Indigenous or Imported Knowledge in Brazilian Management Studies: A Quest for Legitimacy?
Article first published online: 6 JAN 2012
© 2011 The International Association for Chinese Management Research
Management and Organization Review
Special Issue: Indigenous Management Research in China
Volume 8, Issue 1, pages 211–232, March 2012
How to Cite
Rodrigues, S. B., Gonzalez Duarte, R. and de Padua Carrieri, A. (2012), Indigenous or Imported Knowledge in Brazilian Management Studies: A Quest for Legitimacy?. Management and Organization Review, 8: 211–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00276.x
- Issue published online: 22 MAR 2012
- Article first published online: 6 JAN 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 1 NOV 2011 09:23PM EST
- Manuscript received: December 30, 2009; Final version accepted: September 16, 2011; Accepted by: Anne S. Tsui
- imported knowledge;
- indigenous knowledge;
- institutional environment;
This article reflects upon the evolution of Brazilian management studies in light of the debate provoked by Management and Organization Review, 5(1), in a special edition on ‘The Future of Chinese Management Research’. Despite an impressive growth in publications, Brazilian management and organization studies have had little conversation with mainstream international scholarship. The article offers some explanations as to why this might be so and suggests some alternatives for enhancing the international impact of Brazilian studies and advancing the country's reputation in the field. We suggest two routes through which Brazilian management studies could enhance international legitimacy: an outside-in approach, which draws upon established international contributions to theory to inform the investigation, but uses the Brazilian context to enlighten these same theories, and an inside-out approach that draws upon indigenous questions and research design to develop a theory relevant to the Brazilian context, which ultimately contributes to the enhancement of existing or to the creation of new theories. In addition, this article suggests that ambidextrous policies provide a better fit for research strategies intended to foster both approaches.