SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    National Statistics. Internet access. Available from: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=8.
  • 2
    Pew Internet and American Life Project. Internet Health Resources. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=95.
  • 3
    Pandolfini, C. & Bonati, M. Follow up of quality of public oriented health information on the world wide web: systematic re-evaluation. BMJ 2002, 324, 5823.
  • 4
    Bouchier, H. & Bath, P. A. Evaluation of websites that provide information on Alzheimer's disease. Health Informatics Journal 2003, 9, 1731.
  • 5
    European Union. Quality Criteria for Health Related Websites. Available from: http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/ehealth/quality/draft_guidelines/index_en.htm.
  • 6
    Hi.-Ethics. Health Internet Ethics: Ethical Principles for Offering Internet Health Services to Consumers. Available from: http://www.hiethics.com/Principles/index.asp.
  • 7
    Internet Healthcare Coalition. eHealth Code of Ethics. Available from: http://www.ihealthcoalition.org/ethics/ethics.html.
  • 8
    CHIQ. H i Quality Guidelines on Health Information Quality. Available from: http://www.hfht.org/hiquality/default.htm.
  • 9
    NHS Health Development Agency and CHIQ. QUICK. The Quality Information ChecKlist. Available from: http://www.quick.org.uk/.
  • 10
    Discern. Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information. Available from: http://www.discern.org.uk/.
  • 11
    Health On the Net Foundation. H. O. N. Code of Conduct (HONcode) for Medical and Health Web Sites. Available from: http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html.
  • 12
    TRUSTe. Privacy Seal. Available from: http://www.truste.org/.
  • 13
    URAC. Health Web Site Accreditation. Available from: http://www.urac.org/consumer_healthwebsite.asp.
  • 14
    Medical Circle. The Collaboration for Internet Rating, Certification, Labeling and Evaluation of Health Information. Available from: http://www.medcircle.org/.
  • 15
    Baur, C. & Deering, M. J. Proposed frameworks to improve the quality of health web sites: review. Medscape General Medicine 2000, 2, e35.
  • 16
    Kamel Boulos, M. N., Roudsari, A. V., Gordon, C. & Muir Gray, J. A. The use of quality benchmarking in assessing web resources for the dermatology virtual branch library of the National electronic Library for Health (NeLH). Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001, 3 (1), e5.
  • 17
    Risk, A. & Dzenowagis, J. Review of internet health information quality initiatives. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2001, 3 (4), e28.
  • 18
    Wilson, P. How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet. BMJ 2002, 324: 598600.
  • 19
    Delamothe, T. Quality of websites: kitemarking the west wind. BMJ 2000, 321, 8434.
  • 20
    Purcell, G. P., Wilson, P. & Delamothe, T. The quality of health information on the internet. BMJ 2002, 324, 5578.
  • 21
    Fallis, D. & Fricke, M. Indicators of accuracy of consumer health information on the Internet: a study of indicators relating to information for managing fever in children in the home. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2002, 9, 739.
  • 22
    Gagliardi, A. & Jadad, A. J. Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination. BMJ 2002, 324, 56973.
  • 23
    Cline, R. J. & Haynes, K. M. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Education Research 2001, 16, 67192.
  • 24
    Kim, P., Eng, T. R., Deering, M. J. & Maxfield, A. Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: a review. BMJ 1999, 318, 6479.
  • 25
    Silberg, W. M., Lundberg, G. D. & Musacchio, R. A. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. Caveant lector et viewor—Let the reader and viewer beware. Journal of the American Medical Association 1997, 277, 12445.
  • 26
    Fox, N. Use of the Internet by medical voluntary groups in the UK. Social Science and Medicine 2001, 52, 1556.
  • 27
    Oravec, J. A. On the ‘proper use’ of the Internet: self-help medical information and on-line health care. Journal of Health and Social Policy 2001, 14, 3760.
  • 28
    Bath, P. A. & Bouchier, H. Development and application of a tool designed to evaluate web sites providing information on Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Information Science 2003, 29, 27997.
  • 29
    Cooke, A. Quality of health and medical information on the Internet. Clinical Performance and Quality Health Care 1999, 7, 17885.
  • 30
    Theme issue. Consumers searching for health information on the Web. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2003, 5 (4).