1. Top of page
  2. Abstract

During the past two decades, estimates of unmet need have become an influential measure for assessing population policies and programs. This article recounts the evolution of the concept of unmet need, describes how demographic survey data have been used to generate estimates of its prevalence, and tests the sensitivity of these estimates to various assumptions in the unmet need algorithm. The algorithm uses a complex set of assumptions to identify women: who are sexually active, who are infecund, whose most recent pregnancy was unwanted, who wish to postpone their next birth, and who are postpartum amenorrheic. The sensitivity tests suggest that defensible alternative criteria for identifying four out of five of these subgroups of women would increase the estimated prevalence of unmet need. The exception is identification of married women who are sexually active; more accurate measurement of this subgroup would reduce the estimated prevalence of unmet need in most settings.



  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  • Anderson, John E. and Leo Morris. 1981. “Fertility differences and the need for family planning services in five Latin American countries,” International Family Planning Perspectives 7(1): 1621.
  • Berelson, Bernard. 1969. “Family-planning programs and population control,” in Bernard Berelson (ed.), Family-Planning Programs: An International Survey. New York: Basic Books, pp. 291303.
  • Bogue, Donald J. 1974. “Population perspectives: Some views from a sociologist,” Population Dynamics Quarterly 2(2): 220.
  • Bongaarts, John, John Cleland, John Townshend, Jane Bertrand, and Monica das Gupta. 2012. Family Planning Programs for the 21st Century: Rationale and Design. New York: Population Council.
  • Bradley, Sarah E.K., Trevor N. Croft, Joy D. Fishel, and Charles F. Westoff. 2012. Revising Unmet Need for Family Planning. DHS Analytical Studies No. 25. Calverton, MD: ICF International.
  • Casterline, John B. and Laila O. El-Zeini. 2007. “The estimation of unwanted fertility,” Demography 44(4): 729745.
  • Casterline, John B. and Colin Odden. 2014. “Measurement of infecundity for family planning research.” Institute for Population Research, Ohio State University.
  • Casterline, John B. and Steven W. Sinding. 2000. “Unmet need for family planning in developing countries and implications for population policy,” Population and Development Review 26(4): 691723.
  • Cleland, John, Stan Bernstein, Alex Ezeh, Anibal Faundes, Anna Glasier, and Jolene Innis. 2006. “Family planning: The unfinished agenda,” The Lancet 368(9549): 1027.
  • Cleland, John and Iqbal Shah. 2013. “Contraceptive revolution: Focused efforts are still needed,” The Lancet 383(9878): 16041606.
  • Connelly, Matthew. 2006. “Population control in India: Prologue to the Emergency Period,” Population and Development Review 32(4): 629667.
  • Darroch, Jacqueline E. and Susheela Singh. 2012. “Adding it up—Costs and benefits of contraceptive services: Estimates for 2012.” New York: Guttmacher Institute and United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).
  • Darroch, Jacqueline E. and Susheela Singh. 2013. “Trends in contraceptive need and use in developing countries in 2003, 2008, and 2012: An analysis of national surveys,” The Lancet 381(9879): 17561762.
  • Davis, Kingsley. 1967. “Population policy: Will current programs succeed?Science 158(3802): 730739.
  • El-Zeini, Laila O. 1999. “Categorizing the need for family planning: A story of evolution.” Paper presented at the IUSSP Seminar on Social Categories in Population Studies, Cairo, 15–18 September.
  • Freedman, Ronald and Lolagene C. Coombs. 1974. Cross-cultural Comparisons: Data on Two Factors in Fertility Behavior. New York: Population Council.
  • Freedman, Ronald, Lolagene C. Coombs, and Ming Chen Chang. 1972. “Trends in family size preferences and practice of family planning: Taiwan, 1965–1970,” Studies in Family Planning 3(12): 281296.
  • Hauser, Philip N. 1969. “Population: More than family planning,” Journal of Medical Education 44(11, Part 2): 2029.
  • Kelley, Allen C. 1988. “Economic consequences of population change in the Third World,” Journal of Economic Literature 26(4): 16851728.
  • Lightbourne, Robert E. 1985. “Individual preferences and fertility behaviour,” in J. Cleland and J. Hobcraft (eds.), Reproductive Change in Developing Countries: Insights from the World Fertility Survey. Oxford University Press, pp. 165198.
  • Mauldin, W. Parker. 1965. “Fertility studies: Knowledge, attitude, and practice,” Studies in Family Planning 1(7): 110.
  • McCauley, P., Bryant Robey, Ann Blanc, and J. Geller. 1994. Opportunities for Women through Reproductive Choice. Population Reports, Series M, No. 12. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
  • McIntosh, C. Alison and Jason L. Finkle. 1995. “The Cairo Conference on Population and Development: A new paradigm?Population and Development Review 21(2): 223260.
  • MEASURE, DHS. 2013. “Unmet Need for Family Planning.” Accessed 5 March 2013.
  • Morris, Leo, Gary Lewis, Dorian L. Powell, John Anderson, and Ann Way. 1981. Contraceptive Prevalence Surveys: A New Source of Family Planning Data. Population Reports, Series M, No. 5. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
  • Nortman, Dorothy L. 1982. “Measuring the unmet need for contraception to space and limit births,” International Family Planning Perspectives 8(4): 125134.
  • Nortman, Dorothy L. and Gary L. Lewis. 1984. “A time model to measure contraceptive demand,” in J.A. Ross and R. McNamara (eds.), Survey Analysis for the Guidance of Family Planning Programs. Liege, Belgium: Ordina Editions, pp. 3773.
  • Peterson, Herbert B., Gary L Darmstadt, and John Bongaarts. 2013. “Meeting the unmet need for family planning: Now is the time,” The Lancet 381(9879): 16961699.
  • Pritchett Lant, H. 1994. “Desired fertility and the impact of population policies,” Population and Development Review 20(1): 155
  • Robey, Bryant, John A. Ross, and Indu Bhushan. 1996. Meeting Unmet Need: New Strategies. Population Reports, Series J, No. 43. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Population Information Program.
  • Sen, Gita, Adrienne Germain, and Lincoln C. Chen (eds.). 1994. Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment, and Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Sinding, Steven W., John A. Ross, and Allan G. Rosenfield. 1994. “Seeking common ground: Unmet need and demographic goals,” International Family Planning Perspectives 20(1): 2327, 32.
  • Westoff, Charles F. 1978. “The unmet need for birth control in five Asian countries,” Family Planning Perspectives 10(3):17381.
  • Westoff, Charles F. 1988. “The potential demand for family planning: A new measure of unmet need and estimates for five Latin American countries,” International Family Planning Perspectives 14(2): 4553.
  • Westoff, Charles F. 2001. Unmet Need at the End of the Century. DHS Comparative Reports No. 1. Calverton, MD: Macro International.
  • Westoff, Charles F. 2006. New Estimates of Unmet Need and the Demand for Family Planning. DHS Comparative Reports No. 14. Calverton, MD: Macro International.
  • Westoff, Charles F. and Akinrinola Bankole. 1995. Unmet Need: 1990–1994. DHS Comparative Studies No. 16. Calverton, MD: Macro International.
  • Westoff, Charles F. and Akinrinola Bankole. 1996. “The potential demographic significance of unmet need,” International Family Planning Perspectives 22(1): 1620.
  • Westoff, Charles F. and Luis H. Ochoa. 1991. Unmet Need and the Demand for Family Planning. DHS Comparative Studies No. 5. Columbia, MD: Institute for Resource Development.
  • Westoff, Charles F. and Ann R. Pebley. 1981. “Alternative measures of unmet need for family planning in developing countries,” International Family Planning Perspectives 7(4): 126136.
  • World Health Organization (WHO), Johns Hopkins University Center for Communication Programs (JHU/CCP), and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). 2011. “Family planning: A global handbook for providers.” Accessed 20 January 2013.