Hypo-osmolar oral rehydration salts solution in dehydrating persistent diarrhoea in children: double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial
Article first published online: 2 JAN 2007
Volume 89, Issue 4, pages 411–416, April 2000
How to Cite
Dutta, P., Mitra, U., Dutta, S., Manna, B., Chatterjee, M., De, A. and Bhattacharya, S. (2000), Hypo-osmolar oral rehydration salts solution in dehydrating persistent diarrhoea in children: double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Acta Paediatrica, 89: 411–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2000.tb00078.x
- Issue published online: 2 JAN 2007
- Article first published online: 2 JAN 2007
- Received May 25, 1999; revision received Sept. 10, 1999; accepted Nov. 5, 1999
- hypo-osmolar oral rehydration salts solution;
- outcome variables;
- persistent diarrhoea
A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was conducted to compare the clinical efficacy of hypo-osmolar oral rehydration salts (ORS) solution (224 mmol/L) and standard ORS solution (311mmol/L) in children with persistent diarrhoea who were prone to develop dehydration. Initially, 95 children aged between 3 and 24 mo were included in the study for overnight observation. Of these, 70 children who passed stool more than 2 g/kg/h were finally enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned either standard ORS or hypo-osmolar ORS. After decoding the identity of ORS, it was observed that 37 children were in the standard ORS group and 33 in the hypo-osmolar ORS group. Clinical parameters and microbiological findings of stool samples were comparable in the two groups at the time of enrolment. Total stool output (2.5 ± 1.1 vs 3.2 ± 1.6 kg; p= 0.04), duration of diarrhoea (114.8 ±38.3 vs 145.4 ± 40.0 h; p = 0.002), total intake of ORS (5.4 ± 1.6 vs 7.8 ± 1.8 l; p = 0.002) and total fluid intake (7.9 ± 2.6 vs 10.0 ±4.1 l, p= 0.01) were significantly less in the hypo-osmolar ORS group compared to the standard ORS group. However, the percentage of weight gain on recovery in the hypo-osmolar group was less compared to that of the standard ORS group, though the difference was statistically insignificant. Thirty-five (95%) children in the standard ORS and 33 (100%) children in the hypo-osmolar group recovered within 10 d of initiation of therapy and modified dietary management.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that hypo-osmolar ORS has beneficial effects on the clinical course of dehydrating persistent diarrhoea.