SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Bijlsma R., Westerhof M. D. D., Roekx L. P. et al. 2010. Dynamics of genetic rescue in inbred Drosophila melanogaster populations. Conserv. Genet. 11: 449462.
  • Casimir D. L., Moehrenschlager A. and Barclay R. M. R. 2007. Factors influencing reproduction in captive Vancouver Island marmots: implications for captive breeding and reintroduction programs. J. Mamm. 88: 14121419.
  • Edmands S. 2007. Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management. Mol. Ecol. 16: 463475.
  • Edmands S. and Timmerman C. C. 2003. Modeling factors affecting the severity of outbreeding depression. Conserv. Biol. 17: 883892.
  • Falconer D. S. 1965. Genetic aspects of fertility in mice. J. Reprod. Fertil. 10: S298S299.
  • Falconer D. S. and Mackay T. F. C. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. – Longman, Ltd.
  • Franceschini-Zink C. and Millesi E. 2008. Reproductive performance in female common hamsters. Zoology 111: 7683.
  • Frankham R. 2008. Genetic adaptation to captivity in species conservation programs. Mol. Ecol. 17: 325333.
  • Frankham R., Ballou J. D., Eldridge M. D. B. et al. 2011. Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conserv. Biol. 25: 465475.
  • Fredrickson R. J., Siminski P., Woolf M. et al. 2007. Genetic rescue and inbreeding depression in Mexican wolves. Proc. R. Soc. B 274: 23652371.
  • Hedrick P. W. 2005. Genetics of populations. – Jones and Bartlett Publ., Boston, MA.
  • Hedrick P. W. and Kalinowski S. T. 2000. Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 139162.
  • Hedrick P. W. and Fredrickson R. 2010. Genetic rescue guidelines with examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers. Conserv. Genet. 11: 615626.
  • Hufnagl S., Franceschini-Zink C. and Millesi E. 2011. Seasonal constraints and reproductive performance in female common hamsters (Cricetus cricetus). Mamm. Biol. 76: 124128.
  • Kalinowski S. T., Hedrick P. W. and Miller P. S. 2000. Inbreeding depression in the Speke's gazelle captive breeding program. Conserv. Biol. 14: 13751384.
  • Kayser A. 2002. Populationsökologische Studien zum Feldhamster Cricetus cricetus (L., 1758) in Sachsen-Anhalt. – PhD-thesis, Martin-Luther-Univ. Halle-Wittenberg.
  • Keller L. F. and Waller D. M. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 230241.
  • Kuiters L., La Haye M., Müskens G. et al. 2007. Survival analysis to predict the predation risk in reintroduced populations of the common hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in the Netherlands. V Eur. Congr. of Mammalogy, Siena, Italy. Hystrix, Italian J. Mamm. Vol. I, supp. 2007.
  • La Haye M. 2008. Is there a genetic future for the hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in western Europe? Proc. 14th Meeting of the Int. Hamster Workgroup; Munsterschwarzach, Germany, p. 10.
  • La Haye M. J. J., Neumann K. and Koelewijn H. P. 2012. Strong decline of gene diversity in local populations of the highly endangered common hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in the western part of its European range. Conserv. Genet. 13: 311322.
  • Leberg P. L. and Firmin B. D. 2008. Role of inbreeding depression and purging in captive breeding and restoration programmes. Mol. Ecol. 17: 334343.
  • Losík J., Lisická L., Hríbková J. et al. 2007. Demografická struktura a procesy v přírodní populaci křečka polního (Cricetus cricetus) na Olomoucku. Demographic structure and processes in a natural population of the common hamster (Cricetus cricetus) in the Olomouc region (Czech Republic). Lynx (Praha) N.S., 38: 2129.
  • Madsen T., Shine R., Olsson M. et al. 1999. Conservation biology – restoration of an inbred adder population. Nature 402: 3435.
  • Mitchell-Jones A. J., Amori G., Bogdanowicz W. et al. 1999. The Atlas of European Mammals.
  • Monecke S. and Wollnik F. 2008. How to increase the reproductive success in common hamsters: shift work in the breeding colony. – Biol. Ecol. Ser. No. 25. Aust. Acad. Sci. Press, Vienna, Austria.
  • Nechay G. 2000. Status of hamsters: Cricetus cricetus, Cricetus migratorius, Mesocricetus newtoni and other hamster species in Europe. Convention of the conservation of European wildlife and natural habitats. Nature and Environment Ser., No. 106. Council of Europe, Strasbourg.
  • Neumann K. and Jansman H. 2003. Genetical status of the common hamster in the Netherlands and other European countries, consequences for conservation in the Netherlands and Belgium. Proc. 10th Meeting of the Int. Hamster Workgroup; Tongeren, Belgium.
  • Neumann K., Jansman H., Kayser A. et al. 2004. Multiple bottlenecks in threatened western European populations of the common hamster Cricetus cricetus (L.). Conserv. Genet. 5: 181193.
  • Peripato A. C., De Brito R. A., Matioli S. R. et al. 2004. Epistasis affecting litter size in mice. J. Evol. Biol. 17: 593602.
  • Pimm S. L., Dollar L. and Bass O. L. Jr 2006. The genetic rescue of the Florida panther. Anim. Conserv. 9: 115122.
  • Quaas R. L. 1988. Additive genetic model with groups and relationships. J. Dairy Sci. 71: 13381345.
  • Richards C. M. 2000. Inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a plant metapopulation. Am. Nat. 155: 383394.
  • Robert A. 2009. Captive breeding genetics and reintroduction success. Biol. Conserv. 142: 29152922.
  • Rocha J. L., Eisen E. J., Siewerdt F. et al. 2004. A large-sample QTL study in mice: III. Reproduction. Mamm. Genet. 15: 878886.
  • Schwartz M. K. and Mills L. S. 2005. Gene flow after inbreeding leads to higher survival in deer mice. Biol. Conserv. 123: 413420.
  • Tallmon D. A., Luikart G. and Waples R. S. 2004. The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 489496.
  • Ulbrich K. and Kayser A. 2004. A risk analysis for the common hamster (Cricetus cricetus). Biol. Conserv. 117: 263270.
  • Westemeier R. L., Brawn J. D., Simpson S. A. et al. 1998. Tracking the long-term decline and recovery of an isolated population. Science 282: 16951698.