de Bello, F. (corresponding author, email@example.com), Lavergne, S. (firstname.lastname@example.org) & Thuiller, W. (email@example.com): Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, UMR CNRS 5553, Université Joseph Fourier, 38041, Grenoble Cedex 9, France. Meynard, C.N. (firstname.lastname@example.org): UMR 5554 - ISEM, Université Montpellier II, Place Eugène Bataillon, CC 065, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France. Lepš, J. (email@example.com): Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia and Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre of ASCR, Branišovská 31, CZ-37005 Ceské Budejovice, Czech Republic. de Bello, F.: Present address: Department of Functional Ecology, Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, CZ-379 82 Třeboň, Czech Republic.
The partitioning of diversity: showing Theseus a way out of the labyrinth
Article first published online: 21 MAY 2010
© 2010 International Association for Vegetation Science
Journal of Vegetation Science
Volume 21, Issue 5, pages 992–1000, October 2010
How to Cite
De Bello, F., Lavergne, S., Meynard, C. N., Lepš, J. and Thuiller, W. (2010), The partitioning of diversity: showing Theseus a way out of the labyrinth. Journal of Vegetation Science, 21: 992–1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01195.x
Co-ordinating Editor: Dr. Valério Pillar.
- Issue published online: 1 SEP 2010
- Article first published online: 21 MAY 2010
- Received 29 June 2009;Accepted 4 April 2010.
- Biodiversity turnover;
- Community assembly;
- Functional diversity;
- Phylogenetic diversity;
- Simpson index
A methodology for partitioning of biodiversity into α, β and γ components has long been debated, resulting in different mathematical frameworks. Recently, use of the Rao quadratic entropy index has been advocated since it allows comparison of various facets of diversity (e.g. taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional) within the same mathematical framework. However, if not well implemented, the Rao index can easily yield biologically meaningless results and lead into a mathematical labyrinth. As a practical guideline for ecologists, we present a critical synthesis of diverging implementations of the index in the recent literature and a new extension of the index for measuring β-diversity. First, we detail correct computation of the index that needs to be applied in order not to obtain negative β-diversity values, which are ecologically unacceptable, and elucidate the main approaches to calculate the Rao quadratic entropy at different spatial scales. Then, we emphasize that, similar to other entropy measures, the Rao index often produces lower-than-expected β-diversity values. To solve this, we extend a correction based on equivalent numbers, as proposed by Jost (2007), to the Rao index. We further show that this correction can be applied to additive partitioning of diversity and not only its multiplicative form. These developments around the Rao index open up an exciting avenue to develop an estimator of turnover diversity across different environmental and temporal scales, allowing meaningful comparisons of partitioning across species, phylogenetic and functional diversities within the same mathematical framework. We also propose a set of R functions, based on existing developments, which perform different key computations to apply this framework in biodiversity science.