Cited in:


This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    E.J. Ives, N. Rousset, N. Heliczer, M.E. Herrtage, A.E. Vanhaesebrouck, Exclusion of a Brain Lesion: Is Intravenous Contrast Administration Required after Normal Precontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging?, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 2014, 28, 2
  2. 2
    John H. Rossmeisl, Paulo A. Garcia, Gregory B. Daniel, John Daniel Bourland, Waldemar Debinski, Nikolaos Dervisis, Shawna Klahn, INVITED REVIEW—NEUROIMAGING RESPONSE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA FOR BRAIN TUMORS IN VETERINARY PATIENTS, Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, 2014, 55, 2
  3. 3
    Evelien Bakker, Ingrid Gielen, Kaatje Kromhout, Henri Bree, Bernadette Ryssen, MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF PRIMARY AND CONCOMITANT FLEXOR ENTHESOPATHY IN THE CANINE ELBOW, Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, 2014, 55, 1
  4. 4
    K. Merhof, J. Lang, S. Dürr, C. Stahl, D. Gorgas, Use of Contrast-Enhanced Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Sequence to Detect Brain Lesions in Dogs and Cats, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 2014, 28, 4
  5. 5
    E. de Bakker, I. Gielen, J. H. Saunders, I. Polis, S. Vermeire, K. Peremans, J. Dewulf, H. van Bree, B. Van Ryssen, Primary and concomitant flexor enthesopathy of the canine elbow, Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2013, 26, 6, 425


  6. 6
    S. Eminaga, G. B. Cherubini, E. Villiers, M. Targett, A. Caine, STIR muscle hyperintensity in the cervical muscles associated with inflammatory spinal cord disease of unknown origin, Journal of Small Animal Practice, 2013, 54, 3
  7. 7
    F. H. David, J. Grierson, C. R. Lamb, EFFECTS OF SURGICAL IMPLANTS ON HIGH-FIELD MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGES OF THE NORMAL CANINE STIFLE, Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, 2012, 53, 3