SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackerly, D.D., Knight, C.A., Weiss, S.B., Barton, K. & Starmer, K.P. 2002. Leaf size, specific leaf area and microhabitat distribution of chaparral woody plants: contrasting patterns in species level and community level analyses. Oecologia 130: 449457.
  • de Bello, F., Leps, J., Lavorel, S. & Moretti, M. 2007. Importance of species abundance for assessment of trait composition: an example based on pollinator communities. Community Ecology 8: 163170.
  • Bernhardt-Römermann, M., Römermann, C., Nuske, R., Parth, A., Klotz, S., Schmidt, W. & Stadler, J. 2008. On the identification of the most suitable traits for plant functional trait analyses. Oikos 117: 15331541.
  • Bonada, N., Dolédec, S. & Statzner, B. 2007. Taxonomic and biological trait differences of stream macroinvertebrate communities between mediterranean and temperate regions: implications for future climatic scenarios. Global Change Biology 13: 16581671.
  • ter Braak, C.J.F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 11671179.
  • Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A. & Stone, C.J. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY, US.
  • Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, NY, US.
  • Choler, P. 2005. Consistent shifts in Alpine plant traits along a mesotopographical gradient. Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research 37: 444453.
  • Cingolani, A.M., Cabido, M., Gurvich, D.E., Renison, D. & Diaz, S. 2007. Filtering processes in the assembly of plant communities: are species presence and abundance driven by the same traits? Journal of Vegetation Science 18: 911920.
  • Crutsinger, G.M., Souza, L. & Sanders, N.J. 2007. Intraspecific diversity and dominant genotypes resist plant invasions. Ecology Letters 11: 1623.
  • De'Ath, G. 2002. Multivariate regression trees: a new technique for modeling species–environment relationships. Ecology 83: 11051117.
  • Dolédec, S., Chessel, D., ter Braak, C.J.F. & Champely, S. 1996. Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 3: 143166.
  • Dolédec, S., Chessel, D. & Gimaret-Carpentier, C. 2000. Niche separation in community analysis: a new method. Ecology 81: 29142927.
  • Dolédec, S., Lamouroux, N., Fuchs, U. & Mérigoux, S. 2007. Modelling the hydraulic preferences of benthic macroinvertebrates in small European streams. Freshwater Biology 52: 145164.
  • Dray, S. & Legendre, P. 2008. Testing the species traits–environment relationships: the fourth-corner problem revisited. Ecology 89: 34003412.
  • Dray, S., Chessel, D. & Thioulouse, J. 2003. Co-inertia analysis and the linking of ecological data tables. Ecology 84: 30783089.
  • Everitt, B.S., Landau, S., Leese, M. & Stahl, D. 2011. Cluster analysis, 5th edn. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
  • Fox, B.J. & Brown, J.H. 1993. Assembly rules for functional groups in North American desert rodent communities. Oikos 67: 358370.
  • Garnier, E., Lavorel, S., Ansquer, P., Castro, H., Cruz, P., Dolezal, J., Eriksson, O., Fortunel, C., Freitas, H., Golodets, C., Grigulis, K., Jouany, C., Kazakou, E., Kigel, J., Kleyer, M., Lehsten, V., Leps, J., Meier, T., Pakeman, R., Papadimitriou, M., Papanastasis, V.P., Quested, H., Quetier, F., Robson, M., Roumet, C., Rusch, G., Skarpe, C., Sternberg, M., Theau, J.P., Thebault, A., Vile, D. & Zarovali, M.P. 2007. Assessing the effects of land-use change on plant traits, communities and ecosystem functioning in grasslands: a standardized methodology and lessons from an application to 11 European sites. Annals of Botany 99: 967985.
  • Gordon, A.D. 1999. Classification, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, FL, US.
  • Grime, J.P. 2006. Trait convergence and trait divergence in herbaceous plant communities: mechanisms and consequences. Journal of Vegetation Science 17: 255260.
  • Grime, J.P., Hodgson, J.G. & Hunt, R. 1988. Comparative plant ecology. Unwin-Hyman, London, UK.
  • Grime, J.P., Thompson, K., Hunt, R., Hodgson, J.G., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Rorison, I.H., Hendry, G.A.F., Ashenden, T.W., Askew, A.P., Band, S.R., Booth, R.E., Bossard, C.C., Campbell, B.D., Cooper, J.E.L., Davison, A.W., Gupta, P.L., Hall, W., Hand, D.W., Hannah, M.A., Hillier, S.H., Hodkinson, D.J., Jalili, A., Liu, Z., Mackey, J.L., Matthews, N, Mowforth, M.A., Neal, A.M., Reader, R.J., Reiling, K., Ross-Fraser, A.M., Spencer, R.E., Sutton, F., Tasker, D.E., Thorpe, P.C. & Whitehouse, J. 1997. Integrated screening validates a primary axis of specialisation in plants. Oikos 79: 259281.
  • Hérault, B. & Honnay, O. 2005. The relative importance of local, regional and historical factors determining the distribution of plants in fragmented riverine forests: an emergent group approach. Journal of Biogeography 32: 20692081.
  • Hood, R. R., Laws, E.A., Armstrong, R.A., Bates, N.R., Brown, C.W., Carlson, C.A., Chai, F., Doney, S.C., Falkowski, P.G., Feely, R.A., Friedrichs, M.A.M., Landry, M.R., Moore, J.K., Nelson, D.M., Richardson, T.L., Salihoglu, B., Schartau, M., Toole, D.A. & Wiggert, J. D. 2006. Pelagic functional group modeling: progress, challenges and prospects. Deep-Sea Research Part II-Topical Studies in Oceanography 53: 459512.
  • Jäger, E.J. & Werner, K. 2002. Exkursionsflora von Deutschland, Vol. 4, 9th edn. Spektrum, Berlin, DE.
  • Kearney, M. & Porter, W. 2009. Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species’ ranges. Ecology Letters 12: 334350.
  • Körner, C. 2003. Alpine plant life: functional plant ecology of high mountain ecosystems, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, DE.
  • Kühner, A. & Kleyer, M. 2008. A parsimonious combination of functional traits predicting plant response to disturbance and soil fertility. Journal of Vegetation Science 19: 681642.
  • Lavorel, S. & Garnier, E. 2002. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology 16: 545556.
  • Lavorel, S., McIntyre, S., Landsberg, J. & Forbes, T.D.A. 1997. Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12: 474478.
  • Lavorel, S., Rochette, C. & Lebreton, J. 1999. Functional groups for response to disturbance in Mediterranean old fields. Oikos 84: 480498.
  • Lavorel, S., Díaz, S., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Garnier, E., Harriso, S.P., McIntyr, S., Pausas, J.G., Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Roume, C. & Urcelay, C. 2007. Plant functional types: are we getting any closer to the holy grail? In: Canadell, J.G, Pataki, D. & Pitelk, L. (eds.) Terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world. pp. 149160. The IGBP Series, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, DE.
  • Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. 1998. Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL.
  • Legendre, P., Galzin, R. & HarmelinVivien, M.L. 1997. Relating behavior to habitat: solutions to the fourth-corner problem. Ecology 78: 547562.
  • Lehsten, V., Harmand, P. & Kleyer, M. 2009. Fourth Corner Generation of Plant Functional Response Groups. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 16: 561584.
  • Leishman, M.R., Westoby, M. & Jurado, E. 1995. Correlates of seed size variation: a comparison among five temperate floras. Journal of Ecology 83: 517530.
  • Lord, J., Westoby, M. & Leishman, M. 1995. Seed size and phylogeny in 6 temperate floras – constraints, niche conservatism, and adaptation. American Naturalist 146: 349364.
  • Louault, F., Pillard, V D., Aufrère, J., Garnier, E. & Soussana, J.-F. 2005. Plant traits and functional types in response to reduced disturbance in a semi-natural grassland. Journal of Vegetation Science, 16: 151160.
  • McGill, B.J., Enquist, B.J., Weiher, E. & Westoby, M. 2006. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 178185.
  • McIntyre, S. & Lavorel, S. 2001. Livestock grazing in subtropical pastures: steps in the analysis of attribute response and plant functional types. Journal of Ecology 89: 209226.
  • McIntyre, S., Lavorel, S., Landsberg, J. & Forbes, T.D.A. 1999. Disturbance response in vegetation – towards a global perspective on functional traits. Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 621630.
  • Moles, A.T., Falster, D.S., Leishman, M.R. & Westoby, M. 2004. Small-seeded species produce more seeds per square metre of canopy per year, but not per individual per lifetime. Journal of Ecology 92: 384396.
  • Moretti, M., de Bello, F., Roberts, S.P.M. & Potts, S.G. 2009. Taxonomical vs. functional responses of bee communities to fire in two contrasting climatic regions. Journal of Animal Ecology 78: 98108.
  • Nygaard, B. & Ejrnaes, R. 2004. A new approach to functional interpretation of vegetation data. Journal of Vegetation Science 15: 4956.
  • Pakeman, R.J. 2004. Consistency of plant species and trait responses to grazing along a productivity gradient: a multi-site analysis. Journal of Ecology 92: 893905.
  • Pillar, V. D. & Duarte, L. D. 2010. A framework for metacommunity analysis of phylogenetic structure. Ecology Letters 13: 587596.
  • Pillar, V.D. & Sosinski, E.E. Jr 2003. An improved method for searching plant functional types by numerical analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 232332.
  • Pillar, V. D., Duarte, L. D., Sosinski, E. E. & Joner, F. 2009. Discriminating trait-convergence and trait-divergence assembly patterns in ecological community gradients. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 334348.
  • Quetier, F., Thebault, A. & Lavorel, S. 2007. Plant traits in a state and transition framework as markers of ecosystem response to land-use change. Ecological Monographs 77: 3352.
  • Rao, C.R. 1964. The use and interpretation of principal correspondence analysis in applied research. Sankhya A 26: 329359.
  • Rosenfeld, J.S. 2002. Functional redundancy in ecology and conservation. Oikos 98: 156162.
  • Suding, K.N., Lavorel, S., Chapin, F.S., Cornelissen, J.H.C., Diaz, S., Garnier, E., Goldberg, D., Hooper, D.U., Jackson, S.T. & Navas, M.L. 2008. Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. Global Change Biology 14: 11251140.
  • Thuiller, W., Lavorel, S., Midgley, G., Lavergne, S. & Rebelo, T. 2004. Relating plant traits and species distributions along bioclimatic gradients for 88 Leucadendron taxa. Ecology 85: 16881699.
  • Thuiller, W., Richardson, D.M., Rouget, M., Procheş, Ş. & Wilson, J.R.U. 2006. Interactions between environment, species traits, and human uses describe patterns of plant invasions. Ecology 87: 17551769.
  • Violle, C., Navas, M.L., Vile, D., Kazakou, E., Fortunel, C., Hummel, I. & Garnier, E. 2007. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116: 882892.
  • Westoby, M., Leishman, M. & Lord, J. 1995. Issues of interpretation after relating comparative datasets to phylogeny. Journal of Ecology 83: 892893.
  • Westoby, M., Falster, D.S., Moles, A.T., Vesk, P.A. & Wright, I.J. 2002. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 125159.
  • Whitlock, R., Grime, J.P., Booth, R. & T. Burke, T. 2007. The role of genotypic diversity in determining grassland community structure under constant environmental conditions. Journal of Ecology 95: 895907.
  • Wilson, J.B. 1999. Guilds, functional types and ecological groups. Oikos 86: 507522.
  • Woodward, F.I. & Cramer, W. 1996. Plant functional types and climatic changes: introduction. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 306308.
  • Woodward, F.I. & Diament, A.D. 1991. Functional approaches to predicting the ecological effects of global change. Functional Ecology 5: 202212.