SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Krupinski EA, Williams MB, Andriole K, et al. Digital radiography image quality: image processing and display. J Am Coll Roentgenol 2007;4:389400.
  • 2
    Puchalski SM. Image display. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2008;49 (Suppl 1):S9S13.
  • 3
    Pisano ED, Cole EB, Kistner EO, et al. Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology 2002;223:483488.
  • 4
    Mattoon JS. Digital radiography. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006;19:123132.
  • 5
    Don S, Whiting BR, Ellinwood JS, et al. Neonatal chest computed radiography: image processing and optimal image display. Am J Roentgenol 2007;88:11381144.
  • 6
    Shtern F, Winfield D. Report of the Working Group on Digital Mammography: digital displays and workstation design. Acad Radiol 1999;6:S197S218.
  • 7
    Otto D, Bernhardt TM, Rapp-Bernhardt U, et al. Subtle pulmonary abnormalities: detection on monitors with varying spatial resolutions and maximum luminance levels compared with detection on storage phosphor radiographic hard copies. Radiology 1998;207:237242.
  • 8
    Peer S, Giacomuzzi SM, Peer R, et al. Resolution requirements for monitor viewing of digital flat-panel detector radiographs: a contrast detail analysis. Eur Radiol 2003;13:413417.
  • 9
    Krupinski E, Kallergi M. Choosing a radiology workstation: technical and clinical considerations. Radiology 2007;242:671682.
  • 10
    Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. Richtlinie zur Durchführung der Qualitätssicherung bei Röntgeneinrichtungen zur Untersuchung oder Behandlung von Menschen nach den §§ 16 und 17 der Röntgenverordnung (Qualitätssicherungs-Richtlinie) vom 20.11.2003, (geändert durch Rundschreiben vom 14.12.2009). Available at http://www.bmu.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/qs_richtlinie.pdf (accessed December 15, 2010).
  • 11
    Bundesärztekammer Leitlinien der Bundesärztekammer zur Qualitätssicherung in der Röntgendiagnostik–Qualitätskriterien röntgendiagnostischer Untersuchungen, 23rd November 2007. Dt Ärzteblatt 2008; 105: A 536. Available at http://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/downloads/LeitRoentgen2008Korr2.pdf (accessed February 19, 2008).
  • 12
    Deutsches Institut für Normung. Sicherung der Bildqualität in röntgendiagnostischen Betrieben, Teil 57: Abnahmeprüfung an Bildwiedergabegeräten, DIN V 6868-57. Berlin: Beuth Verlag, 2007.
  • 13
    Gray JE. Use of the SMPTE test pattern in picture archiving and communication systems. J Digit Imaging 1992;5:5458.
  • 14
    Månsson LG. Methods for the evaluation of image quality: A review. Radiat Prot Dosim 2000;90:8999.
  • 15
    Deutsches Institut für Normung. Bildschirmarbeitsplätze; Ergonomische Gestaltung des Arbeitsraumes; Beleuchtung und Anordnung, DIN 66234-7. Berlin: Beuth Verlag; 1985.
  • 16
    Båth M, Månsson LG. Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality analysis. Br J Radiol 2007;80:169176.
  • 17
    Krupinski EA, Johnson J, Roehrig H, et al. Use of a human visual system model to predict observer performance with CRT vs. LCD display of images. J Digit Imaging 2004;17:258263.
  • 18
    Lehmkuhl L, Mulzer J, Teichgraeber U, et al. Evaluation der Abbildungsqualität unterschiedlicher Befundungsmodalitäten in der digitalen Radiologie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004;176:10311038.
  • 19
    Balassy C, Prokop M, Weber M, et al. Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:752756.
  • 20
    Kotter E, Bley TA, Saueressig U, et al. Comparison of the detectability of high- and low-contrast details on a TFT screen and a CRT screen designed for radiologic diagnosis. Invest Radiol 2003;38:719724.
  • 21
    Doyle AJ, Le Fevre J, Anderson GD. Personal computer versus workstation display: observer performance in detection of wrist fractures on digital radiographs. Radiology 2005;237:872877.
  • 22
    Langer S, Fetterly K, Mandrekar J, et al. ROC study of four LCD displays under typical medical center lighting conditions. J Digit Imaging 2005;19:3040.
  • 23
    Geijer H, Geijer M, Forsberg L, et al. Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology. J Digit Imaging 2007;20:114121.
  • 24
    Badano A. AAPM/RSNA tutorial on equipment selection: PACS equipment overview—display systems. Radio Graphics 2004;24:879889.
  • 25
    Weiser J, Romlein J.Monitor minefield. Imaging Economics: Imaging Informatics, April 2006. Available at http://www.imagingeconomics.com/issues/articles/2006-04_09.asp (accessed June 22, 2009).
  • 26
    Ikeda M, Ishigaki T, Shimamoto K, et al. Influence of monitor luminance change on observer performance for detection of abnormalities depicted on chest radiographs. Invest Radiol 2003;38:5763.
  • 27
    Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). Part 14; grayscale standard display function, March 2003. http://www.medical.nema.org/dicom/2003/03_14PU.pdf (accessed June 22, 2009).
  • 28
    Wright MA, Balance D, Robertson IA, et al. Introduction to DICOM for the practicing veterinarian. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2008;49 (Suppl 1):S14S18.
  • 29
    Fachverband Elektromedizinische Technik. Systemaspekte bei Bildwiedergabegeräten und Bildarbeitsplätzen. In: ZVEI (ed): Qualitätssicherung an Bildwiedergabegeräten—Ein Kompendium zur Information über Grundlagen, Technik und Durchführung, 2nd edn. Frankfurt: ZVEI, 2004;3038.
  • 30
    Ricke J, Hanninen EL, Zielinski C, et al. Shortcoming so low-cost imaging systems for viewing computed radiographs. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2000;24:2532.
  • 31
    Samei E, Bandano A, Chakraborty D, et al. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of the AAPM TG18 report. Med Phys 2005;32:12051225.
  • 32
    Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. Recommended standards for the routine performance testing of diagnostic X-ray imaging systems, report 91 York: IPEM, 2005.
  • 33
    Japan Industries Association of Radiological Systems Standards. Quality Assurance (QA) Guideline for Medical Imaging Display Systems, JESRA X-0093-2005, August 2005. Available at http://www.jira-net.or.jp/commission/system/04_information/files/JESRAX-0093_e.pdf (accessed October 30, 2009).
  • 34
    Brettle DS. Display considerations for hospital-wide viewing of soft copy images. Br J Radiol 2007;80:503507.
  • 35
    Dougeni ED, Delis HB, Karatza AA, et al. Dose and image quality optimization in neonatal radiography. Br J Radiol 2007;80:807815.
  • 36
    Ludewig E, Hirsch W, Bosch B, et al. Untersuchungen zur Qualität von Thoraxaufnahmen bei Katzen mit einem auf einer Nadelstruktur basierenden Speicherfoliensystem—Modelluntersuchungen zur Bewertung der Bildqualität bei Neugeborenen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010;182:122131.
  • 37
    Fachverband Elektromedizinische Technik. Physiologie des menschlichen Sehens. In: ZVEI (ed): Qualitätssicherung an Bildwiedergabegeräten—Ein Kompendium zur Information über Grundlagen, Technik und Durchführung, 2nd edn. Frankfurt: ZVEI, 2004;6–11.
  • 38
    Martin CJ, Sharp PF, Sutton DG. Measurement of image quality in diagnostic radiology. Appl Radiat Isotop 1999;50:2138.
  • 39
    European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images, Report EUR 16260 EN Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities, 1996.
  • 40
    European Commission. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in paediatrics, Report EUR 16261 EN Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities, 1996.
  • 41
    Bacher K, Smeets P, Vereecken L, et al. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems. Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:630637.
  • 42
    Lanhede B, Båth M, Kheddache S, et al. The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria. Br J Radiol 2002;75:3849.
  • 43
    Rainford LA, Al-Qattan E, McFadden S, et al. CEC analysis of radiological images produced in Europe and Asia. Radiography 2007;3:202209.
  • 44
    Berry CR, Graham JP, Thrall DE. Interpretation paradigms for the small animal thorax. In: ThrallDE (ed): Textbook of veterinary diagnostic radiology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 2007;462485.
  • 45
    Comerford EJ. The stifle joint. In: BarrFJ, KirbergerRM (eds): BSAVA manual of canine and feline musculoskeletal imaging. Gloucester: BSAVA, 2006;135149.
  • 46
    Rudorf H, Taeymans O, Johnson V. Basics of thoracic radiography and radiology. In: SchwarzT, JohnsonV (eds): BSAVA Manual of canine and feline thoracic imaging. Gloucester: BSAVA, 2008;119.
  • 47
    Suter PF, Lord P. (eds): Thoracic radiography—a text atlas of thoracic diseases of the dog and cat. Wettswil: PF Suter Publisher, 1984.
  • 48
    Tapiovaara MJ. Review of relationships between physical measurements and user evaluation of image quality. Radiat Prot Dosim 2008;129:244248.