This research was supported by the National Institute of Justice and the Open Society Institute. Schulhofer's work was also supported by the Filomen D'Agostino and Max E. Greenberg Research Funds at New York University School of Law. Huq's work was also supported by the Frank Cicero, Jr. Faculty Fund at the University of Chicago School of Law and a Carnegie Scholars fellowship. We thank Frank Zimring, two anonymous reviewers for the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, and also conference and workshop participants at the 2010 Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, the University of Chicago Law School, the Yale Law School, the Political Science Department of Yale University, and the University of Minnesota Law School for helpful comments. This research was conducted with support from the Law and Social Science program of the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF0751874).
Mechanisms for Eliciting Cooperation in Counterterrorism Policing: Evidence from the United Kingdom
Article first published online: 27 OCT 2011
Copyright © 2011 Cornell Law School and Wiley Subscription Services, Inc.
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
Volume 8, Issue 4, pages 728–761, December 2011
How to Cite
Huq, A. Z., Tyler, T. R. and Schulhofer, S. J. (2011), Mechanisms for Eliciting Cooperation in Counterterrorism Policing: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8: 728–761. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01239.x
- Issue published online: 27 OCT 2011
- Article first published online: 27 OCT 2011
This article has been cited by:
- 1Law students' trust in the courts and the police, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 2014,, , ,
- 2Officers as Mirrors: Policing, Procedural Justice and the (Re)Production of Social Identity, British Journal of Criminology, 2014, 54, 4, 527, , ,
- 4The Political Psychology of Counterterrorism, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2013, 9, 1, 71,