SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    N. Scurich, D. A. Krauss, The presumption of dangerousness in sexually violent predator commitment proceedings, Law, Probability and Risk, 2014, 13, 1, 91

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    William C. Thompson, Suzanne O. Kaasa, Tiamoyo Peterson, Do Jurors Give Appropriate Weight to Forensic Identification Evidence?, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2013, 10, 2
  3. 3
    Mitchell Holland, Forensic DNA Analysis, 2013,

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Jonathan J. Koehler, If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2011, 8,
  5. 5
    Cedric Neumann, Ismael Mateos-Garcia, Glenn Langenburg, Jennifer Kostroski, James E. Skerrett, Martin Koolen, Operational benefits and challenges of the use of fingerprint statistical models: A field study, Forensic Science International, 2011, 212, 1-3, 32

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Nicholas Scurich, Richard S. John, Trawling Genetic Databases: When a DNA Match is Just a Naked Statistic, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2011, 8,
  7. 7
    Valerie P. Hans, Jury Systems Around the World, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2008, 4, 1, 275

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Jonathan J. Koehler, Statistical Evidence in Court, Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science,