SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Valerie P. Hans, The impact of victim participation in Saiban-in trials in Japan: Insights from the American jury experience, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 2014, 42, 2, 103

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Sangjoon Kim, Jaihyun Park, Kwangbai Park, Jin-Sup Eom, Judge-Jury Agreement in Criminal Cases: The First Three Years of the Korean Jury System, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2013, 10, 1
  3. 3
    Barbara Luppi, Francesco Parisi, Jury Size and the Hung-Jury Paradox, The Journal of Legal Studies, 2013, 42, 2, 399

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Stephan Dickert, Britta Herbig, Andreas Glöckner, Christina Gansen, Roman Portack, The More the Better? Effects of Training, Experience and Information Amount in Legal Judgments, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2012, 26, 2
  5. 5
    Valerie P. Hans, David H. Kaye, B. Michael Dann, Erin J. Farley, Stephanie Albertson, Science in the jury box: Jurors’ comprehension of mitochondrial DNA evidence., Law and Human Behavior, 2011, 35, 1, 60

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Patricia D. Breen, The Trial Penalty and Jury Sentencing: A Study of Air Force Courts-Martial, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2011, 8, 1
  7. 7
    Min C. Kim, Steven D. Penrod, Legal decision making among Korean and American legal professionals and lay people, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 2010, 38, 4, 175

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Kristoffel Grechenig, Andreas Nicklisch, Christian Thöni, Punishment Despite Reasonable Doubt—A Public Goods Experiment with Sanctions Under Uncertainty, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2010, 7, 4
  9. 9
    Jane Goodman-Delahunty, Siegfried Ludwig Sporer, Unconscious influences in sentencing decisions: a research review of psychological sources of disparity, Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2010, 42, 1, 19

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Dennis J. Devine, Jennifer Buddenbaum, Stephanie Houp, Nathan Studebaker, Dennis P. Stolle, Strength of evidence, extraevidentiary influence, and the liberation hypothesis: Data from the field., Law and Human Behavior, 2009, 33, 2, 136

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Mary R. Rose, Access to Justice, 2009,

    CrossRef

  12. You have free access to this content12
    JOSEPH SANDERS, A Norms Approach to Jury “Nullification:” Interests, Values, and Scripts, Law & Policy, 2008, 30, 1
  13. 13
    Valerie P. Hans, Jury Systems Around the World, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2008, 4, 1, 275

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Bruce D. Spencer, Estimating the Accuracy of Jury Verdicts, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2007, 4, 2
  15. 15
    Michael A. Yarnell, Jury Reform: Where is the Science the Arizona Jury: Past, Present & Future Reform, Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2006, 38, 1, 23

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Neil Vidmar, Expert Evidence, the Adversary System, and the Jury, American Journal of Public Health, 2005, 95, S1, S137

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Nancy J. King, Rosevelt L. Noble, Jury Sentencing in Noncapital Cases: Comparing Severity and Variance with Judicial Sentences in Two States, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2005, 2, 2
  18. 18
    Shari Seidman Diamond, Mary R. Rose, REAL JURIES, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2005, 1, 1, 255

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Edie Greene, Christina Studebaker, Jury Dynamics, Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science,