Interface Demography–Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Repartnering and (Re)employment: Strategies to Cope With the Economic Consequences of Partnership Dissolution
Article first published online: 1 DEC 2009
Copyright © National Council on Family Relations, 2009
Journal of Marriage and Family
Volume 71, Issue 5, pages 1271–1293, December 2009
How to Cite
Jansen, M., Mortelmans, D. and Snoeckx, L. (2009), Repartnering and (Re)employment: Strategies to Cope With the Economic Consequences of Partnership Dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71: 1271–1293. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00668.x
Research Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies (CELLO), University of Antwerp, Sint Jacobstraat 2, B-2000 Antwerpen, Belgium (firstname.lastname@example.org).
This article was edited by David Johnson.
- Issue published online: 1 DEC 2009
- Article first published online: 1 DEC 2009
- economic issues;
- family policy;
- growth curve analysis
The economic consequences of a partnership dissolution have been described consistently in the research literature. For women all studies indicate severe financial losses, whereas men do not experience income decreases to the same extent. This article focuses on the 2 main strategies to cope with the economic consequences of a separation: repartnering and (re)employment. Using the European Community Household Panel Study we analyzed a sample of 66,292 individuals observed in a relationship of whom 4,925 subsequently separated and assessed the (relative) effect of both strategies in a cross-national longitudinal perspective. Where men do not benefit financially from cohabiting with a new partner, repartnering proves to outweigh the benefits of reentering the labor force or increasing the working hours for most women. This especially applies to mothers.