Comparison of manual versus sonic and ultrasonic toothbrushes: a review
Article first published online: 24 APR 2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00234.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Costa, M., Marcantonio, R. and Cirelli, J. (2007), Comparison of manual versus sonic and ultrasonic toothbrushes: a review. International Journal of Dental Hygiene, 5: 75–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00234.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 24 APR 2007
- Article first published online: 24 APR 2007
- Dates: Accepted 23 January 2007
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- electric toothbrushes;
- oral hygiene;
- plaque
Abstract:
Purpose: This review of the literature intends to evaluate the effect of brushes with high frequency motion when compared with manual toothbrushes regarding the indices of plaque and gingival bleeding. Methods: Patients presenting gingivitis and/or chronic periodontitis were evaluated in addition to patients having osseointegrated implants and fixed orthodontic appliances. Pertinent literature was reviewed to select articles according to previously defined inclusion criteria. Results: In the assessed studies results showed significant decreases in plaque and gingival indices by utilization of both types of brushes. However, in the selected studies where sonic brushes were tested in orthodontic and dental implant patients there was a more significant decrease in the indices. Furthermore, there was no indication of gingival recession attributed to product use. Conclusion: Future studies with a more homogeneous methodology and better experiment designs will be needed.

1601-5037/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=87c355833abdd79a9ea957630ee807f88d5733dc)
1601-5037/asset/olbannerright.jpg?v=1&s=b6b3a11e33d4ccd6dd2820c49570266c19ca8575)
