*Both authors contributed similarly to the article.
Reproducibility of species lists, visual cover estimates and frequency methods for recording high-mountain vegetation
Article first published online: 26 AUG 2010
© 2010 International Association for Vegetation Science
Journal of Vegetation Science
Volume 21, Issue 6, pages 1035–1047, December 2010
How to Cite
Vittoz, P., Bayfield, N., Brooker, R., Elston, D. A., Duff, E. I., Theurillat, J.-P. and Guisan, A. (2010), Reproducibility of species lists, visual cover estimates and frequency methods for recording high-mountain vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science, 21: 1035–1047. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01216.x
Vittoz, P. (corresponding author, firstname.lastname@example.org) & Guisan, A. (Antoine.Guisan@unil.ch): Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. Bayfield, N. (email@example.com): Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Banchory, UK. Brooker, R. (firstname.lastname@example.org). Elston, D.A. (email@example.com) & Duff, E.I. (firstname.lastname@example.org): Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, UK. Theurillat, J.-P. (Jean-Paul.Theurillat@unige.ch): Centre alpien de phytogéographie, Fondation J.-M. Aubert, CH-1938 Champex-Lac, Switzerland. Theurillat, J.-P.: Section of Biology, University of Geneva, Case postale 60, CH-1292 Chambésy, Switzerland. Present address: Bayfield, N. & Brooker, R. Celtic Environment, Burnside of Ennets, Tornaveen, Banchory, UK.
Co-ordinating Editor: Otto Wildi.
- Issue published online: 26 OCT 2010
- Article first published online: 26 AUG 2010
- Received 20 January 2009;, Accepted 23 July 2010.
- Biodiversity monitoring;
- Observer bias;
- Permanent plot;
- Sampling error;
- Statistical power
Question: When multiple observers record the same spatial units of alpine vegetation, how much variation is there in the records and what are the consequences of this variation for monitoring schemes to detect changes?
Location: One test summit in Switzerland (Alps) and one test summit in Scotland (Cairngorm Mountains).
Method: Eight observers used the GLORIA protocols for species composition and visual cover estimates in percentages on large summit sections (>100 m2) and species composition and frequency in nested quadrats (1 m2).
Results: The multiple records from the same spatial unit for species composition and species cover showed considerable variation in the two countries. Estimates of pseudo-turnover of composition and coefficients of variation of cover estimates for vascular plant species in 1 m × 1-m quadrats showed less variation than in previously published reports, whereas our results in larger sections were broadly in line with previous reports. In Scotland, estimates for bryophytes and lichens were more variable than for vascular plants.
Conclusions: Statistical power calculations indicated that unless large numbers of plots were used, changes in cover or frequency were only likely to be detected for abundant species (exceeding 10% cover) or if relative changes were large (50% or more). Lower variation could be reached with the point method and with larger numbers of small plots. However, as summits often strongly differ from each other, supplementary summits cannot be considered as a way of increasing statistical power without introducing a supplementary component of variance into the analysis and hence into the power calculations.