SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Almquist S, (1919). Sveriges Rosae. Idun, Stockholm .
  • Black-Samuelsson S, Eriksson G, Gustafsson L and Gustafsson P, (1997). RAPD and morphological analysis of the rare plant species Vicia pisiformis (Fabaceae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 61: 325343.
  • Blackburn K and Heslop-Harrison JW, (1921). The status of the British rose forms as determined by their cytolog-ical behaviour. Ann. Bot. 35: 159188.
  • Blackhurst HT, (1948). Cytogenetic studies on Rosa rubiginosa and its hybrids. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 52: 510516.
  • Debener T, Bartels C and Mattiesch L, (1996). RAPD analysis of genetic variation between a group of rose cultivars and selected wild rose species. Mol. Breeding 2: 321327.
  • Gomez R, Angel F, Bonierbale M, Rodriguez F, Tohme J and Roca WM, (1996). Inheritance of random amplified polymorphic DNA markers in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Genome 39: 10391043.
  • Graham GG and Primavesi AL, (1993). Roses of Great Britain and Ireland. BSBI Handbook No 7, Botanical Society of the British Isles, London .
  • Gustafsson A, (1944). The constitution of the Rosa canina complex. Hereditas 30: 405428.
  • Gustafsson A and Schroderheim J, (1944). Ascorbic acid and hip fertility in Rosa species. Nature 153: 196197.
  • Holm S, (1995). Unexpectedly high levels of genetic variation in Potentilla argentea L. (s.l.) in southern Sweden. Hereditas 123: 127139.
  • Jenczewski E, Gherardi M, Bonnin I, Prosperi JM, Oliviero I and Huguet T, (1997). Insight on segregation distortions in two intraspecific crosses between annual species of Medicago (Leguminosae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 9: 682691.
  • Jicinska D, (1976). Morphological features of F, generation in Rosa hybrids 1. Hybrids of some species of the sect. Caninae with Rosa rugosa. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. Praha 11: 301311.
  • Jicinska D, Koncalova MN and Sykorova O, (1976). Studies in rose pollen III. Pollen viability and germinability in eight Czechoslovak Rosa species, Preslia. Praha 48: 347353.
  • Keskitalo M, Lindén A and Valkonen JPT, (1998). Genetic and morphological diversity of Finnish tansy (Tanacetum vulgare L., Asteraceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 11411150.
  • Ko MK, Yang J, Jin YH, Lee CH and Oh BJ, (1998). Genetic relationships of Viola species evaluated by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. J. Horticult. Sci. & Biotech 73: 601605.
  • Kroon GH and Zeilinga AE, (1974). Apomixis and heterogamy in rose rootstocks (Rosa canina L.). Euphytica 23: 345352.
  • Lerceteau E, Quiros J, Soria J, Flipo S, Petiard V and Crouzilat D, (1997). Genetic differentiation among Ecuadorian Theobroma cacao L. accessions using DNA and morphological analysis. Euphytica 95: 7787.
  • Magdalita PM, Drew RA, Adkins SW and Godwin ID, (1997). Morphological, molecular and cytological analyses of Carica papaya x C. cauliflora interspecific hybrids. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 224229.
  • Malmgren U, (1986). Slaktet Rosa i Sverige. Sv. Bot. Tidskr. 80: 209227.
  • McLellan T, (2000). Geographic variation and plasticity of leaf shape and size in Begonia dregei and B. homonyma (Begoniaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 132: 7995.
  • Melville R, (1960). A metric study of leaf shape in hybrids: I. The leaf-shapes of some F, hybrids and their parents. Kew Bull. 14: 88102.
  • Melville R, (1975). Rosa L. In: Hybridization and the flora of the British Isles. (ed. CAStace) A. P., London , p. 212227.
  • Millan T, Osuna F, Torres AM and Cubero JI, (1996). Using RAPDs to study phylogenetic relationships in Rosa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 273277.
  • Nilsson Ö, (1967). Drawings of Scandinavian plants 1–8., Rosa L. Hot. Not. 120: 18, 137–143, 249–254, 393–408
  • Norusis MJ, (1990a). SPSS® Base systems user's guide. SPSS Inc, Chicago .
  • Norusis MJ, (1990b). SPSS® Advanced statisticsTM user's guide. SPSS Inc, Chicago .
  • Nybom H, Olsson Å and Werlemark G, (1996). Morpholmetric variation in Nordic dogroses (Rosa sect. Caninae, Rosaceae). Acta Univ. Ups. Symb. Bot Ups. 31: 5968.
  • Nybom H, Carlson-Nilsson U, Werlemark G and Uggla M, (1997). Different levels of morphometric variation in three heterogamous dogrose species (Rosa sect. Caninae, Rosaceae). Plant. Syst. Evol. 204: 207224.
  • Nybom H, Esselink D, Werlemark G and Vosman B, (2000). Inheritance of microsatellite DNA markers in hemisexual dogroses, Rosa L. sect. Caninae. In: Werlemark G, Genetic variability and reproductive strategies in Nordic dogroses, Rosa section Caninae. Doctoral thesis, Dept. of Horticultural Plant Breeding, Swedish university of agricultural sciences, Alnarp.
  • Olsson A, Nybom H and Prentice H, (2000). Relationships between Nordic dogroses (Rosa L. Sect. Caninae, Rosaceae) assessed by RAPDs and Fourier analysis of leaflet shape. Syst. Bot. 25: 511521.
  • Ortiz JPA, Pessino SC, Leblanc O, Hayward MD and Quarin CL, (1997). Genetic fingerprinting for determining the mode of reproduction in Paspalum notatum, a subtropical apomictic forage grass. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 850856.
  • Padgett DJ, Les DH and Crow GE, (1998). Evidence for the hybrid origin of Nuphar X rubrodisca (Nymphaeaceae). Am. J. Bot. 85: 14681476.
  • Persson HA and Gustavsson BA, (2001). The extent of clonality and genetic diversity in lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) revealed by RAPDs and leaf-shape analysis. Mol. Ecol. (in press).
  • Rieseberg L and Ellstrand NC, (1993). What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 12: 213241.
  • Rossetto M, Weaver PK and Dixon KW, (1995). Use of the RAPD analysis in devising conservation strategies for the rare and endangered Grevillea scapigera (Proteaceae). Mol. Ecol. 4: 321329.
  • Rowley G, (1960). Aneuploidy in the genus Rosa. J. Genetics 57: 253268.
  • Selin E, (2000). Morphometric differentiation between populations of Papaver radicatum (Papaveraceae) in northern Scandinavia. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133: 263284.
  • Sydes MA and Peakall R, (1998). Extensive clonality in the endangered shrub Haloragodendron lucasii (Halorago-ceae) revealed by allozymes and RAPDs. Mol. Ecol. 7: 8793.
  • Täckholm G, (1920). On the cytology of the genus Rosa. Sv. Bot. Tidskr. 14: 300311.
  • Werlemark G, (2000). Evidence of apomixis in hemisexual dogroses, Rosa section Caninae. Sex. Plant. Repr. 12: 353359.
  • Werlemark G, Carlson-Nilsson U, Uggla M and Nybom H, (1995). Effects of temperature treatments on seedling emergence in dogroses, Rosa Sect. Caninae L. Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. B, Soil PI. Sci. 45: 278282.
  • Werlemark G, Uggla M and Nybom H, (1999). Morphological and RAPD markers show a highly skewed distribution in a pair of reciprocal crosses between hemisexual dogrose species, Rosa sect. Caninae. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 557563.
  • White RJ and Prentice HC, (1988). Comparison of shape description methods for biological outlines. In: Classification and related methods of data analysis, (ed. HHBock), Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam , p. 395402.
  • White RJ, Prentice HC and Verwijst T, (1988). Automated image acquisition and morphometric description. Can. J. Bot. 66: 450459.
  • Wissemann V and Hellwig FH, (1997). Reproduction and hybridisation in the genus Rosa Section Caninae (Ser.). Rehd. Bot. Acta 110: 251256.
  • Zielinski J, (1985). Studia nad radzajem Rosa L. System-atyka sekcji Caninae DC. em. Christ. Arbor Kornickie 30: 3109.