SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Andersen, A. G. et al. 2000. “High frequency of sub-optimal semen quality in an unselected population of young men,” Human Reproduction 15(2): 366372.
  • Billari, F. C., H.-P. Kohler, G. Andersson, and H. Lundström. 2007. “Approaching the limit: Long-term trends in late and very late fertility,” Population and Development Review 33(1): 149170.
  • Cahill, D. J., J. Meadowcroft, V. A. Akande, and E. Corrigan. 2005. “Likelihood of natural conception following treatment by IVF,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 22(11/12): 401405.
  • CDC. 2006. “Assisted reproductive technology success rates 2004,” US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta «http://www.cdc.gov/ART/ART2004/download.htm»
  • Council of Europe. 2006. Recent Demographic Developments in Europe 2005 Strasbourg : Council of Europe Publishing.
  • ESHRE. 2005. “Fertility and ageing,” Human Reproduction Update 11(3): 261276.
  • Eurostat. 2007. Online database of Eurostat, Theme 3: Population and Social Conditions «http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu». Last accessed in February 2007.
  • Evers, J. L. H., H. W. De Haas, J. A. Land, J. C. M. Dumoulin, and G. A. J. Dunselman. 1998. “Treatment-independent pregnancy rate in patients with severe reproductive disorders,” Human Reproduction 13: 12061209.
  • Frejka, T. and J.-P. Sardon. 2004. Childbearing Prospects in Low-Fertility Countries: A Cohort Analysis, European Studies of Population, Vol. 13, Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Grant, J., S. Hoorens, F. Gallo, and J. Cave. 2006. “Should ART be part of a population policy mix? A preliminary assessment of the demographic and economic impact of assisted reproductive technologies,” RAND Europe Documented Briefings «http://www.rand.org/pubs/documented_briefings/2006/RAND_DB507.pdf.
  • Habbema, J. D. F., M. J. C. Eijkemans, G. Nargrund, G. Beets, and E. Te Velde 2007. “Can in vitro fertilization help to reverse the trend of declining birth rates and population ageing in Europe?,” paper presented at VID conference “Can policies enhance fertility in Europe?,” Vienna Institute of Demography, Vienna, 6-7 December.
  • Hoorens, S., F. Gallo, J. A. K. Cave, and J. C. Grant. 2007. “Can assisted reproductive technologies help to offset population ageing? An assessment of the demographic and economic impact of ART in Denmark and UK,” Human Reproduction 22(9): 24712475.
  • Ingerslev, H. J. et al. 2005. “Should one or two embryos be transferred in IVF? A health technology assessment,” Danish Health Technology Assessment 7 (2).
  • Jensen, T. K. et al. 2008. “Declining trends in conception rates in recent birth cohorts of native Danish women: A possible role of deteriorating male reproductive health,” forthcoming in International Journal of Andrology..
  • Jørgensen, N., C. Asklund, E. Carlsen, and N. E. Skakkebæk. 2006. “Coordinated European investigations of semen quality: Results from studies of Scandinavian young men is a matter of concern,” International Journal of Andrology 29: 5461.
  • Katz, P., R. Nachtigall, and J. Showstack. 2002. “The economic impact of the assisted reproductive technologies,” Nature Cell Biology 4(S1): S29S32 and Nature Medicine 8 (S1): S29-S32 «http://www.nature.com/fertility/content/pdf/ncb-nm-fertilitys29.pdf.
  • Kohler, H.-P. and J. A. Ortega. 2002. “Tempo-adjusted period parity progression measures, fertility postponement and completed cohort fertility,” Demographic Research 6: 92144 «www.demographic-research.org.
  • Kohler, H.-P. and J. A. Ortega. 2004. “Old insights and new approaches: Fertility analysis and tempo adjustment in the age-parity model,” Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2004: 5789.
  • Kohler, H.-P. and D. Philipov. 2001. “Variance effects in the Bongaarts-Feeney formula,” Demography 38 (1): 116.
  • Land, J. A. and J. L. H. Evers. 2003. “Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: Report of an ESHRE consensus meeting,” Human Reproduction 18(2): 455457.
  • Leridon, H. 2004. “Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment,” Human Reproduction 19(7): 15491554.
  • Leridon, H. 2005. “A new estimate of permanent sterility by age: Sterility defined as the inability to conceive,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Philadelphia, 31 March-2 April.
  • Morgan, S. P., S. Shanahan, and W. Welsh. 2005. “Brave new worlds: Philosophy, politics, and science in human biotechnology,” Population and Development Review 31(1): 127144.
  • Murphy, T. F. 2007. “Access and equity: International standards and assisted reproductive technologies,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 14 (Supp. 1, 2007): 1218.
  • Nyboe Andersen, A. et al. 2007. “Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2003: Results generated from European registers by ESHRE,” Human Reproduction 22(6): 15131525.
  • Nyboe Andersen, A. and K. Erb. 2006. “Register data on assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Europe including a detailed description of ART in Denmark,” International Journal of Andrology 29(1):1216.
  • Olsen, J., M. Küppers-Chinow, and A. Spinelli. 1996. “Seeking medical help for subfecundity: A study based upon surveys in five European countries,” Fertility and Sterility 66(1): 95100.
  • Osmanagaoglu, K. et al. 2002. “Spontaneous pregnancies in couples who discontinued intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection treatment: A 5-year follow-up study,” Fertility and Sterility 78(3): 550556.
  • Pinborg A. 2005. “IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: Risks and prevention,” Human Reproduction Update 11: 575593.
  • Pinborg, A., A. Nyboe Andersen, and L. Schmidt. 2007. “Crude 5-year follow-up on delivery and adoption rates among 1338 new couples treated with ART,” paper presented at the 23rd annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Lyon, 1-4 July.
  • Powell, K. 2004. “Age is no barrier,” Nature 432, 4 (November): 430–432.
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2007. Special Supplement on “Ethics, law, and moral philosophy of reproductive medicine.” Vol 14. Supp. 1 «www.rbmonline.com.
  • Reynolds, M. A., L. A. Schieve, J. A. Martin, G. Jeng, and M. Macaluso. 2003. “Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997-2000,” Pediatrics 111(5): 11591162.
  • Schmidt, L. 2006. “Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark: Epidemiology and psy-chosocial consequences,” Danish Medical Bulletin 53: 390417.
  • Sobotka, T., H.-P. Kohler, and F. C. Billari. 2007. “The increase in late childbearing in Europe, Japan and the United States,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, New York, 29-31 March.
  • SST. 2007. IVF-Behandlinger i Danmark. [IVF treatments in Denmark]. National Board of Health (Sunhedsstyrelsen, SST), Copenhagen «http://www.sst.dk/publ/tidsskrifter/nyetal/pdf/2007/14_07.pdf.
  • Statistics Denmark. 2007. Data on births and deliveries downloaded from an online database StatBank Denmark http://www.statbank.dk].
  • Stephen, E. H. 2000. “Demographic implications of assisted reproductive technologies,” Population Research and Policy Review 19(4): 301315.
  • Sunde, A. 2007. “Europe's declining population and the contribution of ART,” Pharmaceuticals Policy and Law 9: 7989.
  • Testa, M. R. 2007. “Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: Evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006 survey,” Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2007: 357379.
  • Thaele, M. and M Uszkoreit. 2007. “Legislature's impact on the outcome of infertility treatments—The German political contradiction,” Pharmaceuticals Policy and Law 9: 221227.
  • Van Wely, M., M. Twisk, B. W. Mol, and F. Van Der Veen 2006. “Is twin pregnancy necessarily an adverse outcome of assisted reproductive technologies?,” Human Reproduction 21(11): 27362738.