SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bachrach, P. and M. S. Baratz (1970). Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Banchoff, T. (2005). Path dependence and value-driven issues. The comparative politics of stem cell research. World Politics 57: 200230.
  • Baumgartner, F. R. et B. D. Jones (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Baumgartner, F. R. et B. D. Jones (2002). Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Baumgartner, F. R., S. De Boef and A. E. Boydstun (2008). The Decline of Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cobb, R.W. and C.D. Elder (1983). Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building. Baltimore: John-Hopkins University Press.
  • Dery, D. (1984). Problem Definition in Policy Analysis. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
  • Engeli, I. (2009). The Challenges of Abortion and ART Policies in Europe. Comparative European Politics 7(1): 5674.
  • Engeli, I. (2010). Controverses, Décisions, et Politiques de la Reproduction. Paris: L’Harmattan.
  • Engeli, I. (forthcoming). Policy Struggle on Reproduction: Doctors, Women, and Christians. Political Research Quarterly.
  • Engeli, I. and S. Häusermann (2009). Government Strategies for Successful Reforms in Controversial Policy Fields (EUI working Paper, 2009/1). Fiesole: European University Institute.
  • Fink, S. (2008). Politics as Usual or Bringing Religion Back In? Comparative Political Studies 41(12): 16311656.
  • Flückiger, A. (2010). Promouvoir le don d’organes par des campagnes d’information pour mieux respecter le droit à la vie des receveurs. In Flückiger, A. ed. Emouvoir et persuader pour promouvoir le don d’organes? Genève: Schulthess (121150).
  • Gottweis, H. (2002). Stem Cell Policies in the United States and in Germany: Between Bioethics and Regulation. Policy Studies Journal 30:444469.
  • Haider-Markel, D. P. and K. J. Meier (1996). The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of Conflict. The Journal of Politics 58(2): 332249.
  • Häusermann, S. (2010). The Politics of Welfare Reform in Continental Europe. Modernization in Hard Times. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hilgartner, S. and C. L. Bosk (1988). The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model. The American Journal of Sociology 94(1): 5378.
  • Hisschemöller, M. and R. Hoppe (1995). Coping with Intractable Controversies: The Case for Problem Structuring in Policy Design and Analysis. Knowledge and Policy 8(4): 4060.
  • Ingold, K. and F. Varone (forthcoming). Treating Policy Brokers Seriously: Evidence from the Climate Policy, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
  • Knoepfel, P., C. Larrue, F. Varone and M. Hill (2007). Public Policy Analysis. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  • Meier, K. J. (1994). The Politics of Sin: Drugs, Alcohol and Public Policy. Armonk: Sharpe.
  • Mooney, C. Z. (1999). The Politics of Morality Policy. Policy Studies Journal 27(4): 675680.
  • Mooney, C. Z. (2001). The Public Clash of Private Values. New-York: Chatham House.
  • Mooney, C. Z. and M.-H. Lee (1995). Legislative Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform. American Journal of Political Science 39(3): 599627.
  • Mooney, C. Z. and M.H. Lee (2000). The Influence of Values on Consensus and Contentious Morality Policy: U.S. Death Penalty Reform, 1956-82. The Journal of Politics 62(1): 223239.
  • Mooney, C.Z. et R. G. Schuldt (2008). Does Morality Policy Exist? Policy Studies Journal 36(2): 199218.
  • Pierce, P. A. and D. E. Miller (1999). Variations in the Diffusion of State Lottery Adoptions: How Revenue Dedication Changes Morality Politics, Policy Studies Journal 27(4): 696706.
  • Horning Priest, S. (1994). Structuring Public Debate on Biotechnology. Media Frames and Public Response. Science Communication 16(2): 166179.
  • Rochefort, D. A. and R. W. Cobb (1993). Problem Definition, Agenda Access, and Policy Choice, Policy Studies Journal 21(1): 5671.
  • Rothmayr, C. (1999). Politik vor Gericht. Bern: Haupt.
  • Rothmayr, C. (2003). Regulatory Approaches to Biomedicine: The Impact of Self-Regulation on the Public Policies for Assisted Reproductive Technology. In Serdült, U. and T. Widmer Hrsg. Politik im Fokus. Zürich: NZZ Verlag (425445).
  • Rothmayr, C. (2007). Switzerland: Direct Democracy and Non-EU Membership – Different Institutions, Similar Policies. In Monpetit, E., C. Rothmayr and F. Varone ed. The Politics of Biotechnology in North America and Europe. Lanham: Lexington (237261).
  • Rothmayr, C. and F. Varone (2009). Direct Legislation in North-America and Europe: Promoting or Restricting Biotechnology? Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 11(4): 425449.
  • Schiffino, N., C. Ramjoué and F. Varone (2009). Biomedical Policies in Belgium and Italy: From Regulatory Reluctance to Policy Changes, West European Politics 32(3): 559585.
  • Schneider, A. L. and H.M. Ingram (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
  • Studlar, D. T. (2001). What Constitutes Morality Policy? A Cross-National Analysis. In Mooney, C. Z. ed. The Public Clash of Private Values. New-York: Chatham House (3751).
  • Tatalovich, R. and B. W. Daynes eds (1988). Social Regulatory Policymaking – Moral Controversies in American Politics. Boulder: Westview.
  • Tribe, L. H. (1990). Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. New York: Norton.
  • Varone, F., C. Rothmayr and E. Montpetit (2006). Regulating Biomedicine in Europe and North America. A Qualitative-Comparative Analysis. European Journal of Political Research 45(2): 317343.
  • Varone, F. and N. Schiffino (2004). Regulating Biotechnologies in Belgium. Diverging Designs for ART and GMOs. Archives of Public Health, 62: 83106.