ACCAGTCCTCGTTTTTGCTG were used to detect presence of the wild-type and Taok2tm1fl alleles; forward primer 5′-GATGCAACGAGTGATGAG and reverse primer 5′-TCGGCTATACGTAACAGG were used to detect presence of the Nes-cre transgene; forward primer 5′-TGCAGGGTTTGACAGTTGAT and reverse primer 5′-ACTCTGCCTCAGGAGTCCAA were used to detect presence of the null allele.
Mice were deeply anesthetized with 100 mg/kg of Euthasol® (Virbac, Forth Worth, TX, USA) and intracardially perfused with 0.9% NaCl, followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. Brains were removed, postfixed overnight in the same fixative at 4°C, incubated in 30% sucrose for 48 h for cryoprotection. Frozen sagittal, 50 µm-thick sections were cut on a cryostat (Leica Instruments, Nussloch, Germany). Free-floating sections were incubated in 3% hydrogen peroxide in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 10 min, then in 50% alcohol for 10 min, rinsed in PBS, incubated in 10% normal donkey serum in PBS (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) for 30 min, and incubated overnight in the goat polyclonal antibody recognizing TAOK2 (sc-47447, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA; 1:1000). On the next day sections were rinsed in PBS incubated in 2% normal donkey serum in PBS for 10 min and incubated in biotinylated donkey anti-goat (1:500, Jackson ImmunoResearch) for 3 h, rinsed in PBS and incubated in ExtrAvidin–peroxidase complex (1:2500, Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 h. Peroxidase was histochemically visualized with diaminobenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich). Sections were mounted on gelatin-coated slides, air-dried, dehydrated in graded alcohols, cleared with xylene, and mounted with DPX mounting media (Sigma-Aldrich). Images were taken examined in a Nikon Eclipse E600 microscope equipped with Spot 2 CCD camera (Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI, USA). In control experiments the omission of primary antibody resulted in lack of immunostaining.
Total RNA was isolated from whole brain tissue using Trizol® reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions and was treated with RNase-free DNase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) to remove genomic DNA contamination. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA using reverse transcription reagents from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA). Following synthesis, cDNA was diluted 1:10 in water. TaqMan QPCR was performed using standard thermal cycling conditions on an ABI PRISM 7900 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Amplification reactions contained 5 µl of cDNA template, 1× Universal PCR Master Mix, 100 nm each of forward and reverse primers, and 200 nm of FAM-labeled probe in a final volume of 10 µl. The Taok2 5′probe and primers set spanning exons 4–5 was Applied Biosystems catalog # Mm001139118. Rodent GAPDH probe and primers (Applied Biosystems) were used as a control for the PCR reactions. Data was analyzed using the comparative Ct method (Applied Biosystems user bulletin #2).
Protein extracts were isolated from whole brain tissue in RIPA buffer using standard techniques. Ten microgram protein samples were electrophoresed on NuPAGE 4-12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to PVDF membranes (Invitrogen). Primary antibodies included goat anti-TAOK2 (sc-47447, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) 1:500 and mouse anti-GAPDH (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA), 1:5000. Western blots were incubated with either HRP-linked donkey anti-goat or HRP-linked sheep anti-mouse secondary antibody (GE Healthcare, Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA), 1:5000, and processed with ECL Plus Western Blotting Detection System (GE Healthcare, Biosciences). Chemiluminescence was visualized and quantified using the Storm 660 phosphorimager system (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
Behavioral testing was performed on male mice (to avoid potential behavioral effects of the estrus cycle on behavior) that were 3–6 months of age at time of testing. Behavior was performed as follows: group 1 (Taok2−/− and control animals): open field activity, stationary dowel test, Loss-of-righting reflex (LORR) test and drinking in the dark (DID) with one week rest period between each behavioral test. Group 2 (Taok2−/− and control animals): ethanol metabolism and clearance. Group 3: (Taok2−/− and control animals): ethanol-CPP. Group 4: (Taok2fl/fl:Nes-cre and control mice): LORR test. Group 5: (Taok2fl/fl:Nes-cre and control mice): DID. Group 6: (Taok2fl/fl:Nes-cre and control mice): ethanol metabolism and clearance. All animal protocols were approved by the EGCRC institutional animal care and use committee, which include adequate measures to minimize pain or discomfort.
Stationary dowel test of acute functional tolerance
A stationary wooden dowel (1.5 cm diameter and 30-cm long) was suspended between two Plexiglas walls 50 cm above a cushioned surface. Mice were trained to remain on the stationary dowel for 5 min. Each mouse was then given an intraperitoneal injection of 1.5 g/kg of ethanol (10% w/v in saline) and placed on the dowel. At this dose, subjects were unable to balance on the dowel. After a subject fell from the dowel, it was retested for regain of balance at 5 min intervals until it was able to remain on the dowel for 1 min. Immediately following regain of balance, a blood sample was taken by tail vein puncture (BEC1), the mouse was given a booster injection of 1.5 g/kg ethanol and placed back on the dowel. The time at which the second period of ataxia began was recorded and when the subject fell from the dowel. Recovery was again tested at 5 min intervals until the subject was able to remain on the dowel for 1 min, at which point a second blood sample was taken (BEC2). Acute functional tolerance (AFT) was calculated as the difference between BEC2 and BEC1. The rate at which AFT developed was calculated as (BEC2-BEC1)/duration of ataxia following the booster injection.
Loss-of-righting reflex assay
Ethanol (10% v/v in saline) was administered IP at a dose of 4 g/kg. After injection, mice were placed on their backs and tested for loss of the righting reflex. The mouse was judged to have lost the righting reflex at the time when it could not right itself three times within 30 seconds. When the animal was able to right itself three times within 30 seconds it was deemed to have recovered. The duration of the loss of the righting reflex was calculated as the difference between when the reflex was lost and when it was recovered. For Taok2−/− and control mice, blood ethanol content (BEC) at time of recovery was measured by tail vein bleed.
Drinking in the dark assay
Oral alcohol self-administration was examined using a limited access, DID assay. One week prior to data collection, mice were singly housed and transferred to a reverse light–dark cycle. On day 8 of the experiment, water intake (ml) was measured for the 4-h period beginning 4 h after lights off and body weight (g) was recorded. Subsequently, mice were given access to a single bottle of 20% w/v ethanol during the same time of day, on alternate days for 10 days (i.e. 5 days of data collection) and ethanol consumption was calculated. For Taok2−/− and control mice, water consumption was also measured on alternate days during the same 4 h time period for the duration of the study.
Two-bottle choice assay for taste preference
Taste preference for saccharin (sweet) and quinine (bitter) was examined using a two-bottle choice protocol. Mice were singly housed for 4 days in double-grommet cages with continuous access to two water bottles under standard 12 h light/12 h dark conditions. On day 5, the left water bottle was replaced with a 0.06% w/v solution saccharin in water. On the following day, the amount of saccharin solution and water consumed was determined and the position of the bottles was switched. The next day, saccharin and water consumption were again determined and the procedure was repeated using a 0.03 mm quinine solution (in water) and water.
Conditioned place preference assay and ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation
Ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) was performed using an apparatus (Med Associates, St. Albans, VT, USA) consisting of two open field chambers (each 27.3 × 27.3 cm) separated by a central guillotine door and characterized by custom acrylic floors that are contextually distinct. Ethanol-naïve mice were allowed free access to both chambers of the CPP apparatus for 30 min on day 1 of the experiment to habituate to the apparatus, assess general activity level and initial side-preference. Subjects were then assigned to either of two experimental groups in a counterbalanced design in which ethanol was paired with the right chamber or left chamber. On day 2, subjects received either an intraperitoneal injection of 2 g/kg ethanol or saline prior to placement in one of the two chambers for 5 min. On day 3, subjects that received an ethanol injection on day 2 were given a saline injection and allowed access to the opposite chamber for 5 min. Subjects were thus trained with alternating ethanol and saline treatments for a total of 8 days. On the test day, subjects were allowed free access to both chambers for 30 min, during which the time spent in each chamber was recorded. For baseline activity and ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation, the horizontal activity of subjects on the first day of saline treatment (either day 2 or day 3) was compared with activity on the first day of ethanol treatment (day 2 or day 3).
Open field activity
Locomotor activity measurements were performed in Plexiglas locomotor activity chambers (43 × 43 cm, Med Associates), located in sound-attenuated cubicles equipped with a 2.8 W house light and exhaust fans to mask external noise. The chambers contained two sets of 16 pulse-modulated infrared photobeams on opposite walls to record x, y ambulatory movements and are computer interfaced for data sampling at 100 ms resolution. Mice were placed in chambers for 60 min and the distance traveled (cm) was measured in 5 min bins.
Ethanol metabolism and clearance
Ethanol-naive mice were injected with 4 g/kg of ethanol and tail blood samples (10 µl) were obtained at 10, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 min to measure blood alcohol levels. BEC was assessed from serum using the Analox AM1 Analyzer (Analox Instruments, North Yorkshire, UK).
Data were analyzed using SigmaStat 3.1 software (Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA) with appropriate post-hoc comparisons performed as indicated by SigmaStat. Statistical tests were performed as follows: mRNA and protein quantification in Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ mice was normalized to control littermates and GAPDH signal and compared by Student's t-test . Water consumption data for Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ and control mice were analyzed by Student's t-test and for Taok2−/− and control mice during DID experiments by two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (anova) for genotype × day. AFT and LORR data were analyzed by Student's t-test. Ethanol consumption data during DID experiments were analyzed by two-way repeated-measures anova for genotype × day. Similarly, ethanol clearance data were analyzed by two-way repeated-measures anova for genotype × time. CPP data were analyzed by two-way repeated-measures anova for genotype × time spent in the ethanol-paired chamber on day 1 (habituation) and day 10 (test). Open field activity data were analyzed by two-way repeated-measures anova for genotype × time. Ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation data were also analyzed by two-way repeated-measures anova for genotype × treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Generation and characterization of Taok2−/− and Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre mice
To generate a Taok2 allele in which the gene is conditionally disrupted, we used a modified approach described by Aoyama et al. (2005) and Seong et al. (2004). This approach simplifies construction of a targeting vector by the insertion of lox P sites and selectable markers in a region of interest using in vitro transposition (Aoyama et al. 2005). The targeting construct was made using C57BL/6J-derived genomic DNA, a strain for which fully sequenced bacterial artificial clones (BACs) are commercially available, obviating the need to screen a BAC library and facilitating in silico design of the targeting construct. The resulting C57BL/6 J-derived ES cells were injected into C57BL/6Jtyr-derived blastocysts. C57BL/6Jtyr mice carry a recessive mutation in the tyrosinase gene that results in a white coat color, allowing for the identification of C57BL/6JTaok2tm1fl; C57BL/6Jtyr chimeric pups and germline transmission of the Taok2tm1fl allele in the subsequent generation. An important advantage of this approach over standard mouse transgenesis methods is that the targeted allele is generated on an isogenic background as opposed to a mixed C57BL/6 J X 129-derived background, which may complicate phenotypic analysis (Seong et al. 2004).
We targeted the kinase domain of the Taok2 gene by insertion of lox P sites within introns 1 and 7 to generate the Taok2tm1 allele. In the presence of FLPe recombinase, the neomycin resistance selectable marker was removed to yield the Taok2tm1fl allele (Fig. 1a). This allele, in the presence of a CRE recombinase-expressing transgene, is expected to excise sequences containing exons 2–7 of the Taok2 locus to generate the deleted or Taok2 null allele (Taok2−/−, Fig. 1a).
To disrupt the Taok2 gene specifically in the nervous system, we crossed Taok2tm1fl/fl mice with B6.Cg-Tg(Nes-cre)1Kln/J/+ mice (abbreviated Nes-cre/+). Nes-cre/+ mice express CRE recombinase under control of the rat nestin promotor (Tronche et al. 1999). Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ mice were viable and normal in appearance. In addition, gross brain morphology of Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ mice, as determined by immunohistological analysis, was indistinguishable from that of control animals (Fig. 1b,c). In wild-type mice, we observed abundant TAOK2 expression throughout the brain, including cortex, striatum and hippocampus (Fig. 1b). In contrast, we confirmed near absence of TAOK2 protein in brains of Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ mice (Fig. 1c).
We assessed the efficiency of Nes-cre mediated Taok2 transcript disruption in brains of Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ mice by quantitative PCR (QPCR). QPCR analysis using a 5′ primer/probe set internal to the lox P sites showed nearly 100% excision of the intervening sequence in Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ mice compared with control animals (t(4) = 22.40, P < 0.001, Fig. 1d). These data indicate that the Nes-cre transgene excises exons 2–7 with high efficiency in brains of Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ mice.
In addition to disrupting most of the kinase domain, deletion of exons 2–7 is also expected to remove the translational start site of the Taok2 transcript. To determine if the Nes-cre transgene effectively knocks down TAOK2 protein in brains of Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ mice, we performed Western blot analysis using a polyclonal antibody raised against a peptide mapping to an internal region of the human TAOK2 protein and cross-reacting to mouse TAOK2. This analysis showed nearly complete loss of TAOK2 protein in brain tissue isolated from Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ mice (t(2) = −15.38, P < 0.01) and absence of an aberrantly translated product (Fig. 1e,f). These data suggest that Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ mice are effectively null for the TAOK2 protein in brain tissue.
A loss-of-function mutation in the Drosophila homolog of Taok2, dtao, confers resistance to the locomotor activating effects of ethanol (King et al. 2011). To determine if loss of Taok2 in the mouse alters ethanol-related behaviors, we tested Taok2-deficient and control mice for ethanol-induced ataxia, acute functional tolerance, sedation, ethanol consumption, CPP and ethanol-induced hyperactivity.
To assess sensitivity to the ataxic affects of ethanol and acute functional tolerance, we tested Taok2−/− and control mice in the stationary dowel assay. Taok2−/− mice recovered their balance more quickly from both the first (t(19) = −2.49, P < 0.05, Fig. 2a) and second (t(19) = −2.16, P < 0.05, Fig. 2c) injections of ethanol in this assay, suggesting that they may be acutely resistant to the ataxic effects of ethanol. To further characterize the acute response of Taok2−/− mice to ethanol in this assay, we measured BEC at the time of recovery from both injections and observed that Taok2−/− mice exhibited significantly reduced BEC upon recovery from the first ethanol injection (t(19) = −3.06, P < 0.05, Fig. 2b), whereas BEC values in null mice were comparable to control animals following recovery from the second ethanol injection (t(19) = −0.83, P = 0.42, Fig. 2d). These data indicate a trend toward increased acute functional tolerance to the ataxic effects of ethanol in Taok2−/− mice (t(19) = 1.94, P = 0.07, Fig. 2e).
We next assessed Taok2−/− mice for sensitivity to the sedating effects of ethanol in the LORR assay. After administration of a 4 g/kg injection of ethanol intraperitoneally, we measured the time it took for subjects to recover the righting reflex. Compared with controls, Taok2−/− mice exhibited a trend toward shorter recovery time from ethanol-induced sedation (t(19) = −1.69, P = 0.11, Fig. 2f). At the time of recovery, Taok2−/− mice showed reduced BEC (t(19) = −2.54, P < 0.05, Fig. 2g).
The observation that Taok2−/− mice recover more quickly with reduced BEC levels from both ataxia and sedation-inducing doses of ethanol suggested that Taok2−/− mice may absorb and/or metabolize ethanol more quickly than controls. To address this possibility, we measured BEC levels in Taok2−/− and control mice following a 4 g/kg intraperitoneal dose ethanol across multiple time points and observed a significant main effect of strain, with Taok2−/− mice exhibiting decreased BEC values (F1,13 = 4.56, P < 0.05, Fig. 2h).
Studies in humans and several mouse genetic models have established a negative correlation between sensitivity to the acute effects of ethanol and ethanol consumption or propensity for abuse (Boyce-Rustay et al. 2006; Crabbe et al. 1996; Fee et al. 2004; Kapfhamer et al. 2008; Naassila et al. 2002, 2004; Newton & Messing 2007; Palmer et al. 2004; Schuckit 1994). To assess ethanol consumption in Taok2−/− and control mice, we tested subjects in a limited access, DID assay. This assay involves acclimating subjects to a reverse light–dark schedule and providing access to ethanol for several hours during the middle of the dark period when mice are most active. In contrast to standard, continuous access models, it has been shown that mice in the DID assay typically consume pharmacologically relevant (intoxicating) levels of ethanol, resulting in the blood alcohol levels in excess of 1.0 mg/ml (Rhodes et al. 2005). We observed a significant strain effect for ethanol consumption in the DID assay, with Taok2−/− mice consuming increased amounts of ethanol compared with control animals (main effect of genotype: F1,14 = 5.96, P < 0.05, genotype × time interaction: F4,56 = 2.44, P = 0.06, Fig. 3a). Following the final ethanol session, we measured BEC and found a trend toward increased BEC in Taok2−/− mice (t(14) = 1.73, P = 0.11, Fig. 3b). We measured taste preference for a 0.06% w/v saccharin solution and a 0.03 mm quinine solution and did not observe a significant main effect of genotype for either tastant (t(16) = 0.82, P = 0.43, t(16) = 1.49, P = 0.16, for saccharin and quinine, respectively), indicating the increased ethanol consumption by Taok2−/− mice is likely not because of altered gustation. We also measured water consumption on alternate days during the course of the study and found a trend toward increased consumption (main effect of genotype: F1,14 = 2.56, P = 0.13, genotype × time interaction: F4,56 = 2.16, P = 0.09, Fig. 3c), however, water consumption toward the end of the study (days 5, 7 and 9) was comparable between strains, in contrast to ethanol consumption during this time period (days 6, 8 and 10).
On the basis of our data showing that Taok2−/− mice consume more ethanol than control mice, we investigated whether disruption of the Taok2 gene results in enhanced ethanol-induced CPP, a commonly used assay of the rewarding or motivational effects of drugs of abuse (Chester et al. 1998; Liu et al. 2008). On day 1 of the study (habituation to the chamber), both genotypes exhibited a slight preference for the right side of the apparatus (control: 16.6 ± 0.6 min vs. Taok2−/−: 15.9 ± 1.0 min), however, the genotypes did not differ significantly from one another (t(22) = −0.59, P = 0.56). We trained mice using a 2 g/kg dose ethanol that did not produce ethanol-induced locomotor sensitization in either genotype in our study (effect of day: F3,22 = 1.28, P = 0.29, Fig. 4a) and observed that expression of ethanol-CPP was completely blocked in Taok2−/− mice (main effect of genotype: F1,22 = 8.50, P < 0.01; main effect of day: F1,22 = 12.75, P < 0.05; genotype × day interaction: F1,22 = 6.91, P < 0.05, Fig. 4b).
In addition to place preference, the CPP assay measures general locomotor activity and ethanol-induced hyperactivity. Both wild-type and Taok2−/− mice increased activity in response to ethanol compared with saline treatment (F1,22 = 45.9, P < 0.001; Fig. 4c). However, Taok2−/− mice were generally more active than controls (F1,22 = 9.54, P < 0.005), such that we failed to detect a significant genotype × treatment interaction (F1,22 = 0.41, P = 0.53; Fig. 4c). These data indicate that Taok2−/− mice exhibit normal ethanol-induced hyperactivity when normalized for an increased baseline activity level, in contrast to dtao mutant flies. We further characterized the locomotor hyperactivity phenotype of Taok2−/− and control mice by measuring locomotor activity in an open field apparatus and observed a significant main effect of genotype (F1,20 = 13.2, P < 0.05), time (F11,20 = 23.1, P < 0.001), and genotype × time interaction: (F11,220 = 2.00, P < 0.05), indicating that Taok2−/− mice do not habituate normally to the open field (Fig. 4d).
On the basis of our observations that Taok2−/− mice exhibit multiple ethanol-dependent behavioral phenotypes that may result, wholly or in part, from increased ethanol metabolism, we investigated whether nervous system-specific disruption of the Taok2 gene would result in similar ethanol-dependent phenotypes. To assess sensitivity to the sedating effects of ethanol, we tested Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ and control mice in the loss-of-righting assay. Compared with control mice, Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ mice exhibited a significantly longer recovery time from ethanol (t(12) = 4.10, P < 0.001; Fig. 5a), indicating that nervous system-specific loss of TAOK2 in mice confers increased sensitivity to the sedative effects of ethanol. The increased sensitivity to ethanol observed in Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ mice does not appear to result from altered ethanol absorption and/or clearance, as a separate cohort of subjects did not show a significant strain effect for BEC across a series of time points following treatment with 4 g/kg ethanol (two-way repeated-measures anova, effect of genotype: F1,9 = 4.33, P > 0.05; genotype × time interaction: F5,45 = 0.18, P > 0.05; Fig. 5b).
To assess ethanol consumption in Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ and control mice, we tested subjects in the DID assay. We observed a significant strain effect for ethanol consumption in the DID assay, with Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ mice consuming more ethanol than control mice (effect of genotype: F1,20 = 4.65, P < 0.05, Fig. 5c). BEC levels between strains at the end of the study were comparable (t(20) = 0.49, P = 0.63, Fig. 5d), as was expected since both mutants and control animals consumed similar amounts of ethanol on the last day of the study (Fig. 5c). The increased ethanol consumption of Taok2tm1fl/fl;Nes-cre/+ mice was not a result of an overall increase in fluid consumption as control and mutant mice consumed comparable amounts of water during the habituation period (t(12) = 1.77, P = 0.09, Fig. 5e).
We have generated a conditionally disrupted allele of the Taok2 gene in mice using the Cre/loxP system and show that loss of Taok2 affects multiple behaviors following exposure to ethanol. Specifically, disruption of Taok2 constitutively results in earlier recovery from the ataxic and sedative effects of ethanol, increased ethanol consumption and reduced ethanol-induced CPP. By comparison, nervous system-specific disruption of Taok2 increases recovery time from the sedative effects of ethanol and increases ethanol consumption, indicating that global vs. nervous system-specific disruption of Taok2 results in specific and overlapping ethanol-dependent phenotypes.
The earlier recovery time from ethanol-induced ataxia and sedation we observe in Taok2−/− mice occurs at lower BECs, suggesting that these phenotypes may result from altered ethanol absorption and/or clearance. In fact, we observe altered pharmacokinetics of a 4 g/kg dose ethanol in Taok2−/− mice, which may explain the ethanol sensitivity phenotypes in the stationary dowel and loss-of-right reflex tests. Although TAOK2 is most abundantly expressed in the brain, it is present in other tissues, including liver (http://biogps.org/#goto=genereport&id=9344, and data not shown), the primary site of ethanol metabolism by alcohol dehydrogenase (Lands 1998). Acute ethanol exposure activates JNK and MAPK p38 in hepatocytes (Arror and Shukla 2004; Aroor et al. 2010; Chen et al. 1998), two signaling pathways also engaged by TAOK2 activation (Calderon de Anda et al. 2012; Chen and Cobb 2001; Yasuda et al. 2007). If and how TAOK2-dependent MAPK signaling may affect ethanol metabolism merits further investigation.
Similarly, an increased rate of ethanol metabolism may underlie the increased ethanol consumption and reduced ethanol-induced CPP phenotypes of Taok2−/− mice. We also observed an increase in water consumption of Taok2−/− mice relative to controls during the beginning of the DID study. Interestingly, water consumption among mutant mice normalized to control levels later in the study, when ethanol consumption increased. Since water and ethanol consumption were measured on alternate days, a straightforward interaction between both is not clear. It will be important in future studies to investigate water and ethanol consumption concomitantly using a 2-bottle choice paradigm.
Global disruption of Taok2 impairs ethanol-induced CPP, but fails to affect locomotor hyperactivity, in contrast to disruption of the Drosophila homolog, dtao (King et al. 2011). The ethanol-induced hyperactivity defect of dtao mutants has been shown to be mediated through regulation of the downstream target Par-1, a kinase that has been implicated in the activation of TAU protein and microtubule destabilization. In mammals, PAR1 activity is dependent on TAOK1 (Timm et al. 2003), however, the regulation of PAR1 by TAOK2 or TAOK3 has not been investigated. The possible functional redundancy among mammalian TAOK proteins in regard to PAR1 regulation may explain why we fail to observe altered ethanol-induced hyperactivity defects in Taok2 mutant mice.
In addition to the ethanol ataxia, sedation and consumption phenotypes of Taok2-disrupted mice, we observe that Taok2−/− mice exhibit reduced ethanol-induced CPP. It should be noted that several confounding factor may have affected the behavior of Taok2−/− mice in this assay: as previously mentioned, altered ethanol pharmacokinetics may have affected the formation of ethanol-induced CPP in this line. In addition, Taok2−/− mice are generally hyperactive and show impaired habituation to an open field. Hyperactivity has been reported to disrupt expression of ethanol-induced CPP (Gremel & Cunningham, 2007) and we observed a significant negative correlation between CPP score and activity during the test session (r = −0.479, P < 0.05).
The CPP assay measures the rewarding aspects of a drug of abuse through an associative learning process in which the subject learns to associate the subjective effects of a drug with a specific environment (Schechter & Calcagnetti 1993). Functionally, TAOK2 is involved in the trafficking of cell adhesion molecules NCAM and Arcadlin (Yasuda et al. 2007), which may alter neuroplasticity and, in the case of NCAM disruption, cause spatial learning deficits (Becker et al. 1996; Bukalo et al. 2004; Cremer et al. 1994; Moy et al. 2009; Tang et al. 1998; Venero et al. 2006; Yamagata et al. 1999). Furthermore, ethanol may directly interact with cell adhesion molecules to affect their function (Arevalo et al. 2008; Dou et al. 2011). Taken together, these observations suggest a model whereby altered cell adhesion molecule trafficking and/or function in Taok2 mutant mice may impair ethanol-induced CPP by disrupting normal associative learning processes. Such a model might assume that under normal conditions, the interaction of ethanol with cell adhesion molecules somehow facilitates the associative learning that occurs during CPP training and this process is impaired when TAOK2 is absent, perhaps through its role in cell adhesion molecule trafficking. Additional experiments will be important to determine if Taok2 mutants are deficient in other spatial learning tasks and to what degree trafficking of cell adhesion molecules may be involved. It is interesting to note that mice in which the cell adhesion molecule CD81 has been disrupted are impaired in cocaine-induced CPP (Michna et al. 2001), underscoring the importance of cell adhesion in this behavior.
Perhaps our most interesting finding is that although ethanol metabolism is altered in Taok2−/− mice, ethanol metabolism appears normal in mice in which the Taok2 gene has been disrupted specifically in the nervous system, yet Tao2fl/fl;Nes/cre mice consume increased amounts of ethanol and in contrast to Taok2−/− mice, are sensitive to ethanol in the LORR assay. These data suggest that the nervous system-specific effect of TAOK2 on ethanol sensitivity is masked by peripheral disruption of Taok2 in Taok2−/− mice and that the increased consumption of ethanol in Taok2−/− mice may be independent of the gene's effect on ethanol pharmacokinetics. To further characterize the function of TAOK2 in the nervous system in regulating behavioral sensitivity to ethanol, it will be important to measure BEC levels in Tao2fl/fl;Nes/cre mice upon LORR recovery as well as assessment of acute functional tolerance to ethanol.
Previous studies in humans and rodent models have suggested a negative correlation between initial sensitivity to ethanol and ethanol consumption (Boyce-Rustay et al. 2006; Crabbe et al. 1996; Fee et al. 2004; Kapfhamer et al. 2008; Naassila et al. 2002, 2004; Newton and Messing 2007; Palmer et al. 2004; Schuckit 1994). On the basis of our observation that nervous system-specific disruption of Taok2 confers greater sensitivity to ethanol in the LORR assay, we might predict that Taok2 mutants would consume less ethanol. Instead, we observe that Taok2 mutants actually consume more ethanol than control mice. It may be noted that the LORR assay measures sensitivity to the sedative/hypnotic effects of ethanol, which may be mechanistically distinct from the ataxic effects of lower doses of ethanol and a more accurate predictor of ethanol consumption (Schuckit 1994; Thiele et al. 2002). It will therefore be interesting to examine the ataxic effects of ethanol in Taok2fl/fl;Nes/cre mice.
Cell culture studies have also established a role for TAOK2 in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton (Moore et al. 2000), a function that may also be critical for neuroplasticity (Huntley et al. 2002; Lisman 2003; Matus 2000). A growing body of literature suggests that ethanol exposure may alter actin organization both pre- and postsynaptically (Funk & Dohrman 2007; Mulholland & Chandler 2007; Offenhäuser et al. 2006). Mice lacking the Eps8 gene, which encodes an EGFR substrate and regulator of actin dynamics, are resistant to the acute intoxicating effects of ethanol and show increased ethanol consumption (Offenhäuser et al. 2006), supporting the notion that not only are actin dynamics ethanol-sensitive, but alterations in the cytoskeleton may affect behavioral responses to ethanol. Future experiments should address if altered actin cytoskeleton dynamics underlie the abnormal ethanol responsiveness of Taok2 mutant mice.
Our data provide, to our knowledge, the first evidence that a Ste20p family kinase functions to regulate ethanol-dependent behaviors in mammals. Specifically, TAOK2 regulates ethanol-induced ataxia, sedation, consumption and CPP. Previously, we have shown that the fly homolog, dtao, is required for normal ethanol-induced hyperactivity (King et al. 2011) and mutations in a related Ste20p family kinase gene, happyhour, confers resistance to ethanol-induced sedation in Drosophila (Corl et al. 2009). These data support the conservation of intracellular signaling through Ste20p family kinases in the regulation of behavioral responses to ethanol in flies and mammals and identify novel candidate genes for ethanol use disorders in humans.
- 2005) Simple and straightforward construction of a mouse gene targeting vector using in vitro transposition reactions. Nucleic Acids Res 33, e52. , , , & (
- 2008) An alcohol binding site on the neural cell adhesion molecule L1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105, 371–375. , , , , , & (
- 2004) MAP kinase signaling in diverse effects of ethanol. Life Sci 74, 2339–2364. & (
- 2010) Differential changes in MAP kinases, histone modifications, and liver injury in rats acutely treated with ethanol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 34, 1543–1551. , , & (
- 1996) The polysialic acid modification of the neural cell adhesion molecule is involved in spatial learning and hippocampal long-term potentiation. J Neurosci Res 45, 143–152. , , , , & (
- 2006) Ethanol-related behaviors in serotonin transporter knockout mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 30, 1957–1965. , , , , , & (
- 1987) Production and analysis of chimeric mice. In Robertson, E.J. (ed), Teratocarcinoma and Embryonic Stem Cells: A Practical Approach. IRL Press, Oxford, England. (
- 1991) Neuroadaptive responses to chronic ethanol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 15, 460–470. & (
- 2004) Conditional ablation of the neural cell adhesion molecule reduces precision of spatial learning, long-term potentiation, and depression in the CA1 subfield of mouse hippocampus. J Neurosci 24, 1565–1577. , , , , , , , & (
- 2012) Autism spectrum disorder susceptibility gene TAOK2 affects basal dendrite formation in the neocortex. Nat Neurosci 15, 1022–1031. , , , , , , , , , , & (
- 2003) Ethanol and brain plasticity: receptors and molecular networks of the postsynaptic density as targets of ethanol. Pharmacol Ther 99, 311–326. (
- 1998) Effects of ethanol on mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in normal and regenerating liver. Biochem J 334, 669–676. , , , & (
- 2001) Regulation of stress-responsive mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways by TAO2. J Biol Chem 276, 16070–16075. & (
- 1998) Ethanol reward and aversion in mice bred for sensitivity to ethanol withdrawal. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 22, 468–473. , & (
- 2009) Happyhour, a Ste20 family kinase, implicates EGFR signaling in ethanol-induced behaviors. Cell 137, 949–960. , , , , , & (
- 2007) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and its intracellular signaling pathways in cocaine addiction. Neuropsychobiology 55, 2–13. , , , & (
- 1996) Elevated alcohol consumption in null mutant mice lacking 5-HT1B serotonin receptors. Nat Genet 14, 98–101. , , , , , & (
- 1994) Inactivation of the N-CAM gene in mice results in size reduction of the olfactory bulb and deficits in spatial learning. Nature 367, 455–459. , , , , , , , , , , , & (
- 2001) The Ste20 group kinases as regulators of MAP kinase cascades. Trends Cell Biol 11, 220–230. , & (
- 2002) Expression profiling identifies strain-specific changes associated with ethanol withdrawal in mice. Genes Brain Behav 1, 35–45. & (
- 1994) MAPKs: new JNK expands the group. Trends Biochem Sci 19, 470–473. (
- 2011) Two alcohol binding residues interact across a domain interface of the L1 neural cell adhesion molecule and regulate cell adhesion. J Biol Chem 286, 16131–16139. , , , & (
- 2004) Predictors of high ethanol consumption in RIIbeta knock-out mice: assessment of anxiety and ethanol-induced sedation. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 28, 1459–1468. , , , , & (
- 2010) Gene expression changes in the medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens following abstinence from cocaine self-administration. BMC Neurosci 11, 29. , , , , , & (
- 2007) Chronic ethanol exposure inhibits dopamine release via effects on the presynaptic actin cytoskeleton in PC12 cells. Brain Res 1185, 86–94. & (
- 2007) Role of test activity in ethanol-induced disruption of place preference expression in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 191, 195–202. & (
- 1981) Membrane fluidity and alcohol actions. Curr Alcohol 8, 379–404. & (
- 2007) Prevalence, correlates, disability, and comorbidity of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64, 830–842. , , & (
- 2003) Pharmacogenomic analysis of mechanisms mediating ethanol regulation of dopamine beta-hydroxylase. J Biol Chem 278, 38860–38869. , , & (
- 2000) Protein phosphorylation cascades associated with methamphetamine-induced glial activation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 914, 238–262. & (
- 1994) Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York. , , & (
- 2002) Structural remodeling of the synapse in response to physiological activity. Cell 108, 1–4. , & (
- 1998) Isolation of TAO1, a protein kinase that activates MEKs in stress-activated protein kinase cascades. J Biol Chem 273, 28625–28632. , & (
- 2008) Spred1 and TESK1 – -two new interaction partners of the kinase MARKK/TAO1 that link the microtubule and actin cytoskeleton. Mol Biol Cell 19, 1391–1403. , , , , & (
- 2010) Ethanol withdrawal acts as an age-specific stressor to activate cerebellar P38 kinase. Neurobiol Aging 32, 2266–2278. , , , , & (
- 2008) Loss of RAB-3/A in Caenorhabditis elegans and the mouse affects behavioral response to ethanol. Genes Brain Behav 7, 669–676. , , , , , & (
- 2011) Drosophila tao controls mushroom body development and ethanol-stimulated behavior through par-1. J Neurosci 31, 1139–1148. , , , , , , & (
- 2001) Region-specific transcriptional response to chronic nicotine in rat brain. Brain Res 909, 194–203. , , , , , , , , & (
- 2008) The complexity of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) made simple. Cell Mol Life Sci 65, 3525–3544. & (
- 2007) Ethanol-induced oxidative stress is mediated by p38 MAPK pathway in mouse hippocampal cells. Neurosci Lett 419, 64–67. , , , , , , , , , & (
- 1998) A review of alcohol clearance in humans. Alcohol 15, 147–160. (
- 2003) Actin's actions in LTP-induced synapse growth. Neuron 38, 361–362. (
- 2008) Conditioned place preference induced by licit drugs: establishment, extinction, and reinstatement. Scientific World Journal 8, 1228–1245. , , , & (
- 2000) Actin-based plasticity in dendritic spines. Science 290, 754–758. (
- 2001) Altered sensitivity of CD81-deficient mice to neurobehavioral effects of cocaine. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 90, 68–74. , , , , , , , , , & (
- 2003) The prostate-derived sterile 20-like kinase (PSK) regulates microtubule organization and stability. J Biol Chem 278, 18085–18091. , , , & (
- 2010) Neuroscience of alcoholism: molecular and cellular mechanisms. Cell Mol Life Sci 67, 73–88. , , & (
- 2000) PSK, a novel STE20-like kinase derived from prostatic carcinoma that activates the c-Jun N-terminal kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway and regulates actin cytoskeletal organization. J Biol Chem 275, 4311–4322. , , , , & (
- 2009) Impaired sociability and cognitive function in Nrcam-null mice. Behav Brain Res 205, 123–131. , , , & (
- 2007) The thorny side of addiction: adaptive plasticity and dendritic spines. Scientific World Journal 7, 9–21. & (
- 2002) Low ethanol sensitivity and increased ethanol consumption in mice lacking adenosine A2A receptors. J Neurosci 22, 10487–10493. , & (
- 2004) Decreased alcohol self-administration and increased alcohol sensitivity and withdrawal in CB1 receptor knockout mice. Neuropharmacology 46, 243–253. , , & (
- 2006) Intracellular signaling pathways that regulate behavioral responses to ethanol. Pharmacol Ther 109, 227–237. & (
- 2007) Increased sensitivity to the aversive effects of ethanol in PKCepsilon null mice revealed by place conditioning. Behav Neurosci 121, 439–442. & (
- 2006) Increased ethanol resistance and consumption in Eps8 knockout mice correlates with altered actin dynamics. Cell 127, 213–226. , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & (
- 2004) Corticotropin-releasing factor overexpression decreases ethanol drinking and increases sensitivity to the sedative effects of ethanol. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 176, 386–397. , , , , , & (
- 2005) Evaluation of a simple model of ethanol drinking to intoxication in C57BL/6J mice. Physiol Behav 84, 53–63. , , , & (
- 1993) Trends in place preference conditioning with a cross-indexed bibliography; 1957–1991. Neurosci Biobehav 17, 21–41. & (
- 1994) Low level of response to alcohol as a predictor of future alcoholism. Am J Psychiatry 151, 184–189. (
- 1995) The MAPK signaling cascade. FASEB J 9, 726–735. & (
- 2004) To knockout in 129 or in C57BL/6: that is the question. Trends Genet 20, 59–62. , , & (
- 1997) Regulation of the ERK subgroup of MAP kinase cascades through G protein-coupled receptors. Cell Signal 9, 337–351. & (
- 2002) Neuronal p38 MAPK signalling: an emerging regulator of cell fate and function in the nervous system. Genes Cells 7, 1099–1111. & (
- 1998) A role for the cadherin family of cell adhesion molecules in hippocampal long-term potentiation. Neuron 20, 1165–1175. , & (
- 1999) Human JIK, a novel member of the STE20 kinase family that inhibits JNK and is negatively regulated by epidermal growth factor. J Biol Chem 274, 33287–33295. , , , & (
- 2002) Voluntary alcohol consumption is controlled via the neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor. J Neurosci 22, RC208. , & (
- 2003) MARKK, a Ste20-like kinase, activates the polarity-inducing kinase MARK/PAR-1. EMBO J 22, 5090–5101. , , , , , & (
- 1999) Disruption of the glucocorticoid receptor gene in the nervous system results in reduced anxiety. Nat Genet 23, 99–103. , , , , , , , & (
- 2006) Hippocampal up-regulation of NCAM expression and polysialylation plays a key role on spatial memory. Eur J Neurosci 23, 1585–1595. , , , , , , & (
- 1999) Arcadlin is a neural activity-regulated cadherin involved in long term potentiation. J Biol Chem 274, 19473–19479. , , , , , , , , , , & (
- 2007) Activity-induced protocadherin arcadlin regulates dendritic spine number by triggering N-cadherin endocytosis via TAO2beta and p38 MAP kinases. Neuron 56, 456–471. , , , , , , , , , , & (
- 2003) Comparative studies of a new subfamily of human Ste20-like kinases: homodimerization, subcellular localization, and selective activation of MKK3 and p38. Oncogene 22, 6129–6141. , , , , & (
- 2006) Prostate-derived sterile 20-like kinase 2 (PSK2) regulates apoptotic morphology via C-Jun N-terminal kinase and Rho kinase-1. J Biol Chem 281, 7317–7323. , , , & (
The authors thank Dr. Y. Wada at Osaka University, Osaka, Japan for plasmids used to generate the Taok2 targeting construct, and Drs. R. Messing and D. Ron for helpful discussions. This work was supported by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health and by the State of California for medical research on alcohol and substance abuse through UCSF.