Funding provided by the NCSU CVM Grant Research Award, North Carolina State University.
COMPARISON OF ABDOMINAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND ABDOMINAL ULTRASOUND IN SEDATED DOGS
Article first published online: 22 MAY 2012
© 2012 Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound
Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound
Volume 53, Issue 5, pages 513–517, September/October 2012
How to Cite
Fields, E. L., Robertson, I. D., Osborne, J. A. and Brown, J. C. (2012), COMPARISON OF ABDOMINAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND ABDOMINAL ULTRASOUND IN SEDATED DOGS. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound, 53: 513–517. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2012.01949.x
Abstract presented at ACVR Scientific Meeting, October 23, 2009 in Memphis, TN.
- Issue published online: 11 SEP 2012
- Article first published online: 22 MAY 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 9 APR 2012
- Manuscript Received: 10 NOV 2011
- comparison with ultrasound;
- multidetector CT;
- sedated dogs
Abdominal ultrasound (US) is used frequently as a first-line screening tool for abdominal disease. Although computed tomography (CT) is superior to US in the diagnosis of some abdominal diseases, a major impediment is the requirement of general anesthesia to prevent motion and for safe restraint. With multidetector helical CT, faster examinations allow general anesthesia to be avoided, while producing diagnostic-quality images. Abdominal US and CT were compared for lesion detection in 27 sedated dogs, divided into three even groups based on body weight. Lesions were categorized further as to subjective clinical relevance. In dogs less than 25 kg, there is no significant difference in lesion detection between CT and US. In dogs weighing greater than 25 kg, more lesions were detected with CT than with US (P = 0.0001), including clinically relevant lesions (P = 0.0277). From these results, it appears that CT has an advantage in lesion detection in dogs greater than 25 kg, making it a better screening test for abdominal disease in these patients.