• Please log in or register to access this feature.
You have free access to this content

DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING

  1. WINNIE Y. LO1,
  2. SARAH M. PUCHALSKI2

Article first published online: 10 JAN 2008

DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2007.00333.x

Issue

Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound

Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound

Volume 49, Issue Supplement s1, pages S42–S47, January–February 2008

Additional Information

How to Cite

LO, W. Y. and PUCHALSKI, S. M. (2008), DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, 49: S42–S47. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2007.00333.x

Author Information

  1. 1

    Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616

  2. 2

    Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616

*Address correspondence and reprint requests to Winnie Y. Lo, at the above address. E-mail: wylo@vmth.ucdavis.edu

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 10 JAN 2008
  2. Article first published online: 10 JAN 2008

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (796K)

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Christina Copple, Ian D. Robertson, Donald E. Thrall, Ehsan Samei, EVALUATION OF TWO OBJECTIVE METHODS TO OPTIMIZE KVP AND PERSONNEL EXPOSURE USING A DIGITAL INDIRECT FLAT PANEL DETECTOR AND SIMULATED VETERINARY PATIENTS, Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, 2013, 54, 1
    Direct Link:
  2. 2
    Petra Feichtenhofer, Hubert Simhofer, Karin Hof, Sibylle Kneissl, A Complementary Radiographic Projection of the Equine Maxillary Sinus, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 2012,

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Sarah M. Puchalski, Advances in Equine Computed Tomography and Use of Contrast Media, Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice, 2012, 28, 3, 563

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Nathan C. Nelson, Lisa J. Zekas, David J. Reese, Digital Radiography for the Equine Practitioner, Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice, 2012, 28, 3, 483

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    David J. Reese, Eric M. Green, Lisa J. Zekas, Jane E. Flores, Lawrence N. Hill, Matthew D. Winter, Clifford R. Berry, Norman Ackerman, Intra- and interobserver variability of board-certified veterinary radiologists and veterinary general practitioners for pulmonary nodule detection in standard and inverted display mode images of digital thoracic radiographs of dogs, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 2011, 238, 8, 998

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Pavel Proks, Alois Necas, Ladislav Stehlik, Robert Srnec, Dominique J. Griffon, Quantification of Humeroulnar Incongruity in Labrador Retrievers with and without Medial Coronoid Disease, Veterinary Surgery, 2011, 40, 8
    Direct Link:
  7. 7
    Wm Tod Drost, Transitioning to digital radiography, Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, 2011, 21, 2
    Direct Link:
  8. 8
    Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse, 2011,

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Laura J. Armbrust, Comparing Types of Digital Capture, Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 2009, 39, 4, 677

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    David A. Jiménez, Laura J. Armbrust, Digital Radiographic Artifacts, Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 2009, 39, 4, 689

    CrossRef

  11. You have free access to this content11
    WILLIAM R. WIDMER, ACQUISITION HARDWARE FOR DIGITAL IMAGING, Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, 2008, 49,
    Direct Link:
  12. You have free access to this content12
    WM TOD DROST, DAVID J. REESE, WILLIAM J. HORNOF, DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY ARTIFACTS, Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, 2008, 49,
    Direct Link:
  13. 13
    Petra Agthe, Imaging: Practice radiography How to improve image quality: Part 2, Companion Animal, 2008, 13, 9
    Direct Link:
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (796K)