This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development (R01-HD32336) to Ann C. Crouter and Susan M. McHale, co-principal investigators. We are grateful to the families who participated in this project. We thank Kelly Bremer and Nicole Holderman for their work on this project as well as Kelly Davis, Aryn Dotterer, Sandee Hemman, Melissa Fortner, Kristen Johnston, Marni Kan, Ji-Yeon Kim, Carolyn Ransford, Lilly Shanahan, Cindy Shearer, Megan Winchell, and a large staff of graduate and undergraduate interviewers for their help in conducting this investigation. We also thank Susan McHale for her comments on this paper.
Processes of Sibling Influence in Adolescence: Individual and Family Correlates†
Article first published online: 2 JAN 2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00480.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Whiteman, S. D. and Christiansen, A. (2008), Processes of Sibling Influence in Adolescence: Individual and Family Correlates. Family Relations, 57: 24–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00480.x
- †
Publication History
- Issue published online: 2 JAN 2008
- Article first published online: 2 JAN 2008
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- adolescents;
- modeling;
- sibling deidentification;
- sibling differentiation;
- sibling influence;
- sibling relationships
Abstract: This study examined the nature and correlates of adolescents’ perceptions of sibling influence. Participants included 2 siblings (firstborn age M= 17.34; second-born age M= 14.76 years) from 191 maritally intact families. Adolescents’ perceptions of sibling influence were measured via coded responses to open-ended questions about whether their sibling had an influence on them. Analyses revealed that older and younger siblings reported different patterns of influence. Differentiation influence and being a role model were more prevalent for firstborns, whereas modeling and modeling plus differentiation were more prevalent for second-borns. First- and second-borns’ reports of influence were linked differentially to their relational and personal qualities. Discussion focuses on the need to refine the measurement of sibling influence processes.

1741-3729/asset/FARE_left.gif?v=1&s=19797566b531815c53084408cff365a40e71b653)
1741-3729/asset/FARE_right.gif?v=1&s=3322cd1a811d5482634c47b9b79f39d3f19399bf)
