Co-ordinating Editor: P. S. White.
Explaining patterns of primary production from individual level traits
Article first published online: 11 JUN 2009
© 2009 International Association for Vegetation Science
Journal of Vegetation Science
Volume 20, Issue 4, pages 612–619, August 2009
How to Cite
Leoni, E., Altesor, A. and Paruelo, J.M. (2009), Explaining patterns of primary production from individual level traits. Journal of Vegetation Science, 20: 612–619. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01080.x
- Issue published online: 6 JUL 2009
- Article first published online: 11 JUN 2009
- Received 12 November 2007;Accepted 11 March 2008.
- grazing response;
- growth rate
Question: Do species traits explain differences in productivity in grazed and ungrazed plots?
Location: Río de la Plata grasslands, Uruguay (31°54′S, 58°15′W).
Methods: In a greenhouse experiment, we measured the relative growth rate (RGR) of grasses with contrasting responses to grazing (increasers and decreasers). We performed six harvests at weekly intervals in order to calculate the RGR and assess 12 plant traits. We compared the RGR between increaser and decreaser species after 2 and 5 weeks using t-tests. Linear and potential regression models were fitted to time versus natural logarithm of total dry biomass relationships. The RGR temporal trajectories of increaser and decreaser species were obtained from the derivatives of the best-fit functions. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to sort species according to their traits.
Results: The RGR of decreaser grasses was higher than that of increasers at the second week, while at the fifth week the opposite was observed. The RGR of decreasers dropped through time, while the RGR of increaser species was constant. The PCA separated increaser from decreaser species. The attributes related to increaser species were: high specific leaf area, tillering rate, green leaf rate, total leaf number, root weight ratio and leaf weight ratio; while those associated with decreaser species were: high dead biomass, senescence rate, reproductive biomass, leaf elongation rate and total biomass.
Conclusions: Traits possessed by decreasers reduce light availability and increase the reproductive investment, explaining the drop in RGR. Specific differences in RGR seem to scale up to the ecosystem level and would explain the pattern in aboveground net primary production observed in the field under contrasting grazing regimes.