The Incarnation and Jesus’ Apparent Limitation in Knowledge
Article first published online: 2 JUL 2012
© 2012 The Author. New Blackfriars © 2012 The Dominican Council.
Volume 94, Issue 1053, pages 583–602, September 2013
How to Cite
Loke, A. (2013), The Incarnation and Jesus’ Apparent Limitation in Knowledge. New Blackfriars, 94: 583–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2005.2012.01500.x
- Issue published online: 12 AUG 2013
- Article first published online: 2 JUL 2012
One of the problems confronting the doctrine of the Incarnation concerns Jesus’ apparent limitation in knowledge. This paper assesses various constructive proposals by modern theologians and philosophers, focusing on three of the most widely discussed solutions, namely Ontological Kenoticism, Two Consciousnesses Model, and Divine Subconscious Model. I argue that despite recent work done on the first two, the difficulties of avoiding the implication that the Logos ceased to be divine (for the first) and the implication of Nestorianism (for the second) remain. I conclude that the most promising solution is to defend Functional Kenoticism and develop the Divine Subconscious Model.