• 1
    Bischofberger AS, Konar M, Ohlerth S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography and histology of the origin of the suspensory ligament: a comparative study of the normal anatomy of Warmblood horses. Equine Vet J 2006;38:508516.
  • 2
    Sampson SN, Tucker RL. Magnetic resonance imaging of the proximal metacarpal and metatarsal regions. Clin Tech Equine Pract 2007;6:7885.
  • 3
    Nasvall KE, Dyson SJ, Murray RC. The appearance of the proximal part of the metacarpal/metatarsal interosseous ligaments in MRI of horses with no history of lameness. Proceedings of the 47th Congress of the British Equine Veterinary Association, Liverpool, UK, 2008;142.
  • 4
    Widmer WR, Buckwalter KA, Hill MA, Fessler JF, Ivancevich S. A technique for magnetic resonance imaging of equine cadaver specimens. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1999;40:1014.
  • 5
    Getty R. Sisson and Grossman's the anatomy of the domestic animals, 5th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1990.
  • 6
    Budras KD, Sack WO, Rock S. Anatomy of the horse, 3rd ed. Hannover: Schlutersche, 2001.
  • 7
    Brokken MT, Schneider RK, Sampson SN, Tucker RL, Gavin PR, Ho CP. Magnetic resonance imaging features of proximal metacarpal and metatarsal injuries in the horse. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007;48:507517.
  • 8
    Erickson SJ, Prost RW, Timins ME. The “magic angle” effect: background physics and clinical relevance. Radiology 1993;188:2325.
  • 9
    Becker CK, Savelberg HHCM, Barneveld A. In vitro mechanical properties of the accessory ligament of the deep digital flexor tendon in horses in relation to age. Equine Vet J 1994;26:454459.
  • 10
    Murray RC. Magnetic resonance imaging of the equine carpus. Clinical Techniques in Equine Practice 2007;6:7885.