Physical activity positively predicts bone architecture and bone strength in adolescent males and females

Authors

  • Heather McKay,

    1. Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, BC, Canada
    2. Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, BC, Canada
    3. Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, University of British Columbia, BC, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Danmei Liu,

    1. Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, BC, Canada
    2. Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, University of British Columbia, BC, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Deetria Egeli,

    1. Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, BC, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Steven Boyd,

    1. Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Melonie Burrows

    1. Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, BC, Canada
    2. Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, University of British Columbia, BC, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author

Dr Heather McKay, Departments of Orthopaedics and Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Room 588, 828 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1L8.
Tel: 604 875 5346 |
Fax: 604 875 4762 |
Email: heather.mckay@ubc.ca

Abstract

Aims:  Physical activity (PA) has positive effects on bone accrual and geometry in children during growth. However, we do not know how PA influences adaptations in bone architecture during growth. We evaluated the contribution of PA to bone density, architecture and strength in adolescents.

Methods:  We used HR-pQCT (XtremeCT, Scanco Medical) to assess cross-sectional moments of inertia [Imin, Imax (mm4)], total bone density (Tt.Dn, mg HA/cm3), total bone area (Tt.Ar, mm2), cortical bone density (Ct.Dn, mg HA/cm3), cortical thickness (Ct.Th, μm), trabecular bone density (Tb.Dn, mg HA/cm3), trabecular number (Tb.N, mm−1) and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th, μm) at the distal tibia in 146 male and 132 female participants (15–20 years). We evaluated the contribution of impact loading PA (ImpactPA) and non-impact loading PA (NoimpactPA) on bone (p < 0.05).

Results:  ImpactPA explained 10% of variance in Imin (p = 0.000), and 12% of variance in Imax (p = 0.000) in male participants. In male participants, ImpactPA explained 6% of variance in Tt.Ar (p = 0.003). In female participants, ImpactPA explained 4% of variance in Tt.Dn (p = 0.011), 5% of variance in Tb.Dn (p = 0.004) and 8% of variance in Tb.N (p = 0.001).

Conclusion:  Our findings suggest that ImpactPA is significantly associated with bone architecture and bone strength in adolescent males and females.

Ancillary