RACE IGNORE-ANCE, COLORTALK, AND WHITE COMPLICITY: WHITE IS…WHITE ISN’T1
Article first published online: 21 JUL 2006
Volume 56, Issue 3, pages 345–362, August 2006
How to Cite
Applebaum, B. (2006), RACE IGNORE-ANCE, COLORTALK, AND WHITE COMPLICITY: WHITE IS…WHITE ISN’T. Educational Theory, 56: 345–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00230.x
- Issue published online: 21 JUL 2006
- Article first published online: 21 JUL 2006
Abstract In this review essay, Barbara Applebaum uses white complicity as a framework for discussing three books: Mica Pollock’s Colormute: Race Talk Dilemmas in an American School, Debra Van Ausdale and Joe R. Feagin’s The First R: How Children Learn Race and Racist, and Virginia Lea and Judy Helfand’s Identifying Race and Transforming Whiteness in the Classroom. She explains the notion of white complicity and discusses some of the deep philosophical questions involving moral responsibility and agency that arise when one acknowledges white complicity. In particular, she examines the question of whether complicity is best described as grounded in individual intention or as an outcome of collective action, as well as whether “complicity” as a word displaces the strong sense of harm implied by the term “racist.” Finally, Applebaum explores how some of these philosophical questions crisscross through the discussions highlighted in the three books.