Sonia Bithell's current address is Shield Veterinary Centre, Bishops Waltham, Hampshire, UK.
REPEATABILITY AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF TRANSABDOMINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHIC INTESTINAL WALL THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS IN THOROUGHBRED HORSES
Article first published online: 4 NOV 2010
© 2010 Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound
Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound
Volume 51, Issue 6, pages 647–651, November/December 2010
How to Cite
BITHELL, S., HABERSHON-BUTCHER, J. L., BOWEN, I. M. and HALLOWELL, G. D. (2010), REPEATABILITY AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF TRANSABDOMINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHIC INTESTINAL WALL THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS IN THOROUGHBRED HORSES. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, 51: 647–651. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2010.01715.x
Jocelyn L. Habershon-Butcher's current address is Bell Equine Clinic, Maidstone, Kent, UK.
Mark Bowen's current address is School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire LE12 9JY, UK.
Gayle D. Hallowell's current address is 14, Threadcutters Way, Shepshed, Leicestershire LE12 9JY, UK.
- Issue published online: 4 NOV 2010
- Article first published online: 4 NOV 2010
- Received December 15, 2008; accepted for publication April 20, 2010.
- large intestine;
- small intestine
The aims of this study were to assess the repeatability and reproducibility of transabdominal ultrasonography to assess intestinal wall thickness in adult Thoroughbred horses (n=8). Ultrasonographic cineloops were captured by one examiner from each horse for five consecutive days. During each examination at least three cineloops were obtained for five different intestinal tract locations. Measurements were performed by three separate observers to assess reproducibility and measured on three separate occasions by three observers to evaluate short-term repeatability. The repeatability of measurements from the duodenum (0.3±0.04 cm), jejunum (0.29±0.05 cm), ventral colon (0.37±0.01 cm), and cecum (0.42±0.03 cm) were good (P>0.291). The reproducibility of measurements from the duodenum, jejunum, and ventral colon were good (P>0.394). Reproducibility of measurement of the cecal wall was inadequate (P=0.01), although the maximum difference between observers was 0.07 cm. It was possible to image all areas on all days, with the exception of the duodenum, which could not be imaged in one horse, on 1 day. Equine intestinal wall measurements are therefore repeatable and reproducible with the exception of reproducibility of the measurements of cecal wall. Although an accepted clinical technique, measurement of cecal wall thickness from intestinal ultrasound images in a clinical setting must be interpreted with care.