• 1
    Ballance D. DICOM and the network. Vet Rad Ultrasound 2008;49:S29S32.
  • 2
    Wright M, Ballance D, Robertson ID, et al. Introduction to DICOM for the practicing veterinarian. Vet Rad Ultrasound 2008;49:S14S18.
  • 3
    A.C.R. American College of Radiology. ACR technical standards for teleradiology: American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, 2002.
  • 4
    Bacher K, Smeets P, De Hauwere A, et al. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection. Eur J Radiol 2006;58:471479.
  • 5
    Badano A. PACS equipment overview: display systems. RadioGraphics 2004;24:879889.
  • 6
    Balassy C, Prokop M, Weber M, et al. Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:752756.
  • 7
    Batchelor J. Monitor choice impacts diagnostic accuracy and throughput. May 4, 2002. (accessed September 11, 2007)
  • 8
    Doyle AJ, Le Fevre J, Anderson GD. Personal computer versus workstation display: observer performance in detection of wrist fractures on digital radiographs. Radiology 2005;237:872877.
  • 9
    Graf B, Simon U, Eickmeyer F, et al. 1K versus 2K monitor: a clinical alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic study of observer performance using pulmonary nodules. Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:10671074.
  • 10
    Herron JM, Bender TM, Campbell WL, et al. Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs. Radiology 2000;215:169174.
  • 11
    Kotter E, Bley TA, Saueressig U, et al. Comparison of the detectability of high- and low-contrast details on a TFT screen and a CRT screen designed for radiologic diagnosis. Invest Radiol 2003;38:719724.
  • 12
    Pal S. LCD just as good as conventional monitors for chest CR. April 30, 2002. (accessed September 11, 2007).
  • 13
    Peer S, Giacomuzzi SM, Peer R, et al. Resolution requirements for monitor viewing of digital flat-panel detector radiographs: a contrast detail analysis. Eur Radiol 2003;13:413417.
  • 14
    Saunders RS Jr, Samei E. Resolution and noise measurements of five CRT and LCD medical displays. Med Phys 2006;33:308319.
  • 15
    Song K, Lee J, Kim H, et al. Effect of monitor luminance on the detection of solitary pulmonary nodule: ROC analysis. SPIE Conf Image Perception Perform 1999;3663:212216.
  • 16
    Prokop M, Neitzel U, Schaefer-Prokop C. Principles of image processing in digital chest radiography. J Thorac Imaging 2003;18:148164.
  • 17
    Hirschorn D, Dreyer K. Do I Still Need a Grayscale Monitor? Imaging Economics: Imaging Informatics, February 2006. (accessed September 11, 2007).
  • 18
    Bushberg J, Seibert J, Leidholdt E, et al. The essential physics of medical imaging, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2002.
  • 19
    Krupinski EA, Johnson J, Roehrig H, et al. Use of a human visual system model to predict observer performance with CRT vs LCD display of images. J Digit Imag 2004;17:258263.
  • 20
    Krupinski E, Roehrig H, Furukawa T. Influence of film and monitor luminance on observer performance and visual search. Acad Radiol 1999;6:411418.
  • 21
    Ly CK. SoftCopy display quality assurance program at Texas children's hospital. J Digit Imag 2002;15 (Suppl 1):3340.
  • 22
    Seto E, Ursani A, Cafazzo JA, et al. Image quality assurance of soft copy display systems. J Digit Imag 2005;18:280286.
  • 23
    Krupinski E, Roehrig H. The influence of a perceptually linearized display on observer performance and visual search. Acad Radiol 2000;7:813.
  • 24
    Krupinski E, Roehrig H, Fan J. Does the age of liquid crystal displays influence observer performance? Acad Radiol 2007;14:463467.
  • 25
    Otto D, Bernhardt TM, Rapp-Bernhardt U, et al. Subtle pulmonary abnormalities: detection on monitors with varying spatial resolutions and maximum luminance levels compared with detection on storage phosphor radiographic hard copies. Radiology 1998;207:237242.
  • 26
    Haak R, Wicht MJ, Hellmich M, et al. Influence of room lighting on grey-scale perception with a CRT-and a TFT monitor display. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:193197.
  • 27
    Reiner B, Siegel E, Krupinski E. Digital radiographic image presentation and display. Chicago, IL: RSNA, 2003.
  • 28
    Weiser J, Romlein J. Monitor minefield. Imaging Economics: Imaging Informatics, April 2006. (accessed September 11, 2007).
  • 29
    Krupinski E, Kallergi M. Choosing a radiology workstation: technical and clinical considerations. Radiology 2007;242:671682.
  • 30
    Fifadara D, Averbukh A, Channin D, et al. Effect of viewing angle on luminance and contrast for a five million pixel monochrome display and a nine million pixel color liquid crystal display. J Digit Imag 2004;17:264270.
  • 31
    Blehm C, Vishnu S, Khattack A, et al. Computer vision syndrome: a review. Surv of Ophthalmol 2005;50:253262.
  • 32
    Krupinski E, Lund P. Differences in time to interpretation for evaluation of bone radiographs with monitor and film viewing. Acad Radiol 1997;4:177182.