SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Archaux, F., Gosselin, F., Bergès, L. & Chevalier, R. 2006. Effects of sampling time, species richness and observer on the exhaustiveness of plant censuses. Journal of Vegetation Science 17: 299306.
  • Ascherson, P. 1864. Flora der Provinz Brandenburg, der Altmark und des Herzogthums Magdeburg. Hirschwald, Berlin, DE.
  • Bäßler, M., Jäger, E. & Werner, K. (eds.). 1996. Exkursionsflora von Deutschland. Band 2: Gefäßpflanzen: Grundband. 16th ed. Fischer, Jena, DE.
  • Benkert, D., Fukarek, F. & Korsch, H. (eds.) 1996. Verbreitungsatlas der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Ostdeutschlands. Fischer, Jena, DE.
  • Berendsohn, W.G. 1995. The concept of “potential taxa” in databases. Taxon 44: 207212.
  • Berendsohn, W.G. 1997. A taxonomic information model for botanical databases: the IOPI Model. Taxon 46: 283309.
  • Berendsohn, W.G., Döring, M., Geoffroy, M., Glück, K., Güntsch, A., Hahn, A., Kusber, W.-H., Li, J., Röpert, D. & Specht, F. 2003. The Berlin Model: a concept-based taxonomic information model. In: Berendsohn, W.G. (ed.) MoReTax – handling factual information linked to taxonomic concepts in biology [Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde no. 39]. pp. 1542. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Bonn, DE.
  • Berg, C., Dengler, J., Abdank, A. & Isermann, M. (eds.). 2004. Die Pflanzengesellschaften Mecklenburg-Vorpommerns und ihre Gefährdung – Textband. Weissdorn, Jena, DE.
  • Botta-Dukát, Z., Kovács-Láng, E., Rédei, T., Kertész, M. & Garadnai, J. 2007. Statistical and biological consequences of preferential sampling in phytosociologiy: theoretical considerations and a case study. Folia Geobotanica 42: 141152.
  • Canhos, V.P., Souza, S., Giovanni, R. & Canhos, D.A.L. 2004. Global biodiversity informatics: setting the scene for a “new world” of ecological modelling. Biodiversity Informatics 1: 113.
  • Chytrý, M. 2001. Phytosociological data give biased estimates of species richness. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 439444.
  • Chytrý, M. (ed.). 2007. Vegetation of the Czech Republic – 1. Grassland and heathland vegetation [in Czech, with English summary]. Academia, Praha, CZ.
  • Chytrý, M., Maskell, L.C., Pino, J., Pyšek, P., Vilà, M., Font, X. & Smart, S.M. 2008. Habitat invasions by alien plants: a quantitative comparison among Mediterranean, subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 448458.
  • Dengler, J. 1994. Flora und Vegetation von Trockenrasen und verwandten Gesellschaften im Biosphärenreservat Schorfheide-Chorin. Gleditschia 22: 179321.
  • Dengler, J., Chytrý, M. & Ewald, J. 2008. Phytosociology. In: Jørgensen, S.E. & Fath, B.D. (eds.) Encyclopedia of ecology. pp. 27672779. Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
  • Dengler, J., Löbel, S. & Dolnik, C. 2009. Species constancy depends on plot size – a problem for vegetation classification and how it can be solved. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 754766.
  • Ehrendorfer, F. (ed.) 1973. Liste der Gefäßpflanzen Mitteleuropas. 2nd ed. Fischer, Stuttgart, DE.
  • Ewald, J. 2001. Der Beitrag pflanzensoziologischer Datenbanken zur vegetationsökologischen Forschung. Berichte der Reinhold-Tüxen-Gesellschaft 13: 5369.
  • Ewald, J. 2003. A critique for phytosociology. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 291296.
  • Ewald, J., May, R. & Kleikamp, M. 2006. VegetWeb – die pflanzensoziologische online-Datenbank unter http://www.floraWeb.de. In: Berg, C., Bergmeier, E., Hövelmann, T. & Ristow, M. (eds.) Ein Netzwerk für botanischen Naturschutz – Neue Herausforderungen für die Botanikerinnen und Botaniker Deutschlands [BfN-Skripten no. 178]. pp. 127131. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn, DE.
  • Franz, N.M. & Peet, R.K. 2009. Towards a language for mapping relationships among taxonomic concepts. Systematics and Biodiversity 7: 520.
  • Hennekens, S. & Schaminée, J. 2001. TURBOVEG, a comprehensive data base management system for vegetation data. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 589591.
  • Jäger, E.J. & Werner, K. (eds.) 2005. Exkursionsflora von Deutschland. Band 4: Gefäßpflanzen: Kritischer Band. 10th ed. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, München, DE.
  • Jansen, F. & Dengler, J. 2008. GermanSL – eine universelle taxonomische Referenzliste für Vegetationsdatenbanken. Tuexenia 28: 239253.
  • Jones, M.B., Schildhauer, M.P., Reichman, O.J. & Bowers, S. 2006. The new bioinformatics: integrating ecological data from the gene to the biosphere. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 37: 519544.
  • Kennedy, J., Hyam, R., Kukla, R. & Paterson, T. 2006. A standard data model representation for taxonomic information. OMICS 10: 220230.
  • Knollová, I., Chytrý, M., Tichý, L. & Hájek, O. 2005. Stratified resampling of phytosociological databases: some strategies for obtaining more representative data sets for classification studies. Journal of Vegetation Science 16: 479486.
  • Koperski, M., Sauer, M., Braun, W. & Gradstein, S.R. 2000. Referenzliste der Moose Deutschlands – Dokumentation unterschiedlicher taxonomischer Auffassungen [Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde no. 34]. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn, DE.
  • Mahecha, M.D. & Schmidtlein, S. 2008. Revealing biogeographical patterns by nonlinear ordinations and derived anisotropic spatial filters. Global Ecology and Biogeography 17: 284296.
  • Otýpková, Z. & Chytrý, M. 2006. Effects of plot size on the ordination of vegetation samples. Journal of Vegetation Science 17: 465472.
  • Roleček, J., Chytrý, M., Hájek, M., Lvončík, S. & Tichý, L. 2007. Sampling design in large-scale vegetation studies: do not sacrifice ecological thinking to statistical purism!. Folia Geobotanica 42: 199208.
  • Schaminée, J.H.J., Stortelder, A.H.F. & Weesthoff, V. (eds.). 1995. De Vegetatie von Nederland – Deel 1. Inleiding tot de plantensociologie – grondslagen, methoden en toepassingen. Opulus, Uppsala, SE.
  • Schaminée, J.H.J., Hennekens, S.M., Chytrý, M. & Rodwell, J.S. 2009. Vegetation-plot data and databases in Europe: an overview. Preslia 81: 173185.
  • Scott, W.A. & Hallam, C.J. 2003. Assessing species misidentification rates through quality assurance of vegetation monitoring. Plant Ecology 165: 101115.
  • Stuessy, T.F. 2009. Plant taxonomy: the systematic evaluation of comparative data. 2nd ed. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, US.
  • Thau, D. & Ludäscher, B. 2007. Reasoning about taxonomies in first-order logic. Ecological Informatics 2: 195209.
  • Tüxen, R. 1972. Kritische Bemerkungen zur Interpretation pflanzensoziologischer Tabellen. In: Tüxen, R. (ed.) Grundfragen und Methoden in der Pflanzensoziologie [Bericht über das Internationale Symposium der Internationalen Vereinigung für Vegetationskunde 1970]. pp. 168182. Junk, Den Haag, NL.
  • Tutin, T.G., Burges, N.A., Chater, A.O., Edmondson, J.R., Heywood, V.H., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M. & Webb, D.A. (eds.) 1993. Flora Europaea – Volume 1: Psilotaceae to Platanaceae. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Vittoz, P. & Guisan, A. 2007. How reliable is the monitoring of permanent vegetation plots? A test with multiple observers. Journal of Vegetation Science 18: 413422.
  • Wamelink, G.W.W., Goedhart, P.W., Van Dobben, H.F. & Berendse, F. 2005. Plant species as predictors of soil pH: replacing expert judgement with measurements. Journal of Vegetation Science 16: 461470.
  • Wisskirchen, R. & Haeupler, H. 1998. Standardliste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands. Ulmer, Stuttgart, DE.
  • Zhong, Y., Jung, S., Pramanik, S. & Beaman, J.H. 1996. Data model and comparison and query methods for interacting classifications in a taxonomic database. Taxon 45: 223241.