Cavard, X. (corresponding author, email@example.com) & Bergeron, Y. (firstname.lastname@example.org): NSERC-UQAT-UQAM Industrial Chair in Sustainable Forest Management, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, 445 Boulevard de l'Université, Rouyn-Noranda, Québec, Canada J9X 4E5 Chen, H.Y.H. (email@example.com): Faculty of Forestry and the Forest Environment, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada P7B 5E1 Paré, D. (David.Pare@RNCan-NRCan.gc.ca): Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 1055 Rue du P.E.P.S., P.O. Box 10380, Stn. Sainte-Foy, Québec, Québec, Canada G1V 4C7.
Effect of forest canopy composition on soil nutrients and dynamics of the understorey: mixed canopies serve neither vascular nor bryophyte strata
Article first published online: 28 JUN 2011
© 2011 International Association for Vegetation Science
Journal of Vegetation Science
Volume 22, Issue 6, pages 1105–1119, December 2011
How to Cite
Cavard, X., Bergeron, Y., Chen, H. Y.H. and Paré, D. (2011), Effect of forest canopy composition on soil nutrients and dynamics of the understorey: mixed canopies serve neither vascular nor bryophyte strata. Journal of Vegetation Science, 22: 1105–1119. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01311.x
Co-ordinating Editor: Andreas Prinzing
- Issue published online: 5 OCT 2011
- Article first published online: 28 JUN 2011
- Nomenclature Marie-Victorin et al. (2002) Received 2 November 2010, Received 31 March 2010, Accepted 18 May 2011
- Allometric relationships;
- Carbon dynamics;
- Mixed wood;
- Resource availability;
- Understorey productivity
Question: The effect of overstorey composition on above-ground dynamics of understorey vegetation is poorly understood. This study examines the understorey biomass, production and turnover rates of vascular and non-vascular plants along a conifer–broadleaf gradient of resource availability and heterogeneity.
Location: Canadian boreal forests of northwest Quebec and Ontario.
Methods: We sampled mature stands containing various proportions of black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) BSP), trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.). Above-ground biomass of the understorey vegetation was assessed through harvesting; annual growth rates were calculated as the differences between biomass in 2007 and 2008, as estimated by allometric relationships, and turnover rates were estimated as net primary production divided by the biomass in 2007.
Results: Higher aspen presence, linked to greater nutrient availability in the forest floor, was generally associated with higher vascular biomass and production in the understorey. This effect was less pronounced in sites of high intrinsic fertility. In contrast, bryophyte biomass was positively associated with conifer abundance, particularly in wet sites of the Quebec study area. Non-linear responses resulted in total understorey biomass being lower under mixed canopies than under pure aspen or pure conifer canopies. Turnover rates did not differ with overstorey composition.
Conclusions: While resource availability is a main driver of understorey productivity, resources as drivers appear to differ with differences in understorey strata components, i.e. vascular versus non-vascular plants. Resource heterogeneity induced by a mixed canopy had overall negative effects on understorey above-ground productivity, as this productivity seemed to rely on species adapted to the specific conditions induced by a pure canopy.