SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. REFERENCES

Pakistan's high unmet need for contraception and low contraceptive prevalence remain a challenge, especially in light of the country's expected contribution to the FP2020 goal of expanding family planning services to an additional 120 million women with unmet need. Analysis of panel data from 14 Pakistani districts suggests that efforts to reduce unmet need should also focus on empowering women who are currently practicing contraception to achieve their own reproductive intentions through continuation of contraceptive use of any method. Providing women with better quality of care and encouraging method switching would bridge the gap that exists when women are between methods and thus would reduce unwanted births. This finding is generalizable to other countries that, like Pakistan, are highly dependent on short-acting modern and traditional methods. The approach of preventing attrition among current contraceptive users would be at least as effective as persuading nonusers to adopt a method for the first time.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. REFERENCES
  • Ali, Mohamed M., John Cleland, and Iqbal H. Shah. 2012. “Causes and consequences of contraceptive discontinuation: Evidence from 60 Demographic and Health Surveys.” Egypt: World Health Organization.
  • Blanc, Ann K., Siǎn L. Curtis, and Trevor N. Croft. 2002. “Monitoring contraceptive continuation: Links to fertility outcomes and quality of care,” Studies in Family Planning 33(2): 127140.
  • Bongaarts, John. 1992. “Do reproductive intentions matter?International Family Planning Perspectives 18(3): 102108.
  • Bradley, Sarah E.K., Trevor N. Croft, Joy D. Fishel, and Charles F. Westoff. 2012. “Revising unmet need for family planning,” DHS Analytical Studies 25. Calverton, MD: ICF International.
  • Bradley, Sarah E.K., Trevor. N. Croft, and Shea O. Rutstein. 2011. “The impact of contraceptive failure on unintended births and induced abortions: Estimates and strategies for reduction,” DHS Analytical Studies 22. Calverton, MD: ICF Macro.
  • Bradley, Sarah E.K., Hilary M. Schwandt, and Shane Khan. 2009. “Levels, trends, and reasons for contraceptive discontinuation,” DHS Analytical Studies 20. Calverton, MD.
  • Brody, Jane E. 2012. “Between contraceptives, a gap to bridge,” New York Times, 18 September. p. D16. http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/17/switching-contraceptives-effectively/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0. Accessed 3 October 2013.
  • Casterline, John B., Fatma El-Zanaty, and Laila O. El-Zeini. 2003. “Unmet need and unintended fertility: Longitudinal evidence from Upper Egypt,” International Family Planning Perspectives 29(4): 158166.
  • Casterline, John B., Zeba A. Sathar, and Minhaj ul Haque. 2001. “Obstacles to contraceptive use in Pakistan: A study in Punjab,” Studies in Family Planning 32(2): 95110.
  • Casterline, John, Susheela Singh, and Zeba Sathar. 2004. “Unwanted pregnancy and post-abortion complications in Pakistan: Findings from a national study.” Islamabad, Pakistan: Population Council.
  • Cleland, John, Stan Bernstein, Alex Ezeh, Anibal Faundes, Anna Glasier, and Jolene Innis. 2006. “Family planning: The unfinished agenda,” The Lancet 368(18): 18101827.
  • Curtis, Siǎn, Emily Evens, and William Sambisa. 2011. “Contraceptive discontinuation and unintended pregnancy: An imperfect relationship,” International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 37(2): 5866.
  • Freedman, Ronald, Albert I. Hermalin, and Ming-Cheng Chang. 1975. “Do statements about desired family size predict fertility? The case of Taiwan, 1967–1970,” Demography 12(3): 407416.
  • Harbison, Sarah. 2005. “Completing the demographic transition in developing countries: What does quality have to do with it?” Paper presented at the XXV International Population Conference of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, Tours, France, 18–23 July.
  • Hermalin, Albert I, Ronald Freedman, Te-Hsiung Sun, and Ming-Cheng Chang. 1979. “Do intentions predict fertility? The experience in Taiwan, 1967–74,” Studies in Family Planning 10(3): 7595.
  • Jain, Anrudh. K. 1989. “Fertility reduction and the quality of family planning services,” Studies in Family Planning 20(1): 116.
  • Jain, Anrudh. K. 1999. “Should eliminating unmet need for contraception continue to be a program priority?International Family Planning Perspectives 25(Suppl.): S39S43, and S49.
  • Jain, Anrudh. K. 2001. “Implications for evaluating the impact of family planning programs with a reproductive health orientation,” Studies in Family Planning 32(3): 220229.
  • Jain Anrudh, K., Francis Obare, Saumya RamaRao, and Ian Askew. 2013. “Reducing unmet need by supporting women with met need,” International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 39(3): 133141.
  • Jain, Anrudh K., Saumya Ramarao, Jacqueline Kim, and Marilou Costello. 2012. “Evaluation of an intervention to improve quality of care in family planning programme in the Philippines,” Journal of Biosocial Science 44(1): 2741.
  • Kodzi, Ivy A., John B. Casterline, and Peter Aglobitse. 2010. “The time dynamics of individual fertility preferences among rural Ghanaian women,” Studies in Family Planning 41(1): 4554.
  • Koenig, Michael A., Rajib Acharya, Sagri Singh, and Tarun K. Roy. 2006. “Do current measurement approaches underestimate levels of unwanted childbearing? Evidence from Rural India,” Population Studies 60(3): 243256.
  • Lesnewski, Ruth, Linda Prine, and Regina Ginzburg. 2011. “Preventing gaps when switching contraceptives,” American Academy of Family Physicians 83(5): 567570.
  • Mahmood, Arshad. 2012. “Birth spacing and family planning uptake in Pakistan: Evidence from FALAH.” Islamabad, Pakistan: Population Council.
  • National Institute of Population Studies (NIPS). 2008. Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2006–07. Islamabad, Pakistan and Calverton, MD: NIPS and Macro International.
  • Pariani, Siti, David M. Heer, and Maurice D. Van Arsdol, Jr. 1991. “Does choice make a difference to contraceptive use? Evidence from East Java,” Studies in Family Planning 22(6): 384390.
  • Ross, John and Karen Hardee. 2013. “Access to contraceptive methods and prevalence of use,” Journal of Biosocial Sciences 45(6): 761778.
  • Ross, John and John Stover. 2013. “Use of modern contraception increases when more methods become available: Analysis of evidence from 1982–2009,” Global Health: Science and Practice 1(2): 203212.
  • Roy, Tarun K., R.K. Sinha, Michael Koenig, Sanjay K. Mohanty, and Sangram K. Patel. 2008. “Consistency and predictive ability of fertility preference indicators: Longitudinal evidence from rural India,” International Family Planning Perspectives 34(3): 138145.
  • Sanogo, Diouratie, Saumya RamaRao, Heidi Jones, Penda N'diaye, Bineta M'bow, and Cheikh Bamba Diop. 2003. “Improving quality of care and use of contraceptives in Senegal,” African Journal of Reproductive Health 7(2): 5773.
  • Sathar, Zeba, Anrudh Jain, Saumya RamaRao, Minhaj ul Haque, and Jacqueline Kim. 2005. “Introducing client-centered reproductive health services in a Pakistani setting,” Studies in Family Planning 36(3): 221234.
  • Westoff, Charles F. and Akinrinola Bankole. 1998. “The time dynamics of unmet need: An example from Morocco,” International Family Planning Perspectives 24(1): 1224.