avsc1159-sup-0001-AppendixS1.docWord document233KAppendix S1. Correspondence between the eight EUNIS habitat types with fitted models and the phytosociological alliances to which the plots were originally ascribed. Syntaxonomical nomenclature follows Bolòs et al. (2005). See Table 1 for description of habitat types.
avsc1159-sup-0002-AppendixS2.docxWord document42KAppendix S2. Number of plots vs number of UTM for each habitat type with indication of those habitat types with fitted (white triangles) and non-fitted (black rhombus) models. The curvilinear relationship between these variables was significant (y = 59.052e0.0216x, Spearman R2 = 0.83, P < 0.001). See Table 1 for habitat type description.
avsc1159-sup-0003-AppendixS3.docxWord document14KAppendix S3. Test of ranges comparing a set of descriptive statistics for habitat types with non-fitted (i.e. ‘Non-modelled’) and fitted (i.e. ‘Modelled’) models. Non-parametric statistics were performed to test the differences between both categories of habitats.
avsc1159-sup-0004-AppendixS4.docxWord document25KAppendix S4. List of neophyte species found in the eight modelled EUNIS habitat types, with their family and Raunkiaer's life form (Th: therophyte, H: hemicryptophyte, G: geophyte, Ch: chamaephyte, P: phanerophyte). The number of plots per habitat type where each species was found is indicated. See Table 1 for habitat type description.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.