SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Langmack KA. Portal imaging. Br J Radiol 2001;74:789804.
  • 2
    Rohrer Bley C, Blattmann H, Roos M, et al. Assessment of a radiotherapy patient immobilization device using single plane port radiographs and a remote computed tomography scanner. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2003;44:470475.
  • 3
    Kippenes H, Gavin PR, Sande RD, et al. Accuracy of positioning the cervical spine for radiation therapy and the relationship to GTV, CTV and PTV. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2003;44:714719.
  • 4
    Kippenes H, Gavin PR, Sande RD, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of positioning devices for radiation therapy of canine and feline head tumors. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000;41:371376.
  • 5
    Green EM, Forrest LJ, Adams WM. A vacuum-formable mattress for veterinary radiotherapy positioning: comparison with conventional methods. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2003;44:476479.
  • 6
    Hurkmans CW, Remeijer P, Lebesque JV, et al. Set-up verification using portal imaging: review of current clinical practice. Radiother Oncol 2001;58:105120.
  • 7
    McEntee MC, Thrall DE. Use of portal radiography to increase accuracy of dose delivery in radiation therapy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1995;36:6977.
  • 8
    Schiffner DC, Gottschalk AR, Lometti M, et al. Daily electronic portal imaging of implanted gold seed fiducials in patients undergoing radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;67:610619.
  • 9
    Serago CF, Buskirk SJ, Igel TC, et al. Comparison of daily megavoltage electronic portal imaging or kilovoltage imaging with marker seeds to ultrasound imaging or skin marks for prostate localization and treatment positioning in patients with prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;65:15851592.
  • 10
    McEntee MC. A survey of veterinary radiation therapy facilities in the United States during 2001. Vet Radiat Ultrasound 2004;45:476479.
  • 11
    Byhardt RW, Cox JD, Hornburg A, et al. Weekly localization films and detection of field placement errors. Int J Radiol Oncol Biol Phys 1978;4:881887.
  • 12
    Perera T, Moseley J, Munro P. Subjectivity in interpretation of portal films. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;45:529534.
  • 13
    Wratten CR, Denham JW, Kron T, et al. ‘When measurements mean action’ decision models for portal image review to eliminate systematic set-up errors. Aust Radiol 2004;48:272279.
  • 14
    Matsopoulos GK, Aavestas PA, Delibasis KK, et al. Registration of electronic portal images for patient set-up verification. Phys Med Biol 2004;49:32793289.
  • 15
    Kippenes H, Gavin PR, Parsaei H, et al. Spatial accuracy of fractionated IMRT delivery studies in canine paraspinal irradiation. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2003;44:360366.
  • 16
    Walker MA, Steinheimer DN, Weir VA, et al. A review of portal screen–film technology and five radiologists' evaluations of some existing products. Vet Rad Ultrasound 1999;40:318322.
  • 17
    Langmack KA, Goss V. Characterization of new portal film systems for radiotherapy verification. Br J Radiol 1999;72:479484.
  • 18
    Foulkes KM, Ostwald PM, Kron T. A clinical comparison of different film systems for radiotherapy portal imaging. Med Dosimetry 2001;26:281284.
  • 19
    Lee PC, Glasgow GP. Technique charts for kodak's new film–screen systems for portal localization. Med Dosimetry 1998;23:113116.
  • 20
    Sandilos P, Antypas C, Paraskevopoulou C, et al. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6 MV X-ray beam. Technol Health Care 2006;14:467472.
  • 21
    Waddington SP, Mckenzie AL. Assessment of effective dose from concomitant exposures required in verification of the target volume in radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 2004;77:557561.
  • 22
    Kudchadker RJ, Chang EL, Bryan F, et al. An evaluation of radiation exposure from portal films taken during definitive course of pediatric radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;59:12291235.
  • 23
    Antonuk LE. Electronic portal imaging devices: a review and historical perspective of contemporary technologies and research. Phys Med Biol 2002;47:R31R65.
  • 24
    Kruse JJ, Herman MG, Hagness CR, et al. Electronic and film portal images: a comparison of landmark visibility and review accuracy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;54:584591.
  • 25
    Morin O, Gillis A, Chen J, et al. Megavoltage cone-beam CT: system description and clinical applications. Med Dosimetry 2006;31:5161.
  • 26
    Hatherly K, Smylie J, Rodger A. A comparison of field-only electronic portal imaging hard copies with double exposure port films in radiation therapy treatment setup confirmation to determine its clinical application in a radiotherapy center. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;45:791796.