Get access

Seedling growth and morphology of three oak species along field resource gradients and seed mass variation: a seedling age-dependent response

Authors


  • Co-ordinating Editor: Dr. Lindsay Turnbull.

  • Pérez-Ramos, I.M. (corresponding author, Ignacio.PEREZ-RAMOS@cefe.cnrs.fr), Gómez-Aparicio, L. (lorenag@inase.csic.es), García, L.V. (ventura@cica.es) & Marañón, T. (teodoro@irnase.csic.es): Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla, CSIC, P.O. Box 1052, Sevilla 41080, Spain.
    Villar, R. (bv1vimor@uco.es): Área de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.
    Gómez-Aparicio L.: Present address-Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria, INIA, Crta. de la Coruña, km. 7, 5 28040, Madrid, Spain.

Abstract

Question: What is the relative importance of seed mass and abiotic factors in species-specific seedling growth and morphology during the first and the second growing season? How do oak species respond along gradients of these factors?

Location: Mediterranean oak forest in southern Spain.

Methods: We analysed seedling growth components and morphology of three co-occurring Quercus species (two deciduous and one evergreen). Oak seeds with a wide variety of sizes were sown along broad gradients of abiotic conditions. Intra- and inter-specific differences were evaluated by calibrating maximum likelihood estimators of seedling growth during the first two years of life.

Results: We found multiple resources and conditions affecting seedling morphology and biomass allocation. However, the integrative variables of seedling growth – total aboveground biomass and relative growth rate (RGR) – were affected by two main factors: seed mass and light conditions. The relative contribution of these two factors depended strongly on seedling age. Seed mass explained most of the growth and morphological variables during the first year, while light conditions were the best predictor in the second growing season. In contrast, soil factors did not play an important role in seedling growth. We found some evidence of regeneration niche partitioning between oak species along the light gradient, a reflection of their distribution patterns as adults at the study site.

Conclusions: We conclude that inter-specific differences in seedling growth, arising from seed size variability and microsite heterogeneity, could be of paramount importance in oak species niche segregation, driving stand dynamics and composition along environmental gradients.

Ancillary