SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Abd-El-Khalick F. and Lederman N. G. 2000. Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 22: 665701.
  • Abd-El-Khalick F., Bell R. L. and Lederman N. G. 1998. The nature of science and instructional practice: making the unnatural natural. Sci. Educ. 82: 417436.
  • Alberts B. 2009. Redefining science education. Science 323: 437.
  • Alters B. 1997. Whose nature of science? J. Res. Sci. Teach. 34: 3955.
  • AAAS 1989. Science for all Americans, chapter one, [online] <www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/default.htm> accessed 26 May 2010.
  • AAAS 2009. Conference mobilizes educators to transform undergraduate biology education. <www.aaas.org/news/releases/2009/0821biology_conference.shtml> accessed 20 February 2010.
  • Bartholomew H., Osborne J. and Ratcliffe M. 2004. Teaching students ideas about science: five dimensions of effective practice. Sci. Educ. 88: 655682.
  • Bell R. 2001. Implicit instruction in technology integration and the nature of science: there's no such thing as a free lunch. Contemp. Iss. Tech. Teach. Educ. <www.citejournal.org/vol1/iss4/currentissues/science/article2.htm> accessed 12 Aug 2010.
  • Clough M. 2007. Teaching the nature of science to secondary and post-secondary students: questions rather than tenets. The Pantaneto Forum 25, <www.pantaneto.co.uk/issue25/clough.htm> accessed 18 Feb 2010.
  • Clough M., Olson J., Vanderlinden D. et al. 2007. The impact of historical short stories on post-secondary biology and geology students’ understanding of science content and the nature of science. Paper presented at the Natl Conf. Ass. Sci. Teach. Educ. (ASTE), Clearwater, FL, USA.
  • Correns C. 1900. G. Mendel's Regel über das Verhalten der Nachkommenshaft der Rassenbastarde. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 8: 158168.
  • Darwin C. 1861. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. – John Murray, London, UK.
  • Darwin C. 1868. The variation of animals and plants under domestication (2 volumes). – John Murray, London, UK.
  • de Vries H. 1900a. Das Spaltungsgesetz der Bastarde. Ber. Dtsch Bot. Ges. 18: 8390.
  • de Vries H. 1900b. Sur la loi de disjonction des hybrides. C. R. l'Acad. Sci. 130: 845847.
  • Fairbanks D. J. and Rytting B. 2001. Mendelian controversies: a botanical and historical review. Am. J. Bot. 88: 737752.
  • Franklin A., Edwards A. W. F., Fairbanks D. J. et al. 2008. Ending the Mendel-Fisher controversy. – Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Gribbin J. 2002. The scientists. – A history of science told through the lives of its greatest inventors. – Random House, NY.
  • Gould S. J. 1987. Evolution and human equality. – In: KatzR. (prod.), National History Magazine Video. Insight Video, Cambridge, MA.
  • Gould S. J. 1996. Full house the spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin. – Three Rivers Press, NY.
  • Hartwell L., Hood L., Goldberg M. et al. 2004. Genetics: from genes to genomes (2nd ed.). – McGraw Hill Higher Education, MA.
  • Kenyon L. and Reiser B. 2006. A functional approach to nature of science: using epistemological understandings to construct and evaluate explanations. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April 2006.
  • Kimball M. 1967. Understanding the nature of science: a comparison of scientists and science teachers. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 5: 110120.
  • Lederman N. G., Abd-El-Khalick F., Bell R. L. et al. 2002. Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 39: 497521.
  • Lonsbury J. and Ellis J. 2002. Science history as a means to nature of science concepts: using the development of understanding related to mechanisms of inheritance. Electron. J. Sci. Educ. 7: vol. 2.
  • Maienschein J. 1999. Commentary to the future: arguments for science literacy. Sci. Comm. 21: 7587.
  • Matthews M. 1998. In defense of modest goals when teaching about the nature of science. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 35: 161174.
  • Matthews M. 2000. Forward and introduction. – In: McComasW. (ed.), The nature of science in science education rationales and strategies. Kluwer, pp. xixxi.
  • McComas W. 2008. Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Sci. Educ. 17: 249263.
  • McComas W. Clough M. and Almazroa H. 2000. The role and character of the nature of science. – In: McComasW. (ed.), The nature of science in science education rationales and strategies. Kluwer, pp. 339.
  • Mendel G. 1866. Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden. Verhandlungen des Naturforschenden Vereines, Abhandlungern, Brünn, 4: 347. Editions in different languages published by Matlová (1973).
  • Metz D., Klassen S. and McMillan B. et al. 2007. Building a foundation for the use of historical narratives. Sci. Educ. 16: 313334.
  • Moore J. 1993. Science as way of knowing: the foundations of modern biology. – Harvard Univ. Press.
  • Moore J. 1986. Opening remarks: thinking and deciding. Am. Zool. 26: 573581.
  • National Academy of Sciences 2008. The role of theory in advancing 21st century biology: catalyzing transformative research. – The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
  • National Research Council 1996. National science education standards. – National Academic Press, Washington, DC.
  • National Research Council 2000. Inquiry and the national science education standards. – National Academic Press, Washington, DC.
  • National Research Council 2007. Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K–8. – National Academic Press, Washington, DC.
  • Olby R. C. 1979. Mendel no Mendelian? Hist. Sci. 17: 5372.
  • Orel V. 1996. Gregor Mendel: the first geneticist. – Oxford Univ. Press.
  • Orel V. and Hartl D. L. 1994. Controversies in the interpretation of Mendel's discovery. Hist. Philos. Life Sci. 16: 423464.
  • Pomeroy D. 1993. Implications of teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science: comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers and elementary teachers. Sci. Educ. 77: 261278.
  • Popper K. 1963. Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. – Routledge, NY.
  • Roberts H. F. 1965. Plant hybridization before Mendel. – Hafner Publishing Co., NY.
  • Rutherford J. and Ahlgren A. 1991. Science for all americans. – Oxford Univ. Press.
  • Schwarz R. and Lederman N. 2008. What Scientists Say: Scientists’ views of the nature of science and relation to science context. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 30: 727771.
  • Science and Engineering Indicators, 2010. Available online at: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind10/pdf/c07.pdf [Assessed 28 May, 2010].
  • SternC. and SherwoodE. R. [eds] 1966. – The origin of genetics: a Mendel source book. – W. H. Freeman.
  • Tschermak E. 1900. Über künstliche Kreuzung bei Pisum sativum. Berichte der deutschen botanischen Gesellschaft 18: 232239.
  • Union of Concerned Scientists. 2010. Available online at http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/what_you_can_do/science-as-a-way-of-knowing.html [Assessed 10 May 2010].
  • Westerlund J. and Fairbanks D.J. 2005. An Understanding of Gregor Mendel's Contributions to Science from a Nature of Science Perspective. Paper presented at the Eighth International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching (IHPST), Leeds United Kingdom, p. 93.