Parental craniofacial morphology in cleft lip with or without cleft palate as determined by cephalometry: a meta-analysis
Article first published online: 18 JAN 2006
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Volume 9, Issue 1, pages 18–30, February 2006
How to Cite
Weinberg, S., Maher, B. and Marazita, M. (2006), Parental craniofacial morphology in cleft lip with or without cleft palate as determined by cephalometry: a meta-analysis. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research, 9: 18–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2006.00339.x
- Issue published online: 18 JAN 2006
- Article first published online: 18 JAN 2006
- Dates: Accepted 29 October 2005
- face shape hypothesis;
- parental phenotype
Authors – Weinberg SM, Maher BS, Marazita ML
Objective – To integrate findings from previous cephalometric studies comparing the craniofacial complex of unaffected parents with cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) children to controls with no history of the disease.
Design – Meta-analysis of case-control cephalometric data.
Inclusion criteria – Studies were selected if the unaffected parents of children with CL/P were included and were not combined with parents of children with isolated CP; quantitative data were obtained through cephalometry; the cephalometric variables used were not unique to a study; a case-control design was used; and the means and standard deviations for all variables were reported or could be calculated for both the experimental and the control group.
Outcome measure – Using raw data obtained from nine studies, mean weighted effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for 28 cephalometric variables (mothers and fathers combined) or 18 variables (mothers and fathers separately). Heterogeneity statistics for the effect sizes were also calculated.
Results – In general, unaffected parents of children with CL/P possessed significantly wider interorbital, nasal cavity and upper facial dimensions, narrower cranial vaults, longer cranial bases, longer and more protrusive mandibles, shorter upper faces and longer lower faces compared with controls. Increased width of the nasal cavity was the most robust finding. Significant effect size heterogeneity was observed in roughly half of the variables examined.
Conclusion – Unaffected parents of children with CL/P are characterized by a suite of consistent, yet subtle, craniofacial differences, which could indicate an underlying genetic liability.