Abstract
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Key notes
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgement
- References
Aim: This study evaluates whether accelerometer-measured physical activity is related to higher composite risk factor scores for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in children.
Methods: Cross-sectional study that included 223 children aged 7.9–11.1 years (boys n = 123, girls n = 100). Daily physical activity was assessed by accelerometers for 4 days. Body fat was quantified by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Maximal oxygen uptake was measured during a maximal exercise test. Resting heart rate and blood pressure were measured. Z-scores [(value for the individual − mean value for group)/SD] were calculated for each variable, and the sum of different risk factor z-scores used as an index of composite risk factors score for CVD.
Results: Partial correlations, from General Linear Model, between moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), vigorous physical activity (VPA) and general physical activity versus index of composite risk factor score were in boys 0.29, 0.33 and 0.30 (all p < 0.05), respectively. The corresponding correlations in girls were −0.28, −0.32 (both p < 0.05) and −0.18 (NS), respectively.
Conclusion: Low amounts of MVPA and VPA were related to higher composite risk factor scores for CVD in children aged 8–11 years.
Introduction
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Key notes
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgement
- References
It is well known that physical inactivity in adults is associated with a wide range of diseases and all causes of death (1). The arteriosclerotic process begins at an early age and risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) such as physical inactivity, obesity and high blood pressure tend to cluster, and they are directly correlated to asymptomatic arteriosclerosis (2,3). Most studies in children have, however, only explored the relation between physical activity and a single risk factor for CVD (4,5), whereas data with broader analysis are scarce (6,7).
A principal barrier of studying health-related aspects of physical activity in children is the difficulties of obtaining an accurate assessment of a child’s physical activity level. Wide ranges of self-report methods have previously been used in health research because of their low cost and ease of administration. This raises concern because they are known to have limited accuracy in the measurement of daily physical activity in subjects of all ages and are considered inappropriate to use in younger children (8). In contrast, accelerometers record both the intensity and frequency of activity and are therefore an objective method of assessment of physical activity (9,10). This technique could therefore have the ability to give new insights into the relationships between physical activity and risk factors for CVD.
The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate the relation between objectively measured physical activity and composite risk factor scoring for CVD in young children.
Results
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Key notes
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgement
- References
A complete data set was available in 223 children (girls n = 100, boys n = 123). A total of 20 children were excluded because of lack of sufficient accelerometer data. Two children had no blood pressure measurements, one child did not have an adequate exercise test and two did not have DXA measurements. Five girls were Tanner stage 2 and the rest of the participants were Tanner stage 1.
The anthropometric data are displayed in Table 1. There were no significant differences between boys and girls with regard to SBP, DBP, MAP and PP. Significant differences were found for rHR between boys and girls.
Table 1. Anthropometrics, age, cardiovascular variables, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), physical activity and fitness | | Girls n = 100 | Boys n = 123 | p-Value |
|---|
|
| Anthropometrics and age |
| Age (years) | 9.8 ± 0.6 | 9.8 ± 0.6 | 0.36 NS |
| Height (cm) | 140 ± 8 | 140 ± 7 | 0.97 NS |
| Body mass (kg) | 35 ± 8 | 34 ± 8 | 0.85 NS |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 17.5 ± 2.9 | 17.4 ± 2.8 | 0.77 NS |
| Cardiovascular variables |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 105 ± 9 | 104 ± 8 | 0.55 NS |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 61 ± 7 | 60 ± 6 | 0.17 NS |
| Resting heart rate (beats/min) | 85 ± 10 | 80 ± 11 | <0.01 |
| Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) | 76 ± 7 | 75 ± 5 | 0.22 NS |
| Pulse pressure (mmHg) | 44 ± 7 | 45 ± 5 | 0.66 NS |
| DXA |
| Total body fat mass (kg) | 8.3 ± 5.2 | 6.3 ± 4.9 | <0.01 |
| Percent body fat (%) | 22.6 ± 9.0 | 16.2 ± 8.7 | <0.001 |
| Abdominal fat mass (kg) | 3.3 ± 2.4 | 3.4 ± 2.2 | <0.01 |
| Body fat distribution | 0.38 ± 0.05 | 0.36 ± 0.04 | <0.05 |
| Physical fitness |
| VO2PEAK (mL/min/kg) | 35.7 ± 6.3 | 41.7 ± 7.2 | <0.001 |
| Physical activity |
| General physical activity (mean counts/min) | 620 ± 154 | 746 ± 240 | <0.001 |
| Moderate–vigorous physical activity (min) | 35 ± 13 | 45 ± 20 | <0.001 |
| Vigorous physical activity (min) | 11 ± 7 | 15 ± 10 | <0.001 |
Boys had lower TBF, percentage body fat and AFM. In addition, boys had higher VO2PEAK and were more physically active.
Partial correlations, from GLM, between different physical activity levels and individual z-scores are shown in Table 2, where boys and girls were analysed together with adjustment for gender and school location. Significant differences were observed between genders in all physical activity levels (VPA, MVPA and GPA) and individual z-scores for all DXA measurements and for VO2PEAK. Additionally, VPA was significantly correlated to individual z-scores of SBP and rHR but reached only borderline significance for MAP (p = 0.07). MVPA partial correlations with DBP, MAP and rHR were in the hypothesized direction but reached only borderline significance (p = 0.09, p = 0.06 and p = 0.09).
Table 2. Partial correlations between different physical activity levels and individual z-scores for boys and girls (n = 223), with adjustment for gender and school location | | SBP | DBP | MAP | PP | rHR | BF% | AFM | AFM/TBF | VO2PEAK |
|---|
|
| General physical activity | −0.11 p = 0.13 | −0.08 p = 0.25 | −0.11 p = 0.11 | −0.05 p = 0.48 | −0.09 p = 0.18 | −0.31 p < 0.001 | −0.28 p < 0.001 | −0.20 p < 0.01 | 0.23 p < 0.001 |
| Moderate–vigorous physical activity | −0.10 p = 0.16 | −0.12 p = 0.09 | −0.13 p = 0.06 | −0.01 p = 0.87 | −0.12 p = 0.09 | −0.32 p < 0.001 | −0.29 p < 0.001 | −0.21 p < 0.01 | 0.32 p < 0.001 |
| Vigorous physical activity | −0.14 p < 0.05 | −0.08 p = 0.26 | −0.12 p = 0.07 | −0.09 p = 0.19 | −0.15 p < 0.05 | −0.38 p < 0.001 | −0.34 p < 0.001 | −0.23 p < 0.001 | 0.28 p < 0.001 |
GLM-derived partial correlations for physical activity and the sum of z-scores (composite risk factor score for CVD) are shown in Table 3, where boys and girls were analysed separately. There were significant correlations between VPA and MVPA and the sum of z-scores in both boys and girls, while GPA only was significantly correlated with the sum of z-scores in boys.
Table 3. Partial correlations between different physical activity levels and sum of z-scores (composite risk factor score for cardiovascular disease), with adjustment for school location | | Sum of z-scores for boys (n = 123) | Sum of z-scores for girls (n = 100) |
|---|
| Vigorous physical activity | −0.33 p < 0.001 | −0.32 p < 0.01 |
| Moderate–vigorous physical activity | −0.29 p < 0.01 | −0.28 p < 0.01 |
| General physical activity | −0.30 p < 0.001 | −0.18 NS |
General Linear Model analysis showed that 10% of the variance in the sum of z-scores could be explained by VPA and 8% by MVPA. The analyses were also performed for boys and girls separately. A total of 11% of the variance in composite risk factor score could be explained by VPA, 8% by MVPA and 11% by GPA in boys. The corresponding findings in girls were VPA (10%) and MVPA (8%). GPA variance was not analyses in girls as GLM partial correlations did not show significant correlations between sum of z-score and GPA.
Discussion
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Key notes
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgement
- References
The salient finding of the present investigation was the inverse relationship between physical activity and composite risk factor score for CVD. Children that were physically more active tended to have lower composite risk factor scores for CVD compared with children with a lower amount of MVPA and VPA. This was also observed for children with higher amounts of GPA in boys. Between 8% and 11% of the variance in composite risk factor score could be explained by the different physical activity measurements. This may not only represent statistically significant findings but also represent a clinically relevant association.
The index used in the present investigation was composed of a number of separate risk factors for CVD, such as SBP, DBP, MAP and PP (16,24), rHR (25), VO2PEAK (1) and body fat measurements (26). Numerous studies in children have studied relationships between physical activity and single risk factors for CVD, such as physical activity and body fat (5,27–29), physical activity and blood pressure (30), and physical activity and aerobic fitness (5,31). Data on more comprehensive analyses of the relationship between objectively measured physical activity and risk factors for CVD are scarce. We are aware of only two population-based studies in younger subjects that have evaluated the relationship between objectively measured physical activity and risk factor for CVD in a broader analysis. Hurtig-Wennlof et al. (7) investigated a population-based sample of 1125 subjects aged 9–10 and 15–16 years. Physical activity (GPA and MVPA) was assessed by accelerometry for four consecutive days and related to sum of skin folds, SBP, DBP, aerobic fitness and serum levels of triglycerides, cholesterol and insulin resistance. Univariate analyses were used, and this study indicated that the amount of physical activity correlates weakly to single risk factors for CVD. There is, to our knowledge, only one study that has related objectively measured physical activity to composite risk factor score for CVD in a population-based sample in children (6). Andersen et al. investigated both single risk factors and also performed a comprehensive analysis of composite risk factor score for CVD related to GPA and daily accumulation of 5 or 10 min bouts of physical activity above 2000 counts/min (6). Their finding was a clear graded relationship where the quintile with highest activity displayed lowest accumulation of risk factors and a steady increase in accumulation of risk factors could be observed with decreasing activity quintiles. This study confirmed the results from the above-mentioned studies, but differs in some aspects. MAP, rHR and PP were included in this investigation. Furthermore, DXA was used, which is a more accurate measurement for the quantification of body fat, instead of sum of four skin folds and BMI. In the current study, blood samples were not included; hence, it is not possible to include risk factors such as serum levels of triglycerides, cholesterol or insulin.
Much of the correlation between physical activity variables and composite risk factor score for CVD in the current study was driven by body fat measurements and VO2PEAK. Daily accumulation of VPA was, however, associated with single z-scores for SBP, rHR, BF%, AFM and VO2PEAK in GLM analysis. In addition, we present correlations in the hypothesized direction for all physical activity variables versus all other investigated risk factors. The nonsignificance for some of these relationships could be attributed to limited sample size. The principal purpose, however, with the current analyses was to investigate the relationship between physical activity and composite risk factor score for CVD. The accumulation of these risk factors, if started in early childhood and sustained during a long time is believed to have greater impact on CVD and mortality than one single risk factor (6), and aggregation of CVD risk factors ‘increase the severity of asymptomatic coronary and aortic atherosclerosis in young children’ (2). The advantage of a composite risk factor score analysis is that it yields a comprehensive perspective. The disadvantage is that each factor is given equal importance as the sum of z-scores is added together, and this may be assumptive.
The main strengths of this study include the use of direct measurements of physiological variables, including measurement of physical activity with accelerometers, quantifying body fat with DXA and aerobic fitness assessed by direct measurement of VO2PEAK. We are aware of the limitations of a cross-sectional study, which cannot differentiate cause and effect. Moreover, it is not possible at present to say whether children who spend less amount of their time physically active will develop CVD as adults. It is, though, of great interest that these changes can be observed even at this young age and questions arise whether it is the low amount of physical activity that leads to these effects or that children that have higher composite risk factor score tend to be less physically active. One of the weaknesses of this study was the somewhat low inclusion frequency (52%), although no differences in height, body mass and BMI were found between the children who participated and did not participate in the study (4). In addition, there is no ‘gold standard’ method for measuring daily physical activity. Accelerometers have in recent years gained popularity as an objective measurement device for daily physical activity and represent a substantial improvement to self-reporting methods (8). Accelerometers may, however, have limitations. A critical issue is how to select cut-off points to define different activity intensities. There is no consensus regarding which cut-off points to use to define MVPA and VPA (5). There are several proposed cut-off points, and the range for defining the lower limit for MVPA or VPA is significant. Our selections of cut-off points were based on a combination of two large validation studies (19,20), which appears a reasonable approach because a conclusive and comprehensive validation study is absent. One should however be cautious about the exact number of minutes of MVPA and VPA performed per day because this is heavily influenced by the selection of cut-off points. Our practice to stratify the population according to quartiles partly eliminates this problem.