SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson, C. and M. Singer (2008). The sensitive left and the impervious right. Multilevel models and the politics of inequality, ideology, and legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies 41: 564599.
  • Anderson, C. J. and Y. V. Tverdova (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 9199.
  • Augoustinos, M., I. Walker and N. Donaghue. (2006). Social cognition: An integrated introduction (2nd edition). London: Sage.
  • Bennett, S. (2006). Democratic competence, before Converse and after. Critical Review 18: 105142.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1984[1979]). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (Nice, R. Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. and L. Boltanski. (2008[1976]). La production de l’idéologie dominante. Paris: Demopolis/Raison d’agir.
  • Brunner, M. and P. Sciarini. (2002). L’opposition ouverture-traditions. In Hug, S. and P.Sciarini ed. Nouvelles valeurs et nouveaux clivages politiques en Suisse. Paris: L’Harmattan (2993).
  • Brunner, M. and L. Sgier. (1997). Crise de confiance dans les institutions politiques suisses? Quelques résultats d’une enquête d’opinion. Swiss Political Science Review 3 (1): 19.
  • Cantril, A. and S. Cantril. (1999). Reading mixed signals. Ambivalence in American public opinion about government. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
  • Castel, R. (1995). Les métamorphoses de la question sociale. Une chronique du salariat. Paris: Fayard.
  • Catterberg, G. and A. Moreno. (2005). The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18 (1): 3148.
  • Citrin, J. (1974). Comment: The political relevance of trust in government. The American Political Science Review 68 (3): 973988.
  • Citrin, J. and C. Muste. (1999). Trust in government. In Robinson, J., P.Shaver and L.Wrightsman ed. Measures of political attitudes. London: Academic Press (465532).
  • Clémence, A. (2001). Social positioning and social representations. In Deaux, K. and G.Philogène ed. Representations of the social. Oxford: Blackwell (8395).
  • Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D. E. ed. Ideology and discontent. London: Free Press of Glencoe (206261).
  • Cook, T. and P. Gronke. (2005). The sceptical American: Revisiting the meanings of trust in government and confidence in institutions. The Journal of Politics 67: 784803.
  • Cooksey, R. and G. Soutar. (2006). Coefficient Beta and hierarchical item clustering. An analytical procedure for establishing and displaying the dimensionality and homogeneity of summated scales. Organizational Research methods 9 (1): 7898.
  • Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation. Political Studies 56: 7698.
  • Delli Carpini, M. X. and S. Keeter. (1993). Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 11791206.
  • Devos, T., D. Spini and S. Schwartz. (2002). Conflicts among human values and trust in institutions. British Journal of Social Psychology 41: 481494.
  • Doise, W. (2005). Les représentations sociales. In Dubois, N. (ed.), Psychologie sociale de la cognition. Paris: Dunod (151207).
  • Doise, W., A. Clémence and F. Lorenzi-Cioldi. (1993). The quantitative analysis of social representations. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  • Easton, D. (1975). A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support. British Journal of Political Science 5 (4): 435457.
  • Elcheroth, G., W. Doise and S. Reicher. (in press). On the knowledge of politics and the politics of knowledge: How a social representations approach helps us rethink the subject of political psychology. Political Psychology.
  • Emler, N. and S. Reicher. (1995). Adolescent delinquency: The collective management of reputation. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Emler, N. and S. Reicher. (2005). Delinquency: cause or consequence of social exclusion? In Abrams, D., J.Marques and M.Hogg ed. The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion. Philadelphia: Psychology Press (211241).
  • Feygina, I. and T. R. Tyler. (2009). Procedural Justice and System-Justifying Motivations. In Jost, J. T., A. C.Kay and H.Thorisdottir ed. Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification. New York: Oxford University Press (351370).
  • Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago: University of Chicago.
  • Gaxie, D. (1978). Le cens caché. Inégalités culturelles et ségrégation politique. Paris: Seuil.
  • Grönlund, K. and M. Setälä. (2007). Political Trust, Satisfaction and Voter Turnout. Comparative European Politics 5 (4): 400422.
  • Hardin, R. (1993). The street-level epistemology of trust. Politics and Society 21: 505529.
  • Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. The American Political Science Review 92 (4): 791808.
  • Hibbing, J. R. and E. Theiss-Morse. (2001). What is it about government that Americans dislike? New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Iacobucci, D. (2008). Mediation analysis. Series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. London: Sage.
  • Kay, A. C., J. T. Jost and S. Young. (2005). Victim derogation and victim enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science 16: 240246.
    Direct Link:
  • Kelleher, C. A. and J. Woldak. (2007). Explaining public confidence in the branches of state government. Political Research Quarterly 60 (4): 707721.
  • Lalive d’Epinay, C. and C. Garcia. (1988). Le mythe du travail en Suisse. Splendeur et déclin au cours du XXe siècle. Geneva: Georg.
  • Leuthold, H., M. Hermann and S. I. Fabrikant. (2007). Making the political landscape visible: mapping and analyzing voting patterns in an ideological space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34: 785807.
  • Lewicki, R., D. McAllister and R. Bies. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review 23: 438458.
  • Lipset, S. and W. Schneider. (1987). The confidence gap. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (2002). Les représentations des groupes dominants et dominés: Collections et agrégats. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires.
  • Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Luhmann, N (2000). Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives. In Gambetta, D. ed. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, electronic edition, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, chapter 6 (94107).
  • Mackinnon, D. P., A. J. Fairchild and M. S. Fritz. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology 58: 593614.
  • Mishler, W. and R. Rose. (1997). Trust, distrust and skepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies. The Journal of Politics 59: 418451.
  • Mishler, W. and R. Rose. (2001). What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies Comparative Political Studies 34 (1): 3062.
  • Moscovici, S. (2000). Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Moscovici, S (2008 [1961]). Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Revelle, W. (1979). Hierarchical cluster analysis and the internal structure of tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research 14: 5774.
  • Staerklé, C. (2009). Policy attitudes, ideological values and social representations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 3: 10961112.
  • Staerklé, C., A. Clémence and D. Spini. (in press). Social representations: A normative and dynamic intergroup approach. Political Psychology.
  • Staerklé, C., C. Delay, L. Gianettoni and P. Roux. (2007). Qui a droit à quoi? Représentations et légitimation de l’ordre social. Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
  • Sidanius, J. and F. Pratto. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tyler, T. (2001). A psychological perspective on the legitimacy of institutions and authorities. In Jost, J. and B.Major ed. The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press (416436).
  • Van der Waal, J., P. Achterberg and D. Houtman. (2007). Class is not dead - it has been buried alive: Class voting and cultural voting in postwar Western societies (1956–1990). World Political Science Review 3: 127.
  • Van Zomeren, M., T. Postmes and R. Spears. (2008). Toward an integrative Social Identity Model of Collective Action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin 134: 504535.
  • Wagner, W. and N. Hayes. (2005). Everyday discourse and common sense. The theory of social representations. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Young, J. (1999). The Exclusive Society: Social Exclusion, Crime and Difference in Late Modernity. London: Sage.
  • Zinbarg, R., W. Revelle, I. Yovel and W. Li. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ωh: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika 70: 123133.